Well-being vocabulary in media language: An analysis of changing word usage in Norwegian newspapers

References

• Aaberge, R., & Atkinson, A. B. (2010). Top incomes in Norway. In A. B. Atkinson & T. Piketty (Eds.), Top incomes: A global perspective (pp. 448–481). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, M. (2012). The debate about multicultural Norway before and after 22 July 2011. Identities, 19, 418–427. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2012.684442
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barstad, A. (2014). Levekår og livskvalitet: Vitenskapen om hvordan vi har det. [Living conditions and quality of life: The science of how we are doing] Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology (pp. 36–53). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M. (2006). A psychoanalytic discursive psychology: From consciousness to unconsciousness. Discourse Studies, 8, 17–24. doi:10.1177/1461445606059546.
   Google Scholar
• Blakar, R. M. (1979). Language as a means of social power. In R. Rommetveit & R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication (pp. 109–146). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlquist, E., Nafstad, H. E., & Blakar, R. M. (2007). Community psychology in a Scandinavian welfare society: The case of Norway. In S. M. Reich, M. Riemer, I. Prilleltensky, & M. Montero (Eds.), International community psychology (pp. 282–298). New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-49500-2
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2010). Communication power: Mass communication, mass self-communication, and power relationships in the network society. In J. Curran (Ed.), Media and society (pp. 3–17). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2011). Positive psychology: Where did it come from, where is it going. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 3–8). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373585.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. P. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.34
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. F. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334074.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being the collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41, 409–427. doi:10.1017/S0047279411000833
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, G. (2010). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of Government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 163–178. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9129-y
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2000). The mixed blessings of material progress: Diminishing returns in the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 267–292. doi:10.1023/a:1010040010239
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsæter, A. L., & Leira, A. (2006). Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender relations in welfare states. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, T. H. (1993). Being Norwegian in a shrinking world: Reflections on Norwegian identity. In A. C. Kiel (Ed.), Continuity and change: Aspects of contemporary Norway (pp. 11–38). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gooskens, C. (2005). How well can Norwegians identify their dialects? Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 28, 37–60. doi:10.1017/S0332586505001319
   Google Scholar
• Gough, I. (2004). Human well-being and social structures: Relating the universal and the local. Global Social Policy, 4, 289–311. doi:10.1177/1468018104047489
   Google Scholar
• Greco, M., & Stenner, P. (2013). Happiness and the art of life: Diagnosing the psychopolitics of wellbeing. Health, Culture and Society, 5(1), 1–19. doi:10.5195/hcs.2013.147
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M. (1991). The transformation of the Norwegian notion of everyday life. American Ethnologist, 18, 480–499. doi:10.1525/ae.1991.18.3.02a00040
   Google Scholar
• Hellevik, O. (2008). Jakten på den norske lykken. Norsk Monitor 1985-2007 [The Pursuit of Happiness in Norway. The Norwegian Monitor 1985-2007]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790881
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A. (2007). Language in the media: Authenticity and othering. In S. Johnson & A. Ensslin (Eds.), Language in the media: Representations, identities, ideologies (pp. 271–280). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. C., & Hønneland, G. (2011). Framing the high north: Public discourses in Norway after 2000. Acta Borealia, 28, 37–54. doi:10.1080/08003831.2011.575659
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2008). The “Two Landscapes” of North Norway and the “Cultural Landscape” of the South. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nordic landscapes: Region and belonging on the northern edge of Europe (pp. 283–299). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, S. (2015). Applied positive psychology 10 years on. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education and everyday life (pp. 1–6). Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9781118996874
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 3–25). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., & Steger, M. F. (2011). Challenges, pitfalls, and aspirations for positive psychology. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 9–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373585.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kesebir, P., & Kesebir, S. (2012). The cultural salience of moral character and virtue declined in twentieth century America. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 471–480. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.715182
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, D. A. (2013). Personal meaning: A challenge for psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 459–470. doi:10.1080/17439760.2013.830767
   Google Scholar
• Lolle, H. L., & Andersen, J. G. (2015). Measuring happiness and overall life satisfaction: A Danish survey experiment on the impact of language and translation problems. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9646-4
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L. (2008). Culture, self, and subjective well-being: Cultural psychological and social change perspectives. Psychologia, 51, 290–303. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2008.290
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, O. J. (2015). Optimizing the self: Social representations of self-help. Hove: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, G., & Izquierdo, C. (2008). Anthropology, happiness and well-being. In G. Mathews & C. Izquierdo (Eds.), Pursuits of happiness: Well-being in anthropological perspective (pp. 1–19). Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M., & Reynolds, A. (2009). How the news shapes our civic agenda. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, H. E. (2015). Positive psychology: Historical, philosophical, and epistemological perspectives. In S. Joseph (Ed.), Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education and everyday life (pp. 9–30). Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., Botchway, A., Bruer, E. S., Filkukova, P., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2013). Communal values and individualism in our era of globalization: A comparative longitudinal study of three different societies. In H. H. Knoop & A. Delle Fave (Eds.), Well-being and cultures (pp. 51–69). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Phelps, J. M., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2007). Ideology and power: The influence of current neo-liberalism in society. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 313–327. doi:10.1002/casp.931
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Phelps, J. M., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2009). Globalization, neo-liberalism and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 162–175. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9216-6
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2009). The spirit of society and the virtue of gratitude: A study of changing societal ideologies of gratitude. In T. Freire (Ed.), Understanding positive life: Research and practice on positive psychology (pp. 285–302). Lisboa: Climepsi.
   Google Scholar
• Nafstad, H. E., Carlquist, E., & Blakar, R. M. (2012). Towards a psychology for a humankind and a planet under multiple threats: A social psychology of ideology. In J. P. Valentim (Ed.), Societal approaches in social psychology (pp. 61–80). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Oishi, S., Graham, J., Kesebir, S., & Galinha, I. C. (2013). Concepts of happiness across time and cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 559–577. doi:10.1177/0146167213480042
   Google Scholar
• Østbye, H. (2007). The Norwegian media landscape. In G. Terzis (Ed.), European media governance: National and regional dimensions (pp. 157–169). Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 137–152. doi:10.1080/17439760701756946
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
   Google Scholar
• Perrons, D. (2004). Globalization and social change: People and places in a divided world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perse, E. M. (2001). Media effects and society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pflug, J. (2009). Folk theories of happiness: A cross-cultural comparison of conceptions of happiness in Germany and South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 92, 551–563. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9306-8
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J. M., Blakar, R. M., Carlquist, E., Nafstad, H. E., & Rand-Hendriksen, K. (2012). Symbolic boundaries and ideology in the Norwegian multicultural society: A longitudinal study of public discourse. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 187–205. doi:10.1002/casp.1126
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (2000). Psychological inquiry and the pragmatic and hermeneutic traditions. Theory & Psychology, 10, 453–479. doi:10.1177/0959354300104002
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (2003). On the role of “a psychology of the second person” in studies of meaning, language, and mind. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 10, 205–218. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1003_3
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking (response to the Kashdan et al. and Waterman discussion). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202–204. doi: 10.1080/17439760902844285
   Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13–39. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination: The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55, 79–88. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79.
   Google Scholar
• Sejersted, F., & Adams, M. B. (2011). The age of social democracy: Norway and Sweden in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Pawelski, J. O. (2003). Positive psychology: FAQS. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 159–163. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1402_03
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Gotlieb, M. R., & Lee, N.-J. (2009). Framing and agenda setting. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 83–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J. (2012). The psychology of quality of life: Hedonic well-being, life satisfaction, and eudaimonia. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-4405-9
   Google Scholar
• Sointu, E. (2005). The rise of an ideal: Tracing changing discourses of wellbeing. The Sociological Review, 53, 255–274. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00513.x
   Google Scholar
• Steger, M. F., Shin, J. Y., Shim, S., & Fitch-Martin, A. (2013). Is meaning in life a flagship indicator of well-being? In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 159–182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14092-000
   Google Scholar
• Tekstlab. (2015). The text laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.hf.uio.no/iln/english/about/organization/text-laboratory/services/frequency.html
   Google Scholar
• Tiberius, V. (2004). Cultural differences and philosophical accounts of well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 293–314. doi:10.1007/s10902-004-8791-y
   Google Scholar
• Tiberius, V. (2013). Recipes for a good life: Eudaimonism and the contribution of philopsophy. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 19–38). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/14092-000
   Google Scholar
• Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2007). Culture and subjective well-being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 691–713). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Türken, S., Nafstad, H. E., Blakar, R. M., & Roen, K. (2016). Making sense of neoliberal subjectivity: A discourse analysis of media language on self-development. Globalizations,  13, 32–46. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2015.1033247
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Gentile, B. (2013). Changes in pronoun use in American books and the rise of individualism, 1960–2008. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 406–415. doi:10.1177/0022022112455100
   Google Scholar
• Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 223–239. doi:10.1007/s10902-004-8785-9
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Verschueren, J. (2012). Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. (2007). Vernacular science knowledge: Its role in everyday life communication. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 7–22. doi:10.1177/0963662506071785
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (2004). ‘Happiness’ in cross-linguistic & cross-cultural perspective. Daedalus, 133(2), 34–43. doi:10.1162/001152604323049370
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (2009). Language and metalanguage: Key issues in emotion research. Emotion Review, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1177/1754073908097175
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wollebæk, D., & Strømsnes, K. (2008). Voluntary associations, trust, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 249–263. doi:10.1177/0899764007304754
   Google Scholar
• Wong, P. T. P. (2012). Towards a dual-systems mode of what makes life worth living. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, J. (2010). Authorizing happiness: Rhetorical demarcation of science and society in historical narratives of positive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 30, 67–78. doi:10.1037/a0019103
   Google Scholar