‘But this isn’t school’: exploring tensions in the intersection between school and leisure activities in classroom game design

References

• Aarsand, Pål André. 2008. “Frame Switches and Identity Performances: Alternating between Online and Offline.” Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 28 (2): 147–165. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2008.007
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Sanne F., and Arthur Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barne- ungdoms- og familiedirektoratet. 2016. “Barn Og Unges Mediebruk [Children and Young People’s Media Usage].” https://www.bufdir.no/Statistikk_og_analyse/Oppvekst/Fritid/Barn_og_unges_mediebruk/#heading7789.
   Google Scholar
• Bate, Frank, Jean MacNish, and Steven Males. 2014. “The Politics of Gaming in Schools: A Sociocultural Perspective from Western Australia.” Learning, Media and Technology 39 (3): 306–327. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.872655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beavis, Catherine, Sandy Muspratt, and Roberta Thompson. 2015. “‘Computer Games Can Get Your Brain Working’: Student Experience and Perceptions of Digital Games in the Classroom.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (1): 21–42. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.904339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, Glenn A. 2006. “Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (3): 12–23. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500304
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Elizabeth A., Thomas Hainey, Thomas M. Connolly, Grant Gray, Jeffrey Earp, Michela Ott, Theodore Lim, Manuel Ninaus, Claudia Ribeiro, and João Pereira. 2016. “An Update to the Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence of the Impacts and Outcomes of Computer Games and Serious Games.” Computers and Education 94: 178–192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee, Yam San, Swati Mehrotra, and Jing Chuan Ong. 2015. “Authentic Game-Based Learning and Teachers’ Dilemmas in Reconstructing Professional Practice.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (4): 514–535. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.953958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Allan, Diana Joseph, and Katerine Bielaczyc. 2004. “Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (1): 15–42. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, Sara I. 2006. “Using Games and Simulations for Supporting Learning.” Learning, Media and Technology 31 (4): 343–358. doi:10.1080/17439880601021967.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, André R., and Kelly W. Guyotte. 2017. “Cultivating Critical Game Makers in Digital Game-Based Learning: Learning from the Arts.” Learning, Media and Technology 3: 1–11. doi:10.1080/17439884.2017.1342655.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, Sharon J., Roy D. Pea, Brigid Barron, Randi A. Engle, Frederick Erickson, Ricki Goldman, Rogers Hall, et al. 2010. “Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (1): 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse : Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Pragmatics & Beyond: New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö, Ritva Engeström, and Merja Kärkkäinen. 1995. “Polycontextuality and Boundary Crossing in Expert Cognition: Learning and Problem Solving in Complex Work Activities.” Learning and Instruction 5: 319–336. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00021-6.
   Google Scholar
• Englebretson, Robert. 2007. “Stancetaking in Discourse: An Introduction.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, edited by Robert Englebretson, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Enterbrain. 2016. “Make Your Own Game with RPG Maker.” Accessed January 13. http://www.rpgmakerweb.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Entertainment Software Association. 2016. “2016 Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry.” http://essentialfacts.theesa.com/Essential-Facts-2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. “Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Benchmarking Access, Use and Attitudes to Technology in Europe’s Schools.” doi: 10.2759/94499
   Google Scholar
• Fine, Gary Alan. 1982. Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock. 2002. “Basic Meanings of You Know and I Mean.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00027-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, David, and Stephen Hester. 2004. An Invitation to Ethnomethodology: Language, Society and Interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis : An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper Torchbooks. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73. doi: 10.1177/0957926507069457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, Asta Cekaite, and Charles Goodwin. 2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, edited by Marja-Leena Sorjonen and Anssi Perakyla, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2004. “Participation.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by Alessandro Duranti, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, Christine, and Cathy Lewin. 2016. “Social Media and Education: Reconceptualizing the Boundaries of Formal and Informal Learning.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (1): 6–30. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guðmundsdóttir, Gréta Björk, Dina Dalaaker, Gunstein Egeberg, Ove Edvard Hatlevik, and Karoline Hultman Tømte. 2014. “Interactive Technology. Traditional Practice?” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 9 (1): 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, Erica Rosenfeld, and Kimberly M. Sheridan. 2014. “The Maker Movement in Education.” Harvard Educational Review 84 (4): 495–504. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Harry Potter Alliance. 2015. “The Harry Potter Alliance.” http://www.thehpalliance.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, Mark. 2014. The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. Kindle ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, Thomas, and Roger Säljö. 2016. “Learning, Knowing and Opportunities for Participation: Technologies and Communicative Practices.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (2): 306–309. doi:10.1080/17439884.2016.1167080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, Mizuko, Kris Gutiérrez, Sonia Livingstone, Bill Penuel, Jean Rhodes, Katie Salen, Juliet Schor, Julian Sefton-Green, and S. Craig Watkins. 2013. Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry, Mizuko Ito, and danah boyd. 2016. Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics. Kindle ed. Cambride, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry, Ravi Purushotma, Margaret Weigel, Katie Clinton, and Alice J. Robison. 2009. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, Carey. 2006. Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jucker, Andreas H., and Sara W. Smith. 1998. “And People Just You Know Like ‘Wow’: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies.” In Discourse Markers: Description and Theory, edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Y. Ziv, 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Yasmin B. 2006. “Playing and Making Games for Learning: Instructionist and Constructionist Perspectives for Game Studies.” Games and Culture 1 (1): 36–40. doi:10.1177/1555412005281767.
   Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2006. “Stance Taking in Conversation: From Subjectivity to Intersubjectivity.” Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 26 (6): 699–731. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.029
   Google Scholar
• Ke, Fengfeng. 2009. “A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Computer Games as Learning Tools.” In Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education, edited by Richard E. Ferdig, 1–32. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, Kay, and Claire Wyatt-Smith. 2006. “Using and Creating Knowledge with New Technologies: A Case for Students-as-Designers.” Learning, Media and Technology 31 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1080/17439880500515440.
   Google Scholar
• Kjällander, Susanne, Anna Åkerfeldt, and Petra Petersen. 2016. “Översikt Avseende Forskning Och Erfarenheter Kring Programmering I Förskola Och Grundskola [Overview of Research and Experiences Regarding Programming in Preschool and Elementary School].” http://omvarld.blogg.skolverket.se/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/06/oversikt_programmering_i_skolan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, Hubert. 2013. “Videography: Focused Ethnography and Video Analysis.” In Video Analysis: Methodology and Methods, edited by Hubert Knoblauch, Bernt Schnettler, and Juergen Raab, 69–83. Peter Lang GmbH. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lantz-Andersson, Annika, Sylvi Vigmo, and Rhonwen Bowen. 2016. “Students’ Frame Shifting – Resonances of Social Media in Schooling.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (2): 371–395. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1051051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melander, Helen, and Fritjof Sahlström. 2010. Lärande I Interaktion [Learning in Interaction]. Edited by Helen Melander and Fritjof Sahlström. Stockholm: Liber AB.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Neil. 2004. “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (2): 137–168. doi:10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, Neil, Rupert Wegerif, and Lyn Dawes. 1999. “Children’s Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom.” British Educational Research Journal 25 (1): 95–111. doi:10.1080/0141192990250107.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Research. 2017. “Kodu Game Lab Community.” Accessed August 21. https://www.kodugamelab.com/.
   Google Scholar
• MIT Media Lab. 2017. “Scratch – Imagine, Program, Share.” Accessed August 21. https://scratch.mit.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2012. Framework for Basic Skills. Oslo. https://www.udir.no/in-english/Framework-for-Basic-Skills/.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, Elinor. 1996. “Linguistic Resources for Socializing Humanity.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, edited by J. Gumperz and S. Levinson, 407–437. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour, and Idit Harel. 1991. “Situating Constructionism.” In Constructionism, 1–13. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, Kylie A., and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2007a. “From SuperGoo to Scratch: Exploring Creative Digital Media Production in Informal Learning.” Learning, Media and Technology 32 (2): 149–166. doi:10.1080/17439880701343337.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, Kylie A., and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2007b. “What Videogame Making Can Teach Us about Literacy and Learning: Alternative Pathways Into Participatory Culture.” In Situated Play: Proceedings of DIGRA 2007 Conference, edited by Akira Baba, 369–376. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Reimann, Peter. 2011. “Design-Based Research.” In Methodological Choice and Design, edited by Lina Markauskaite, Peter Freebody, and Jude Irwin, 9: 37–50. Methodos Series (Methodological Prospects in the Social Sciences). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8933-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Judy, and Judith Good. 2005. “Story Creation in Virtual Game Worlds.” Communications of the ACM 48 (1): 61–65. doi: 10.1145/1039539.1039571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2012. Shut down or Restart? The Way Forward for Computing in UK Schools. London. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/computing-in-schools/2012-01-12-computing-in-schools.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Salen, Katie. 2007. “Gaming Literacies: A Game Design Study in Action.” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 16 (3): 301–322.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, Roger. 2010. “Digital Tools and Challenges to Institutional Traditions of Learning: Technologies, Social Memory and the Performative Nature of Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (1): 53–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, Neil. 2016. “Minding Our Language: Why Education and Technology Is Full of Bullshit … and What Might Be Done about It.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (3): 437–443. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silseth, K., and H. C. Arnseth. 2016. “Frames for Learning Science: Analyzing Learner Positioning in a Technology-Enhanced Science Project.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (2): 396–415. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1100636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søby, Morten. 2013. “Synergies for Better Learning – Where Are We Now?” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 8 (01–02): 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Estrid. 2009. The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice. Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, Kurt. 2005. “Changing the Game: What Happens When Video Games Enter the Classroom?” Innovate: Journal of Online Education 1 (6): 1. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss6/5. Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, Kurt. 2006. “From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience.” Educational Researcher 35 (8): 19–29. doi:10.3102/0013189X035008019.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, Kurt. 2008. “Open-Ended Video Games: A Model for Developing Learning for the Interactive Age.” In The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, edited by Katie Salen, 167–198. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.1162/dmal.9780262693646.167.
   Google Scholar
• Utdanningsdirektoratet. 2013. “Social Studies Subject Curriculum.” https://www.udir.no/kl06/SAF1-03/Hele/Grunnleggende_ferdigheter?lplang=http://data.udir.no/kl06/eng.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Alf Inge. 2011. “Survey on How Norwegian Teenagers Play Video Games.” In 2011 IEEE International Games Innovation Conference (IGIC), 26–28. Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Feng, and Michael J. Hannafin. 2005. “Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (4): 5–23. doi:10.1007/BF02504682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar