252
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Shaping qualitative research: the significance of shape in collaborative inquiry and other circles

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 30 Sep 2023, Accepted 22 Apr 2024, Published online: 10 Jun 2024

References

  • Atkinson, P., Baird, M., and Adams, K., 2021. Are you really using yarning research? Mapping social and family yarning to strengthen yarning research quality. Alternative: an international journal of indigenous peoples, 17 (2), 191–201. doi:10.1177/11771801211015442.
  • Bartlett, R., and Milligan, C., 2015. What is diary method? London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Bennett, B., et al., 2019. The Gaataa’aabing visual research method: a culturally safe Anishinaabek transformation of photovoice. International journal of qualitative methods, 18, 1–12. doi:10.1177/1609406919851635.
  • Bravington, A., 2023. Experience in the abstract: exploring the potential of graphic elicitation, edited by K. Roulston, ed. Questions for questioners: inventive approaches to qualitative interviews. Gorham, Maine, USA: Myers Education Press, 169–193.
  • Broderick, A.A., et al., 2012. Teacher counternarratives: transgressing and ‘restorying’ disability in education. International journal of inclusive education, 16, 825–842. doi:10.1080/13603116.2010.526636.
  • Brofenbrenner, U., 1979. The Ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Gorham, Maine, USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Brown, D.R.A.-M., 2023. Non-indigenous positionality when engaging in de-colonising/re-indigenising research and Its place within visual methodology. International journal of qualitative methods, 22, 1–9. doi:10.1177/16094069231159794.
  • Bryant, L., and Jaworski, K., 2015. Women supervising and writing doctoral theses: walking on the grass. Lanham, Maryland, USA: Lexington Books.
  • Carter, S., and Kumar, V., 2017. ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in education and teaching international, 54 (1), 68–75.
  • Clandinin, D.J., and Connelly, F.M., 2000. Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Darwin, A., and Palmer, E., 2009. Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher education research & development, 28 (2), 125–136. doi:10.1080/07294360902725017.
  • DeLuca, C., Bolden, B., and Chan, J., 2017. Systemic professional learning through collaborative inquiry: examining teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 67–78.
  • DeTurk, S., and Foster, E., 2008. Dialogue about dialogue – investigating intersubjectivity in interview research. Qualitative research journal, 8 (2), 14–27. doi:10.3316/QRJ0802014.
  • Fraser, N., 2017. The theory of the public sphere: the structural transformation of the public sphere (1962). In: H. Brunkhorst, R. Kreide, and C. Lafont, eds. In The Habermas handbook. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 245–255.
  • Freire, P., 1972. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder and Herder.
  • Freire, P., 1998. Teachers as cultural workers: letters to those who dare teach. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • González-Ocampo, G., and Castelló, M., 2019. How do doctoral students experience supervision?. Studies in continuing education, 41 (3), 293–307.
  • Guerin, C., and Green, I., 2015. ‘They’re the bosses’: feedback in team supervision. Journal of further and higher education, 39 (3), 320–335.
  • Gunasekera, G., Liyanagamage, N., and Fernando, M., 2021. The role of emotional intelligence in student-supervisor relationships: implications on the psychological safety of doctoral students. The international journal of management education, 19 (2), 100491.
  • Halse, C., 2011. ‘Becoming a supervisor’: the impact of doctoral supervision on supervisors’ learning. Studies in higher education, 36 (5), 557–570.
  • Haynes, C., Stewart, S., and Patton, L.D., 2023. Intersectionality methodology: a qualitative research imperative for black women's lives. In: N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln, M.D. Giardina, and G.S. Cannella, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. New York, NY: Sage, 153–166.
  • Hemer, S., 2012. Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher education research & development, 31 (6), 827–839. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.674011.
  • Henderson, E., 2018. Anticipating doctoral supervision: (not) bridging the transition from supervisee to supervisor. Teaching in higher education, 23 (4), 403–418.
  • Hickey, A., and Forbes, M., 2022. Higher degree research supervision beyond expertise: a rancièrean and freirean perspective on HDR supervision. Studies in higher education, 47 (8), 1712–1723.
  • Holmstrand, L., and Härnsten, G., 2003. Förutsättningar för Forskningscirklar i Skolan - en Kritisk Granskning. [Prerequisites for research circles in school - a critical review]. Stockholm: Myndigheten för Skolutveckling.
  • Hunt, S.C., and Young, N.L., 2021. Blending indigenous sharing circle and western focus group methodologies for the study of indigenous children’s health: a systematic review. International journal of qualitative methods, 20, 1–16. doi:10.1177/16094069211015112.
  • Kabat-Zinn, J., 2013. Full catastrophe living: how to cope with stress, pain and illness using mindfulness meditation. London: Piatkus.
  • Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R., 1981. The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University.
  • Kingsley, B.C., and Chapman, S.A., 2013. Questioning the meaningfulness of rigour in community-based research: navigating a dilemma. International journal of qualitative methods, 12 (1), 551–569. doi:10.1177/160940691301200129.
  • Klafki, W., 1997. Kritisk-konstruktiv didaktik [Critical constructive didactics]. In: M. Uljens, ed. Didaktik [Didactics]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 215–228.
  • Kolb, D.A., 1984. Experimental learning. experience as the source of learning and development. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M., 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Larsson, S., 2001. Seven aspects of democracy as related to study circles. International journal of lifelong education, 20 (3), 199–217. doi:10.1080/02601370110036073.
  • Lavallée, L.F., 2009. Practical application of an indigenous research framework and two qualitative indigenous research methods: sharing circles and anishnaabe symbol-based reflection. International journal of qualitative methos, 8 (1), 21–40. doi:10.1177/160940690900800103.
  • List, D., 2006. Action research cycles for multiple future perspectives. Futures, 38 (6), 673–684.
  • Macfarlane, B., 2021. The neoliberal academic: illustrating shifting academic norms in an age of hyper performativity. Educational philosophy and theory, 53 (5), 459–468. doi:10.1080/00131857.2019.1684262.
  • Månsson, A., and Rubinstein Reich, L., 2014. Democracy in research circles to enable new perspectives on early childhood education and didactics. Educare, 10 (2), 39–61.
  • McCown, D., 2013. The ethical space of mindfulness in clinical practice: an exploratory essay. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  • McCown, D., Reibel, D., and Micozzi, M.S., 2016. Resources for teaching mindfulness an international handbook. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Mckeever, P., et al., 2015. The development of an ethnography-based accessibility survey with and for disabled children. Journal of ethnographic and qualitative research, 10, 69–86.
  • McNiff, J., 1997. Action research: principles and practices. London: Routledge.
  • Nagda, B.R.A., Gurin, P., and Lopez, G.E., 2003. Transformative pedagogy for democracy and social justice. Race, ethnicity and education, 6 (2), 165–191.
  • Nind, M., et al., 2020. Student perspectives on learning research methods in the social sciences. Teaching in higher education, 25 (7), 797–811.
  • Nind, M., and Katramadou, A., 2023. Lessons for teaching social science research methods in higher education: synthesis of the literature 2014-2020. British journal of educational studies, 71 (3), 241–266.
  • Nind, M., Kilburn, D., and Wiles, R., 2015. Using video and dialogue to generate pedagogic knowledge: teachers, learners and researchers reflecting together on the pedagogy of social research methods. International journal of social research methodology, 18 (5), 561–576.
  • Nind, M., and Lewthwaite, S., 2018. Methods that teach: developing pedagogic research methods, developing pedagogy. International journal of research & method in education, 41 (4), 398–410.
  • O’Dwyer, S. 2015. How mindfulness can be beneficial in one-to-one study sessions for higher education students with dyslexia. MSc dissertation, University of Southampton.
  • Osmond, G., and Phillips, M.G., 2019. Yarning about sport: indigenous research methodologies and transformative historical narratives. International journal of the history of sport, 36 (13/14), 1271–1288.
  • Ravensbergen, F., and Vanderplaat, M., 2010. Learning circles: one form of knowledge production in social action research. Mcgill journal of education, 45 (3), 339–350.
  • Rieger, K.L., et al., 2023. Elevating the uses of storytelling methods within indigenous health research: a critical, participatory scoping review. International journal of qualitative methods, 22, 1–24. doi:10.1177/16094069231174764.
  • Rogers, J., 2017. Photoyarn: aboriginal and māori girls’ researching contemporary boarding school experiences. Australian aboriginal studies, 1, 3–13.
  • Rothe, J.P., Ozegovic, D., and Carroll, L.J., 2009. Innovation in qualitative interviews: “sharing circles” in a first nations community. Injury prevention, 15 (5), 334–340.
  • Rowell, L.L., et al., 2015. Action researchers’ perspectives about the distinguishing characteristics of action research: a Delphi and learning circles mixed-methods study. Educational action research, 23 (2), 243–270. doi:10.1080/09650792.2014.990987.
  • Schmitt, R., 2005. Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The qualitative report, 10 (2), 358–394. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1854.
  • Suda, L., 2009. Learning circles: democratic pools of knowledge. Aris resources bulletin, 12 (3), 1–4.
  • Ta, B.T., and Filipi, A., 2020. Storytelling as a resource for pursuing understanding and agreement in doctoral research supervision meetings. Journal of pragmatics, 165, 4–17.
  • Tafoya, T., 1995. Finding harmony: balancing traditional values with western science in therapy. Canadian journal of native education, 21, 7–27.
  • Teachman, G., and Gibson, B.E., 2018. Integrating visual methods with dialogical interviews in research with youth who use augmentative and alternative communication. International journal of qualitative methods, 17 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1177/1609406917750945.
  • Waddell-Henowitch, C., et al., 2022. A collaborative multi-method approach to evaluating indigenous land-based learning with men. International journal of qualitative methods, 21, 1–8. doi:10.1177/16094069221082359.
  • Waddell, C.M., et al., 2020. Grounded in culture: reflections on sitting outside the circle in community-based research with indigenous men. Qualitative health research, 30 (14), 2343–2350. doi:10.1177/1049732320960050.