Digital technologies and the mediation of undergraduate students’ collaborative music compositional practices

References

• Airy, S., and J. M. Parr. 2001. “MIDI, Music and ME: Student's Perspectives on Composing with MIDI.” Music Education Research 3 (1): 41–9. doi: 10.1080/14613800020029941
   Google Scholar
• Arvaja, M. 2007. “Contextual Resources in Meaning Negotiations of a Student Pair in a Web-Based History Project.” International Journal of Educational Research 46: 215–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Arvaja, M. 2008. “Discursive Approach for Studying Contexts in Students’ Collaborative Activity.” Paper presented at the International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Utrecht, The Netherlands. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1599818.
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, C. 2007. “The Discipline that Never Was: Current Developments in Music Technology in Higher Education in Britain.” Journal of Music, Technology and Education 1 (1): 7–21. doi: 10.1386/jmte.1.1.7_1
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. 2007. “Reframing Creativity and Technology: Promoting Pedagogic Change in Music Education.” Journal of Music, Technology and Education 1 (1): 37–55. doi: 10.1386/jmte.1.1.37_1
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. 2012. Musical Creativities in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, C. 2004. “Assessing the Creative Work of Groups.” In Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by D. Miell and K. Littleton, 52–64. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2000. Creativity Across the Primary Curriculum: Framing and Developing Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, A. 2011. Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, T. 2004. “Theory, Technology and the Music Curriculum.” British Journal of Music Education 21 (2): 215–221. doi: 10.1017/S0265051704005650
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C. 2000. Motivation and the Ecology of Collaborative Learning. In Rethinking Collaborative Learning, edited by R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner, and D. Miell, 161–178. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1992. Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, T. 2004. “‘It's in the Mix Baby’: Exploring How Meaning is Created Within Music Technology Collaborations.” In Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by D. Miell and K. Littleton, 144–157. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, S. 2012. “An Open-Source Approach to Music Education Through jam2jam XO.” Journal of Music, Technology & Education 5 (2): 171–180. doi: 10.1386/jmte.5.2.171_1
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, E. D., 2012. “An Investigation of the Processes of Interdisciplinary Creative Collaboration: The Case of Music Technology Students Working Within the Performing Arts.” PhD diss., Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, E. D., R. Flewitt, K. Littleton, and D. Miell. 2011. “Studio Based Composers in Collaboration: A Socioculturally Framed Study.” Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 2011: 373–376.
   Google Scholar
• Grossen, M. 2008. “Methods for Studying Collaborative Creativity: An Original and Adventurous Blend.” Thinking Skills and Creativity. 3: 246–249. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, A. 2002. “A Comparative Analysis of Process and Product with Specialist and Generalist Pre-service Teachers Involved in a Group Composition Activity.” Music Education Research 4 (1): 25–36. doi: 10.1080/14613800220119750
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, M., ed. 2003. Why and How to Teach Music Composition. Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education (MENC).
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, P. R. 2007. “An Investigation of the Composing Strategies Employed by GCSE Music Students in a Computer-Mediated Environment.” M.Phil. diss., University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, P. R. 2010. “Exploring contexts for development: secondary music students' computer-mediated composing.” Journal of Music, Technology and Education 3 (2): 107–124. doi: 10.1386/jmte.3.2-3.107_1
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. 2000. Introducing Sociocultural Theory. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, edited by J. P. Lantolfz, 1–26. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Malham, D. G., and A. Myatt. 1995. “3-D Sound Spatialization using Ambisonic Techniques.” Computer Music Journal 19 (4): 58–79. doi: 10.2307/3680991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNichol, A. 2012. “Exploring an Extended Sound Universe for Composing in 11–14 Music Curricula.” Proceedings of the electroacoustic music studies network conference.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2013. Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miell, D., K. Littleton, and S. Rojas-Drummond. 2008. “Collaborative creativity: sociocultural perspectives.” Thinking Skills and Creativity. 3 (3): 175–176. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaidou, G. 2012. “ComPLuS Model: A New Insight in Pupils’ Collaborative Talk, Actions and Balance During a Computer-Mediated Music Task.” Computers and Education 58: 740–765. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, S. 2010. “Collaborating or Fighting for the Marks? Students’ Experiences of Group Work Assessment in the Creative Arts.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 301–313. doi: 10.1080/02602931003632357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saljo, R. 2010. “Digital Tools and Challenges to Institutional Traditions of Learning: Technologies, Social Memory and the Performative Nature of Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 26: 53–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, J. 2005. “Working Towards a Theory for Music Technologies in the Classroom: How Pupils Engage with and Organize Sounds with New Technologies.” British Journal of Music Education 22 (2): 167–180. doi: 10.1017/S0265051705006133
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., and J. Savage. 2007. “DubDubDub: Improvisation using the Sounds of the World Wide Web.” Journal of Music, Technology and Education 1 (1): 83–96. doi: 10.1386/jmte.1.1.83_1
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K., and S. DeZutter. 2009. “Distributed Creativity: How Collective Creations Emerge from Collaboration.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3 (2): 81–92. doi: 10.1037/a0013282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, F. A., and S. A. O'Neill. 2012. “Creative Thinking Processes in Adolescent Computer-Based Compositions: An Analysis of Strategies Adopted and the Influence of Instrumental Music Training.” Music Education Research 5 (2): 125–35. doi: 10.1080/1461380032000085513
   Google Scholar
• Vass, E. 2004. Understanding Collaborative Creativity: Young Children's Classroom-based shared creative writing. In Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by D. Miell and K. Littleton, 79–95. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: Interaction Between Learning and Development. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–482. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1979. “From Social Interaction to Higher Psychological Processes: A Clarification and Application of Vygotsky's Theory.” Human Development. 22: 1–22. doi: 10.1159/000272425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar