Potential contributions of intellectual humility when reading on the Internet

References

• Ballantyne, N. (2023). Recent work on intellectual humility: A philosopher’s perspective. Journal of Positive Psychology. doi:10.1080/17439760.2021.1940252.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Graesser, A. C. (2020). Avoiding and overcoming misinformation on the Internet. In R. J. Sternberg & D. F. Halpern (Eds.), Critical thinking in psychology (2nd) ed., pp. 125–151). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Kessler, E. D. (2021). Towards a theoretical model of source comprehension in everyday discourse. Discourse Processes, 58(5–6), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1905393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Scharrer, L. 2020. The role of cognitive conflict in understanding and learning from multiple perspectives. To appear in. In P. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi, & P. Kendeou, (Eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives. Routledge; Educational Psychology Series. 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using the Internet. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 879–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0145-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Stadtler, M., & Salmerón, L. (2018). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In M. F. Schober, M. A. Britt, & D. N. Rapp (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd.) ed., pp. 141–161). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Durik, A. M. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension: A theory of purposeful reading. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deffler, S. A., Leary, M. R., & Hoyle, R. H. (2016). Knowing what you know: Intellectual humility and judgments of recognition memory. Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L. E., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research (pp. 317–351). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., Davisson, E. K., Diebels, K. J., & Leary, M. R. (2016). Holding specific views with humility: Conceptualization and measurement of specific intellectual humility. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krumrei-Mancuso, E. J., & Rouse, S. V. (2016). The development and validation of the comprehensive intellectual humility scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1068174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., Diebels, K. J., Davisson, E. K., Jongman-Sereno, K. P., Isherwood, J. C., Raimi Deffler, S. A., Hoyle, R. H., & Hoyle, R. H. (2017). Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(6), 793–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217697695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual- level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th) ed., pp. 1150–1181). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, T., Muilwijk, R., Noordzij, M. L., & Schraagen, J. M. (2013). Topic familiarity and information skills in online credibility evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, S. E., Rice, K. G., Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Hill, P. C., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2014). Intellectual humility: Scale development and theoretical elaborations in the context of religious leadership. The Journal of Psychology and Theology, 42(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711404200103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, B. R., Leman, J. C., Bias, J. P., Latendresse, S. J., & Rowatt, W. C. (2015). Contrasting self-report and consensus ratings of intellectual humility and arrogance. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T., & Schumann, K. (2018). Intellectual humility and openness to the opposing view. Self and Identity, 17(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1361861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Kammerer, Y., & Delgado, P. 2018. Non-academic multiple source use on the Internet. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden, (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use. Routledge; 2018. 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zmigrod, L., Zmigrod, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2019). The psychological roots of intellectual humility: The role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 141(15), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.016
   Google Scholar