Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA

References

• Arditte, K. A., Çek, D., Shaw, A. M., & Timpano, K. R. (2016). The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in mechanical Turk research. Psychological Assessment, 28, 684–691.10.1037/pas0000217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R. E., Blas, L. D., … De Raad, B. (2004). A Six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 208–211.10.1080/17439760902844400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago, IL: Aldin.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 290–314.10.1177/1088868310391271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6, 1–48.10.5502/ijw
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174794
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., & Kirby, J. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods and Research, 29, 468–508.10.1177/0049124101029004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Page, A. (2016). Stability and instability of subjective well-being in the transition from adolescence to young adulthood: Longitudinal evidence from 20991 young Australians. PLoS ONE, 11, e0156399.10.1371/journal.pone.0156399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225.10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, J. K., Wray-Lake, L., Mashek, D., & Branand, B. (2016). A multi-study examination of well-being theory in college and community samples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 187–211.10.1007/s10902-014-9590-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, W. C. (2001). Toward a tripartite factor structure of mental health: Subjective well-being, personal growth, and religiosity. The Journal of Psychology, 135, 486–500.10.1080/00223980109603714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. J., Melchert, T. P., & Connor, K. (2016). Measuring well-being: A review of instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 44, 730–757.10.1177/0011000016633507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.10.1037/h0040957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Heintzelman, S. J., Kushlev, K., Tay, L., Wirtz, D., Lutes, L. D., & Oishi, S. (2017). Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology/psychologie canadienne, 58, 87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219.10.1016/S1566-3124(03)15007-9
   Google Scholar
• Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 471–482.10.1037/pas0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgeard, M. J. C., Jayawickreme, E., Kern, M. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2011). Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1, 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. W., Lopez, S. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77, 1025–1050.10.1111/jopy.2009.77.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hone, L. C., Jarden, A., Schofield, G., & Duncan, S. (2014). Measuring flourishing: The impact of operational definitions on the prevalence of high levels of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 4, 62–90.10.5502/ijw
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837–861.10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York, NY: Basic Books.10.1037/11258-000
   Google Scholar
• Jayawickreme, E., Forgeard, M. J., & Seligman, M. E. (2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology, 16, 327–342.10.1037/a0027990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A. (2005). Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from web-based personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 103–129.10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo, M. (2016a). A new look at the factor structure of the MHC-SF in Iran and the United States using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 701–713.10.1002/jclp.2016.72.issue-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo, M. (2016b). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2023–2036.10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo, M., Jose, P. E., & Kiepikowski, M. (2017). The value of exploratory structural equation modeling in identifying factor overlap in the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF): A study with a New Zealand sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 1061–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo, M., & Lamers, S. M. A. (2016). Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 8–12.10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, V. (2015). Structural validity of the mental health continuous-short form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 154–159.10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B. (2004). The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire). Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1225–1232.10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00213-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.10.1080/17439760802303044
   Google Scholar
• Kern, M. L., Waters, L., Adler, A., & White, M. (2014). Assessing employee wellbeing in schools using a multifaceted approach: Associations with physical health, life satisfaction, and professional thriving. Psychology, 5, 500–513.10.4236/psych.2014.56060
   Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140.10.2307/2787065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 179–196.10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W. (2004). Toward a unifying theoretical and practical perspective on well-being and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 482–509.10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R. (2009). Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 878–884.10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton, M. J., Dieppe, P., Medina-Lara, A., Watson, L., & Crathorne, L. (2016). Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: Exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. British Medical Journal Open, 6, e010641.10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, Y., Coyne, I., & Joseph, S. (2017). The scales of general well-being (SGWB). Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 148–159.10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, Y., Coyne, I., Joseph, S., & Gustavsson, P. (2016). Support for a general factor of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 68–72.10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819.10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person- and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 191–225.10.1080/10705510902751010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 2, 551–611.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 494–512.10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide. (Seventh Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C (2008). Beyond self-report in the study of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: Correlations with acquaintance reports, clinician judgments and directly observed social behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 643–659.10.1016/j.jrp.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619.10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patry, J. (2013). Beyond multiple methods: Critical multiplism on all levels. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 7, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 17–26.10.1080/17439760500372739
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2, 149–156.10.1080/17439760701228938
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook of classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2013). What good are character strengths beyond subjective well-being? The contribution of the good character on self-reported health-oriented behavior, physical fitness, and the subjective health status. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 222–232.10.1080/17439760.2013.777767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, S. (2004). Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: The theory of 16 basic desires. Review of General Psychology, 8, 179–193.10.1037/1089-2680.8.3.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (1984). Empirical identification, Heywood cases, and related problems in confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 13, 109–119.10.1177/0049124184013001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Bogg, T. (2005). Conscientiousness and health across the life course. Review of General Psychology, 9, 156–168.10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Huta, V. (2009). Wellness as healthy functioning or wellness as happiness: The importance of eudaimonic thinking (response to the Kashdan et al. and Waterman discussion). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 202–204.10.1080/17439760902844285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the big five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 613–627.10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness, well-being-and how to achieve them. Nicholas Brealey Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K. (2016). Putting eudaimonia in its place: On the predictor, not the outcome, side of the equation. In J. Vitterso (Ed.), Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-being (pp. 531–542). Switzerland: Springer International.10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3
   Google Scholar
• Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 22–42.10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (in press). Unique associations between big five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of Personality.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, C. M. (2006). Careless responding to reverse-worded items: Implications forconfirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 28, 189–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar