The uses of (digital) literacy

References

• Apperley, T., D. Jayemanne, and B. Nansen. 2016. “Postdigital Literacies: Materiality, Mobility and the Aesthetics of Recruitment.” In Literacy, Media, Technology: Past, Present and Future. edited by B. Parry, C. Burnett, and G. Merchant. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Asbjornsen, D., E. Bevort, E. De Vos, S. Eggert, A. Falconi, S. Pereira, and T. Verbist. 2016. “Discovering Media Together: Why Good Parenting also Includes Media Education.” In Media Literacy in Europe: Inspiring Ways to Involve Parents, edited by S. Eggert, and T. Verbist, 6–9. Antwerp: Evens Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Avila, J., and J. Pandya, eds. 2012. Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis: Intersections and Challenges. New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Vol. 54. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1956. “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.” In Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain, edited by B. S Bloom. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brotherton, G., and M. Cronin, eds. 2014. Working with Vulnerable Children, Young People and Families. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. 2003. Media Education: Literacy, Learning and Contemporary Culture. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. 2015. “Digital distractions: What’s Wrong with the Debate About Technology in Education.” http://davidbuckingham.net/2015/09/25/digital-distractions-whats-wrong-with-the-debate-about-technology-in-education/.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. 2014. “Investigating Pupils’ Interactions Around Digital Texts: A Spatial Perspective on the ‘Classroom-Ness’ of Digital Literacy Practices in Schools.” Educational Review 66 (2): 192–209. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2013.768959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., G. Merchant, and B. Parry, eds. 2016. Literacy, Media and Technology: Past, Present and Future. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, B., and S. Svanaes. 2014. An Updated Literature Review of the Use of Tablets in Education. London: Tablets 4 Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Ehret, C. 2016. “Mapping Place, Affect, and Futures in an Adolescent's New Media Making: Schizoanalytic Cartographies.” In Literacy, Media, Technology: Past, Present and Future, edited by R. Parry, C. Burnett, and G. Merchant, 93–108. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• European Audiovisual Observatory/Council of Europe. 2016. Mapping of Media Literacy Practices and Actions in UE-28. Brussels: European Audiovisual Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Evens Foundation. 2016. Media Literacy in Europe: Finding Ways to Involve Parents. Antwerp: Evens Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2004. Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. How to do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gov.UK. 2013. “Primary National Curriculum.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425601/PRIMARY_national_curriculum.pdf London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D. 2008. “Developing a Sociocritical Literacy in the Third Space.” Reading Research Quarterly 43 (2): 148–164. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoggart, R. 1957. The Uses of Literacy. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., and E. B. Moje. 2012. “What’s the Development of Literacy the Development Of?” Accessed February 16, 2018. http://ell.stanford.edu/publication/what-development-literacy-development.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G, and J. Zacher. 2010. “What Is After-School Worth? Developing Literacy and Identity Out of School.” Voices in Urban Education Winter (2010): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2011. “Transmedia 202: Further Reflections.” Blog Post, August 11. Accessed February 16, 2018. http://henryjenkins.org/2011/08/defining_transmedia_further_re.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jisc. 2017. “Building Digital Capability.” http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6611/1/JFL0066F_DIGIGAP_MOD_IND_FRAME.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 1992. The Action Research Planner. 3rd ed. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, A. 2015. “E-STEP Keynote Lecture.” International Conference in Open and Distance Learning, Athens, November 7.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and J. Sefton-Green. 2016. The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyds Bank. 2016. “Consumer Digital Index – Benchmarking the Digital and Financial Capability of UK Consumers.” http://www.lloydsbank.com/assets/media/pdfs/ConsumerDigitalIndex_280715AP_0116_v9_Web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., S. Livingstone, and J. Sefton-Green. 2014. “Media and Information Education in the UK: Report for Cost/ANR.” http://ppemi.ens-cachan.fr/data/media/colloque140528/rapports/UNITED-KINGDOM_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., and L. Pereira. 2017. “Digital Literacy and Education in the UK: COST Action IS1401 – Strengthening Europeans’ Capabilities by Establishing the European Literacy Network.” https://www.is1401eln.eu/fotos/editor2/meetings/uk_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., K. M. Ciechanowski, K. Kramer, L. Ellis, R. Carrillo, and T. Collazo. 2004. “Working Toward Third Space in Content Area Literacy: An Examination of Everyday Funds of Knowledge and Discourse.” Reading Research Quarterly 39 (1): 38–70. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. 1985. Portland, an Illustrated History. Wimborne: Dovecote Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2014. “How Does the Capability Approach Address Current Issues in Special Educational Needs, Disability and Inclusive Educational Field?” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 14 (1): 16–21. doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12012
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Trust. 2016. “Delivering the Benefits of Digital Healthcare.” https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/research/delivering-the-benefits-of-digital-health-care.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2015. “School Inspection Handbook.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-inspection-handbook-from-september-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. 2014. Materializing Literacies in Communities: The Uses of Literacy Revisited. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, S. 2016. “Why Parental Media Mediation is Important.” In Media Literacy in Europe: Inspiring Ways to Involve Parents, edited by S. Eggert, and T. Verbist, 10–13. Antwerp: Evens Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R., and A. Graham. 2010. “Exploring the Complementarities Between Complexity and Action Research: The Story of Technology Together.” Cambridge Journal of Education 40 (2): 183–197. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2010.481259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J. 2012. Digital Media and Learner Identity: The New Curatorship. New York.: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and T. Bryer. 2016. “Finger Flowment’ and Moving Image Language: Learning Filmmaking with Tablet Devices.” In Literacy, Media, Technology: Past, Present and Future, edited by R. Parry, C. Burnett, and G. Merchant, 93–108. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and J. McDougall. 2017. Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, R. 2010. “Through Many Voices, an Idea Is Born.” Building Smart Education Systems. Voices in Urban Education Winter 2010: 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Samsung. 2014. Samsung Digital Classroom: Key Findings. Surrey: Samsung.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, K, A Thorhauge, and B Valtysson. 2016. “The Media and the Mundane: Communication Across Media in Everyday Life.” In The Media and the Mundane: Communication Across Media in Everyday Life. Stockholm: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2014. Is Technology Good for Education. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 2005. “Human Rights and Capabilities.” Journal of Human Development 6 (2): 151–166. doi: 10.1080/14649880500120491
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 2008. “Capability and Well-Being.” In The Philosophy of Economics, edited by D. M. Hausman, 3rd ed., 270–293. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stornaiuolo, A., G. Hull, and M. Nelson. 2009. “Mobile Texts and Migrant Audiences: Rethinking Literacy and Assessment in a New Media Age.” Language Arts 86 (5): 382–392.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2003. “What’s “New” in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 5: 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Techknowledge. 2015. Research Overview 2015. London: Family, Kids and Youth. http://techknowledge.org.uk/research/research-reports/research-overview-2015/.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2005. “Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 39 (3): 443–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2005.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinder Foundation/Go ON UK. 2015. “The Economic Impact of Basic Digital Skills and Inclusion in the UK.” https://www.goodthingsfoundation.org/sites/default/files/researchpublications/the_economic_impact_of_digital_skills_and_inclusion_in_the_uk_final_v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, L., K. Rodriguez Kerr, M. Hibbert, E. Fernandez, and A. Park. 2014. “Cosmopolitan Literacies of Belonging in an After-School Program with Court-Involved Youths.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 57 (7): 538–548. doi: 10.1002/jaal.288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada-Rice, D. 2011. “New Media, Evolving Multimodal Literacy Practices and the Potential Impact of Increased Use of the Visual Mode in the Urban Environment on Young Children’s Learning.” Literacy 45 (1): 32–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4369.2011.00578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar