New literacies practices of teenage Twitter users

References

• Alvermann, Donna E. 2008. “Why Bother Theorizing Adolescents’ Online Literacies for Classroom Practice and Research?” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (1): 8–19. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, Rebecca W. 2006. “Language, Culture, and Identity in Online Fanfiction.” E-learning and Digital Media 3 (2): 170–184.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Rebecca W. 2009. “English-Language Learners, Fan Communities, and 21st-Century Skills.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (8): 688–697. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.8.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, Danah. 2008. “Why Youth Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, edited by David Buckingham, 119–142. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Deborah, and Katie Clinton. 2002. “Limits of the Local: Expanding Perspectives on Literacy as a Social Practice.” Journal of Literacy Research 34 (3): 337–356. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, Julie, Michele Knobel, Colin Lankshear, and Donald J. Leu. 2008. “Central Issues in New Literacies and New Literacies Research.” In Handbook of Research on New Literacies, Julie Coiro, Michele Knobel, Colin Lankshear, and Donald J. Leu, 1–21. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate. 2009. “Following You: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 23 (4): 525–535. doi: 10.1080/10304310903003270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Katie, and Carrie James. 2013. “Tweens’ Conceptions of Privacy Online: Implications for Educators.” Learning, Media and Technology 38 (1): 4–25. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2012.658404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The Selfish Gene. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, Myrrh. 2012. “Linguistic Layering: Social Language Development in the Context of Multimodal Design and Digital Technologies.” Learning, Media and Technology 37 (2): 177–197. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2012.670645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elavsky, C. Michael, Cristina Mislan, and Steriani Elavsky. 2011. “When Talking Less is More: Exploring Outcomes of Twitter Usage in the Large-Lecture Hall.” Learning, Media and Technology 36 (3): 215–233. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2010.549828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, Joe. 2013. “ The Hashtag: A History Deeper Than Twitter.” http://www.copypress.com/blog/the-hashtag-a-history-deeper-than-twitter.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, Norm, and S. Lowe. 2012. “The Questionable Promise of Social Media for Education: Connective Learning and the Commercial Imperative.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28 (3): 183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00426.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Fei, Tian Luo, and Ke Zhang. 2012. “Tweeting for Learning: A Critical Analysis of Research on Microblogging in Education Published in 2008–2011.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 783–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, James. 2015. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillen, Julia, and Guy Merchant. 2013. “Contact Calls: Twitter as a Dialogic Social and Linguistic Practice.” Language Sciences 35: 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, Benjamin. 2013. “# Occupy Wall Street: Exploring Informal Learning About a Social Movement on Twitter.” American Behavioral Scientist. doi:10.1177/0002764213479372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, Benjamin. 2014. “Baktin(s) Love Twitter: Digital Literacies and Identity Performances of Adolescent Twitter Users.” Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C. 2011. “Research Methods Unique To Digital Contexts: An Introduction to Virtual Ethnography.” In Literacy Research Methodologies, edited by N. Duke and M. H. Mallette, 70–86. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, Christine, and Benjamin Gleason. 2012. “Twitteracy: Tweeting as a New Literacy Practice.” The Educational Forum 76 (4): 464–478. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2012.709032
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, Kris D., and Barbara Rogoff. 2003. “Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice.” Educational researcher 32 (5): 19–25. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032005019
   Google Scholar
• Hull, Glynda A., and Amy Stornaiuolo. 2014. “Cosmopolitan Literacies, Social Networks, and ‘Proper Distance': Striving To Understand in a Global World.” Curriculum Inquiry 44 (1): 15–44. doi: 10.1111/curi.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell H., and John Joseph Gumperz, eds. 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Gloria E. 2008. “We Learn What We Do: Developing a Repertoire of Writing Practices in an Instant Messaging World.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52 (3): 203–211. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, Barbara. 2008. Discourse Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Journell, Wayne, Cheryl A. Ayers, and Melissa Walker Beeson. 2013. “Joining the Conversation: Twitter as a Tool for Student Political Engagement.” The Educational Forum 77 (4): 466–480. doi: 10.1080/00131725.2013.822039
   Google Scholar
• Junco, Reynol, Greg Heiberger, and Eric Loken. 2011. “The Effect of Twitter on College Student Engagement and Grades.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (2): 119–132. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, David E. 2009. “Standpoints: Researching and Teaching English in the Digital Dimension.” Research in the Teaching of English 44 (1): 8–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krutka, Daniel, and Michael K. Milton. 2013. “The Enlightenment Meets Twitter: Using Social Media in the Social Studies Classroom.” The Ohio Social Studies Review 50 (2): 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, Haewoon, Changhyun Lee, Hosung Park, and Sue Moon. 2010. “What is Twitter, A Social Network or a NewsMedia?” Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, April 26–30, 591–600.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Wan Shun Eva. 2009. “Multiliteracies on Instant Messaging in Negotiating Local, Translocal, and Transnational Affiliations: A Case of an Adolescent Immigrant.” Reading Research Quarterly 44 (4): 377–397. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.44.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, Kevin M. 2003. “Writing Travelers’ Tales on New Literacyscapes.” Reading Research Quarterly 38 (3): 392–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, Kevin, and Gail Boldt. 2013. “Rereading ‘A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies' Bodies, Texts, and Emergence.” Journal of Literacy Research 45 (1): 22–46. doi: 10.1177/1086296X12468587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, Jay L. 2012. “Thinking About Feeling: Affect Across Literacies and Lives.” In Identity, Community, and Learning Lives in the Digital Age, edited by Ola Erstad and Julian Sefton-Green, 57–69. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Cynthia, and Bettina Fabos. 2005. “Instant Messaging, Literacies, and Social Identities.” Reading Research Quarterly 40 (4): 470–501. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Cynthia, and Jessica Dockter Tierney. 2011. “Mobilizing Emotion in an Urban English Classroom.” Changing English 18 (3): 319–329. doi: 10.1080/1358684X.2011.602840
   Google Scholar
• Luxton, David D., Jennifer D. June, and Jonathan M. Fairall. 2012. “Social Media and Suicide: A Public Health Perspective.” American Journal of Public Health 102 (S2): S195–S200. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, Mary, Amanda Lenhart, Sandra Cortesi, Urs Gasser, Maeve Duggan, Aaron Smith, and Meredith Beaton. 2013. “Teens, Social Media, and Privacy.” Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, Alice, and Danah Boyd. 2014. “‘It's Just Drama’: Teen Perspectives on Conflict and Aggression in a Networked Era.” Journal of Youth Studies 17 (9): 1187–1204. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2014.901493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Vincent. 2008. “New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14 (4): 387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, Elizabeth. 2000. “To Be Part of the Story: The Literacy Practices of Gangsta Adolescents.” The Teachers College Record 102 (3): 651–690. doi: 10.1111/0161-4681.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandya, Jessica, and JuliAnna Ávila, eds. 2013. Moving Critical Literacies Forward: A New Look at Praxis Across Contexts. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, Django. 2010. “Texting Identities: Lessons for Classrooms from Multiethnic Youth Space.” English Education 42 (3): 278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, Kristen, Judy Buchanan, and Linda Friedrich. 2013. “The Impact of Digital Tools on Student Writing and How Writing is Taught in Schools.” Pew Internet and the American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/07/16/the-impact-of-digital-tools-on-student-writing-and-how-writing-is-taught-in-schools/.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, Harrison, and Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richtel, Matt. 2012. “Wasting Time is New Divide in Digital Era.” The New York Times 29.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, Shannon B., Suzanne Tapp, and Debra A. Laverie. 2011. “Learning by Tweeting: Using Twitter as a Pedagogical Tool.” Journal of Marketing Education 33 (2): 193–203. doi: 10.1177/0273475311410852
   Google Scholar
• Risser, H. Smith. 2013. “Virtual Induction: A Novice Teacher's Use of Twitter to Form an Informal Mentoring Network.” Teaching and Teacher Education 35: 25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, Jeff, and Hester Tinti-Kane. 2013. “ Social Media for Teaching and Learning.” Pearson Learning Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, Neil. 2010. “Looking Beyond Learning: Notes towards the Critical Study of Educational Technology.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (1): 65–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, Robert. 2000. “Case Studies.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Roger Gomm, Martyn Hammersley, and Peter Foster, 435–454. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Street, Brian V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Vol. 9. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–93. doi: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitter.com. “What are @Replies and Mentions.” https://support.twitter.com/articles/14023-what-are-replies-and-mentions.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, José. 2013. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yagelski, Robert P. 2009. “A Thousand Writers Writing: Seeking Change through the Radical Practice of Writing as a Way of Being.” English Education 42 (1): 6–28.
   Google Scholar
• Zak, Elana. 2013. “How Twitter's Hashtag Came To be.” Accessed April 28, 2014. http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/10/03/how-twitters-hashtag-came-to-be.
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr, Kathryn, and Lee Rainie. 2014. “ Younger Americans and Public Libraries.” Pew Research Internet Project. www.pewinternet.org.
   Google Scholar