Integrating data across digital activities

References

• Almond, R. G., L. V. DiBello, B. Moulder, and J.-D. Zapata-Rivera. 2007. “Modeling Diagnostic Assessments with Bayesian Networks.” Journal of Educational Measurement 44 (4): 341–359. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, R. G., V. J. Shute, J. S. Underwood, and D. Zapata-Rivera. 2009. “Bayesian Networks: A Teacher's View.” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 50 (3): 450–460. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2008.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arieli-Attali, M., E. C. Wylie, and M. Bauer. 2012. “The Use of Three Learning Progressions in Supporting Formative Assessment.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, CA, April 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. S. J. d., A. T. Corbett, and V. Aleven. 2008. “More Accurate Student Modeling through Contextual Estimation of Slip and Guess Probabilities in Bayesian Knowledge Tracing.” In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, edited by B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, and S. Lajoie, 406–415. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_44
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, J. T., and K. E. DiCerbo. 2013. Technological Implications for Assessment Ecosystems: Opportunities for Digital Technology to Advance Assessment. Princeton, NJ: The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and N. R. Draper. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cassandra, A. R. 1998. “A Survey of POMDP Applications.” Working Notes of AAAI 1998 Fall Symposium on Planning with Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes, 17–24. http://www.cassandra.org/pomdp/papers/applications.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., and R. Halverson. 2009. Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and the Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., and J. R. Anderson. 1994. “Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge.” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4 (4): 253–278. doi: 10.1007/BF01099821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T., F. A. Mosher, and A. Rogat. 2009. Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform (No. CPRE Research Report #RR-63). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Data, data everywhere. 2010. “Data, Data Everywhere.” The Economist, February 25. http://www.economist.com/node/15557443
   Google Scholar
• DiCerbo, K. E. 2009. “Communicating with Instructors about Complex Data Analysis.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• DiCerbo, K. E. 2014. “Game-Based Assessment of Persistence.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 17 (1): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCerbo, K., and J. Behrens. 2012. “Implications of the Digital Ocean on Current and Future Assessment.” In Computers and Their Impact on State Assessment: Recent History and Predictions for the Future, edited by R. Lissitz and H. Jiao, 273–306. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. 2011. The Internet of Things: How the Next Evolution of the Internet is Changing Everything. San Jose, CA: Cisco. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/docs/innov/IoT_IBSG_0411FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gray, L., N. Thomas, and L. Lewis. 2010. “Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in US Public Schools: 2009. First Look. NCES 2010–040.” Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., H. Swaminathan, and H. J. Rogers. 1991. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Heckerman, D. 1995. “A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks (No. Technical Report MSR-TR-95–06).” Redmond, WA: Microsoft. http://www.cs.utsa.edu/~bylander/cs6243/heckerman96tutorial.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, F. V. 1996. An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, L. A., B. E. Clauser, and D. B. Swanson. 2010. “Using Multivariate Generalizability Theory to Assess the Effect of Content Stratification on the Reliability of a Performance Assessment.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 15 (5): 717–733. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9233-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, S. L., and D. J. Spiegelhalter. 1988. “Local Computations with Probabilities on Graphical Structures and Their Application to Expert Systems.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 50 (2): 157–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R., and R. Mislevy. 2004. “Specifying and Refining a Measurement Model for a Computer-Based Interactive Assessment.” International Journal of Testing 4 (4): 333–369. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0404_3
   Google Scholar
• Linzer, D. A., and J. Lewis. 2007. poLCA: Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis. R package version 1.0. http://dlinzer.bol.ucla.edu/poLCA
   Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, and A. H. Byers. 2011. Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity. New York, NY: McKinsey Global Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schonberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. 1st ed. Boston, MA: Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Millstone, J. 2012. “Teacher Attitudes about Digital Games in the Classroom.” New York, NY: Joan Ganz Cooney Center. http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/jgcc_teacher_survey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., L. S. Steinberg, and R. G. Almond. 2002. “Design and Analysis in Task-Based Language Assessment.” Language Testing 19 (4): 477–496. doi: 10.1191/0265532202lt241oa
   Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A. 2009. Foundations of Factor Analysis, Second Edition. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Research Council. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11625
   Google Scholar
• Owen, V. E., D. Ramirez, A. Salmon, and R. Halverson. 2014. “Capturing Learner Trajectories in Educational Games through ADAGE (Assessment Data Aggregator for Game Environments): A Click-Stream Data Framework for Assessment of Learning in Play.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, April 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. 1988. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., R. Levy, K. E. DiCerbo, S. Sweet, A. V. Crawford, T. Caliço, M. Benson, et al. 2012. “Putting ECD into Practice: The Interplay of Theory and Data in Evidence Models within a Digital Learning Environment.” Journal of Educational Data Mining 4: 49–110. http://educationaldatamining.org/JEDM/index.php/JEDM/article/view/23/13
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., J. Templin, and R. A. Henson. 2010. Diagnostic Measurement: Methodology in the Social Sciences. 1st ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. 1978. “Estimating the Dimension of a Model.” Annals of Statistics 6 (2): 461–464. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SellingttoSchools. n.d. “New Data Confirms Digital Shift.” http://www.sellingtoschools.com/articles/education-market-research-data-digital-shift-K12
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., E. G. Hansen, and R. G. Almond. 2008. “You Can't Fatten a Hog by Weighing It: Or Can You? Evaluating an Assessment for Learning System called ACED.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 18 (4): 289–316.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., M. Ventura, and Y. J. Kim. 2013. “Assessment and Learning of Qualitative Physics in Newton's Playground.” Journal of Educational Research 106 (6): 423–430. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.832970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, P., D. W. Rutstein, R. J. Mislevy, J. Liu, R. Levy, K. E. DiCerbo, A. Crawford, Y. Choi, K. Chappel, and J. T. Behrens. 2010. “A Bayesian Network Approach to Modeling Learning Progressions.” Los Angeles, CA: The National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, Student Testing (CRESST), Center for Studies in Education, UCLA. http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/download_report.asp?r=776
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D. M., R. G. Almond, R. J. Mislevy, and R. Levy. 2006. “An Application of Bayesian Networks in Automated Scoring of Computerized Simulation Tasks.” In Automated Scoring of Complex Tasks in Computer-Based Testing, edited by D. M. Williamson, R. J. Mislevy, and I. I. Bejar, 201–258. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zapata-Rivera, D. 2007. “Indirectly Visible Bayesian Student Models.” Proceedings of the 5th UAI Bayesian Modelling Applications Workshop, CEUR workshop proceedings (Vol. 268). http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-268/paper11.pdf
   Google Scholar