To give or to take money? The effects of choice on prosocial spending and happiness

References

• Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013b). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aknin, L. B., Broesch, T., Hamlin, J. K., & Van De Vondervoort, J. W. (2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 144(4), 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012a). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Whillans, A. V., Grant, A. M., & Norton, M. I. (2013a). Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spending. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 88, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012b). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS ONE, 7(6), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, S., Falk, A., Heidhues, P., Jayaraman, R., & Teirlinck, M. (2019). Defaults and donations: Evidence from a field experiment. The Review of Economics and Statistics,101(5), 808–826. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonovi, F. (2008). Doing well by doing good. The relationship between formal volunteering and self-reported health and happiness. Social Science & Medicine, 66(11), 2321–2334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. S., White, M. P., & Pahl, S. (2011). The impact of excess choice on deferment of decisions to volunteer. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(7), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., Van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidai, S., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. D. (2012). The meaning of default options for potential organ donors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(38), 15201–15205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211695109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhingra, N., Gorn, Z., Kener, A., & Dana, J. (2012). The default pull: An experimental demonstration of subtle default effects on preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(1), 69–76. http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10831a/jdm10831a.html
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinner, I., Johnson, E. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Liu, K. (2011). Partitioning default effects: Why people choose not to choose. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. W., & Ashton-James, C. (2008). On emotional innumeracy: Predicted and actual affective responses to grand-scale tragedies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, then you probably aren’t spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Västfjäll, D., Tinghög, G., & Nilsson, A. (2018). Donations to outgroup-charities, but not ingroup-charities, predict helping intentions towards street-beggars in Sweden. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(4), 814–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018819872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geenen, N. Y. R., Hohelüchter, M., Langholf, V., & Walther, E. (2014). The beneficial effects of prosocial spending on happiness: Work hard, make money, and spend it on others? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.891154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T. (2006). Stumbling on happiness. Harper press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, A. E., & Spiller, S. A. (2016). Opportunity cost neglect attenuates the effect of choices on preferences. Psychological Science, 27(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615608267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagman, W., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2015). Public views on policies involving nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, B. P. H., Ng, J. C. K., Berzaghi, E., Cunningham-Amos, L. A., & Kogan, A. (2020). Rewards of kindness? A meta-analysis of the link between prosociality and well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 146(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000298
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jachimowicz, J., Duncan, S., Weber, E., & Johnson, E. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 3(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2018.43
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338–1339. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. Y., & Mellers, B. A. (2016). American attitudes toward nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 62–74. http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15824a/jdm15824a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Schkade, D. (1998). Does living in california make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 9(5), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobau, R., Sniezek, J., Zack, M. M., Lucas, R. E., & Burns, A. (2010). Well-being assessment: An evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-being, 2(3), 272–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01035.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz, J. L. (2015). Affective forecasting: Teaching a useful, accessible, and humbling area of research. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, L., Passmore, H. A., & Holder, M. D. (2015). Foundational frameworks of positive psychology: Mapping well-being orientations. Canadian Psychology, 56(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moche, H., Erlandsson, A., Andersson, D., & Västfjäll, D. (2020). Opportunity cost in monetary donation decisions to non-identified and identified victims. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(January), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03035
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. K., Della Porta, M. D., Jacobs Bao, K., Lee, H. C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). “It’s up to you’: Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.983959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachur, T., & Spaar, M. (2015). Domain-specific preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirin, M., & Bode, R. C. (2014). An alternative to self-reports of trait and state affect. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirin, M., Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2009). When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The implicit positive and negative affect test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, A., Schwartz, B., & Guan, Y. (2012). The tyranny of choice: A cross-cultural investigation of maximizing-satisficing effects on well-being. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(6), 689–704. http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12815/jdm12815.html
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. (2000). Self-determination. The tyranny of freedom. American Psychologist, 55(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, M., Fitzgerald, M. P.,Gurley-Calvez, T.&Pellillo, A. (2011). Active versus passive choice: Evidence from a public health care redesign. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.2.191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghamee, H. S., Messer, K. D.,Fooks, J. R.&Schulze, W. D.Wu, S.&Yan, J. (2017). Nudging charitable giving: Three field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 66, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar