Leveraging technology: how Black girls enact critical digital literacies for social change

References

• Aaen, Janus, and Christian Dalsgaard. 2016. “Student Facebook Groups as a Third Space: Between Social Life and Schoolwork.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (1): 160–186. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Carrie D., and Margaret Eisenhart. 2017. “Fighting for Desired Versions of a Future Self: How Young Women Negotiated STEM-Related Identities in the Discursive Landscape of Educational Opportunity.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 26 (3): 407–436. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1294985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthias, Floya, and Nira Yuval-Davis. 1992. Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203992920.
   Google Scholar
• Askari, Emilia, Diana Brandon, Sarah Galvin, and Christine Greenhow. 2018. “Youth, Learning and Social Media in K-12 Education: The State of the Field.” ICLS 2018 Proceedings, 344–351.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila, JuliAnna, and Jessica Zacher Pandya. 2013. Critical Digital Literacies as Social Praxis: Intersections and Challenges. New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies. Vol. 54. New York, New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Riché J. Daniel. 2015. Raising the Race: Black Career Women Redefine Marriage, Motherhood, and Community. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, Brigid, Kimberley Gomez, Caitlin K. Martin, and Nichole Pinkard. 2014. The Digital Youth Network: Cultivating Digital Media Citizenship in Urban Communities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, Karen. 2000. “Global Capitalism: What’s Race Got to Do With It?” American Ethnologist 27 (2): 237–256. doi:10.1525/ae.2000.27.2.237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Melissa, Rashawn Ray, Ed Summers, and Neil Fraistat. 2017. “#SayHerName: A Case Study of Intersectional Social Media Activism.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (11): 1831–1846. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1334934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, Janet. 2017. “Black Women Are Besieged On Social Media, And White Apathy Damns Us All.” Forbes, December 27, 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/janetwburns/2017/12/27/black-women-are-besieged-on-social-media-and-white-apathy-damns-us-all/#756d690b423e.
   Google Scholar
• Carter Andrews, Dorinda J., Tashal Brown, Eliana Castro, and Effat Id-Deen. 2019. “The Impossibility of Being ‘Perfect and White’: Black Girls’ Racialized and Gendered Schooling Experiences.” American Educational Research Journal, May, 0002831219849392. doi:10.3102/0002831219849392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill. 2002. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd. New York, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill, and Sirma Bilge. 2016. Intersectionality. Malden, Massachusetts: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Combahee River Collective. 1986. The Combahee River Collective Statement: Black Feminist Organizing in the Seventies and Eighties. 1st. Albany, New York: Kitchen Table.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet M., and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Aimee Meredith. 2015. Shapeshifters: Black Girls and the Choreography of Citizenship. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams, and Andrea J. Ritchie. 2015. “Say Her Name: Resisting Police Brutality Against Black Women.” Center for Intersectionality and Policy Studies, Columbia Law School. http://static1.squarespace.com/static/53f20d90e4b0b80451158d8c/t/560c068ee4b0af26f72741df/1443628686535/AAPF_SMN_Brief_Full_singles-min.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dahya, Negin. 2017. “Critical Perspectives on Youth Digital Media Production: ‘Voice’ and Representation in Educational Contexts.” Learning, Media and Technology 42 (1): 100–111. doi:10.1080/17439884.2016.1141785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado Bernal, Dolores. 1998. “Using a Chicana Feminist Epistemology in Educational Research.” Harvard Educational Review 68 (4): 555–583. doi:10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de los Ríos, Cati V. 2018. “Bilingual Vine Making: Problematizing Oppressive Discourses in a Secondary Chicanx/Latinx Studies Course.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (4): 359–373. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1498350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drayton, Tiffany. 2016. “Is Social Media Enabling Black Girl-on-Girl Violence?” The Daily Dot, May 31, 2016. https://www.dailycom/irl/black-girl-fights-social-media/.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Daneell. 2005. “‘Doing Hair’ and Literacy in an Afterschool Reading and Writing Workshop for African-American Adolescent Girls.” Afterschool Matters. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068627.
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, Tisha Lewis, and David E. Kirkland. 2014. “Motherboards, Microphones and Metaphors: Re-Examining New Literacies and Black Feminist Thought through Technologies of Self.” E-Learning and Digital Media 11 (4): 390–405. doi:10.2304/elea.2014.11.4.390.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, Kerry Anne. 2011. “Language and Literacy for a New Mainstream.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (1): 80–118. doi:10.3102/0002831210368989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, Christen, and Petra Brysiewicz. 2013. “Orientation among Multiple Truths: An Introduction to Qualitative Research.” African Journal of Emergency Medicine 3 (2): 92–99. doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2012.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, Nelson, and Jonathan Rosa. 2015. “Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education.” Harvard Educational Review 85 (2): 149–171. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fordham, Signithia. 1993. “‘Those Loud Black Girls’: (Black) Women, Silence, and Gender ‘Passing’ in the Academy.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 24 (1): 3–32. doi:10.1525/aeq.1993.24.1.05x1736t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo, and Donaldo Macedo. 2005. Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203986103.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Patricia, Cecilia Henríquez Fernández, and Ashley Jackson. 2019. “Counternarratives of Youth Participation Among Black Girls.” Youth & Society, January, 0044118X18824738. doi:10.1177/0044118X18824738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Antero, Allan Luke, and Robyn Seglem. 2018. “Looking at the Next 20 Years of Multiliteracies: A Discussion with Allan Luke.” Theory Into Practice 57 (1): 72–78. doi:10.1080/00405841.2017.1390330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Antero, Nicole Mirra, Ernest Morrell, Antonio Martinez, and D’Artagnan Scorza. 2015. “The Council of Youth Research: Critical Literacy and Civic Agency in the Digital Age.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 31 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/10573569.2014.962203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Patricia, and Kimberly Scott. 2016. “Traversing a Political Pipeline: An Intersectional and Social Constructionist Approach Toward Technology Education for Girls of Color.” InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 12 (2). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/52f3z0wt.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, James. 1998. “What Is Literacy?” In Negotiating Academic Literacies: Teaching and Learning Across Languages and Cultures, edited by Vivian Zamel and Ruth Spack, 51–59. New York, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, James. 2000. “The New Literacy Studies: From ‘Socially Situated’ to the Work of the Social.” In Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, edited by David Barton, Mary Hamilton, and Roz Ivanič. New York, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, Benjamin. 2018. “Thinking in Hashtags: Exploring Teenagers’ New Literacies Practices on Twitter.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1462207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Delicia Tiera. 2016. “‘We Need More “US” in Schools!!’: Centering Black Adolescent Girls’ Literacy and Language Practices in Online School Spaces.” The Journal of Negro Education 85 (3): 274–289. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.85.3.0274.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, Kris D., P. Zitlali Morales, and Danny C. Martinez. 2009. “Re-Mediating Literacy: Culture, Difference, and Learning for Students From Nondominant Communities.” Review of Research in Education 33 (1): 212–245. doi:10.3102/0091732X08328267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, Heidi Lyn, Kevin J. Burke, and William Terrell Wright. 2019. “Opening Spaces of Restoration for Youth through Community-Engaged Critical Literacy Practices.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique, ahead-of-print. doi:10.1108/ETPC-05-2019-0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Ted. 2011. “Designing from Their Own Social Worlds: The Digital Story of Three African American Young Women.” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 10 (1): 7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-Perry, Melissa V. 2011. Sister Citizen: Shame, Stereotypes, and Black Women in America. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, Patricia. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Perspectives on Gender; v. 2. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Hinrichsen, Juliet, and Antony Coombs. 2014. “The Five Resources of Critical Digital Literacy: A Framework for Curriculum Integration.” Research in Learning Technology 21. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21.21334.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Dorothy, William Jr. Lachicotte, Debra Skinner, and Carole Cain. 2001. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Dorothy C., and Jean Lave. 2001. History in Person: Enduring Struggles, Contentious Practice, Intimate Identities. SAR Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/24181.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Mia. 2018. “‘We Flawless’: Black and Latina Adolescent Girls’ Readings of Femininity in Pop Culture.” Columbia University. doi:10.7916/D8ZK705G.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, Les, and Maria Novotny. 2018. “Teaching a Critical Digital Literacy of Wearables: A Feminist Surveillance as Care Pedagogy.” Computers and Composition, Wearable Technology, Ubiquitous Computing, and Immersive Experience: Implications for Writing Studies 50: 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2018.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Charlotte. 2017. “The Development of Black Girl Critical Literacies of Race, Gender, and Class in Independent Schools: Awareness, Agency, & Emotion.” Ph.D., United States – Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1933338530/abstract/13B2821E3EE4ADFPQ/1.
   Google Scholar
• James, Carrie, and Megan Cotnam-Kappel. 2019. “Doubtful Dialogue: How Youth Navigate the Draw (and Drawbacks) of Online Political Dialogue.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–22. doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janks, Hilary. 2000. “Domination, Access, Diversity and Design: A Synthesis for Critical Literacy Education.” Educational Review 52 (2): 175–186. doi:10.1080/713664035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, Rhonda, and Devair Jeffries. 2013. “Cultural Signification through Reader’s Theatre: An Analysis of African American Girls and Their Hair.” Multicultural Learning and Teaching 9 (2): 203–218. doi:10.1515/mlt-2012-0047.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, Robert T. 2000. “Literacy and the Identity Development of Latina/o Students.” American Educational Research Journal 37 (4): 971–1000. doi:10.3102/00028312037004971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, Lauren Leigh. 2018. “A Snapchat Story: How Black Girls Develop Strategies for Critical Resistance in School.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (4): 374–389. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1498352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, David E. 2010. “4 Colored Girls Who Considered Suicide/When Social Networking Was Enuf: A Black Feminist Perspective on Literacy Online.” In Adolescents’ Online Literacies: Connecting Classrooms, Digital Media, & Popular Culture, edited by Donna E. Alvermann, 71–89. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kynard, Carmen. 2010. “From Candy Girls to Cyber Sista-Cipher: Narrating Black Females’ Color-Consciousness and Counterstories in and out of School.” Harvard Educational Review 80 (1): 30–53. doi:10.17763/haer.80.1.4611255014427701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, Gloria. 2013. “‘Stakes Is High’: Educating New Century Students.” The Journal of Negro Education 82 (2): 105–110. doi:10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.2.0105.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, Wan Shun Eva. 2014. “Literacy and Capital in Immigrant Youths’ Online Networks across Countries.” Learning, Media and Technology 39 (4): 488–506. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.942665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leath, Seanna, Channing Mathews, Asya Harrison, and Tabbye Chavous. 2019. “Racial Identity, Racial Discrimination, and Classroom Engagement Outcomes Among Black Girls and Boys in Predominantly Black and Predominantly White School Districts.” American Educational Research Journal, January, 0002831218816955. doi:10.3102/0002831218816955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Clifford H., and Elisabeth Soep. 2016. “None But Ourselves Can Free Our Minds: Critical Computational Literacy as a Pedagogy of Resistance.” Equity & Excellence in Education 49 (4): 480–492. doi:10.1080/10665684.2016.1227157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, Amanda, Aaron Smith, Monica Anderson, Maeve Duggan, and Andrew Perrin. 2015. “Teens, Technology and Friendships.” Pew Research Center. http://apo.org.au/node/56457.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Tisha Y. 2013. “‘We Txt 2 Sty Cnnectd’: An African American Mother and Son Communicate: Digital Literacies, Meaning-Making, and Activity Theory Systems.” Journal of Education 193 (2): 1–13. doi:10.1177/002205741319300202.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, Treva B. 2018. “Ain’t Nobody Got Time for That: Anti-Black Girl Violence in the Era of #SayHerName.” Urban Education 53 (2): 162–175. doi:10.1177/0042085917747098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofland, J., and Lofland, L.H. 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, Joseph. 1992. “Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research.” Harvard Educational Review 62 (3): 279–301. doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, Sherell A., and Gholnecsar E. Muhammad. 2017. “Black Muslim Girls Navigating Multiple Oppositional Binaries Through Literacy and Letter Writing.” Educational Studies 53 (1): 63–77. doi:10.1080/00131946.2016.1263635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClaurin, Irma. 2001. Black Feminist Anthropology: Theory, Politics, Praxis, and Poetics. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, Julian, Mark Readman, and Philip Wilkinson. 2018. “The Uses of (Digital) Literacy.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (3): 263–279. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Kisha. 2019. “‘We Need a Seat at the Table’. Black Girls Using New Media to Construct Black Identity.” In The Black Girlhood Studies Collection, edited by Aria Halliday. Toronto: Women’s Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=BHjEDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA235&dq=black+girls+agency&ots=2m5mPtQzEI&sig=9QnKIYyjh4V8y7YLD18RyKoCKVc#v=onepage&q=black%20girls%20agency&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Mike. 2018. “Challenges of Confronting Dominant Language Ideologies in the High School English Classroom.” Research in the Teaching of English 52 (4): 455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, Elizabeth Birr. 2009. “Standpoints: A Call for New Research on New and Multi-Literacies.” Research in the Teaching of English 43 (4): 348–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, Bonnie, and Patrick R. Grzanka. 2017. “Using Intersectionality Responsibly: Toward Critical Epistemology, Structural Analysis, and Social Justice Activism.” Journal of Counseling Psychology, Intersectionality 64 (5): 500–513. doi:10.1037/cou0000203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, Ernest. 2015. Critical Literacy and Urban Youth: Pedagogies of Access, Dissent, and Liberation. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203937914.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Tami, and Juan Araujo. 2014. “Insights from a Literacy Tutor: A Case Study of Critical Reading and Writing Instruction With a Struggling Reader.” English in Texas 44 (2): 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, Gholnecsar E, and Marcelle Haddix. 2016. “Centering Black Girls’ Literacies: A Review of Literature on the Multiple Ways of Knowing of Black Girls.” English Education 38: 299–336.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, Gholnecsar E, and Erica Womack. 2015. “From Pen to Pin: The Multimodality of Black Girls (Re) Writing Their Lives.” The Journal of Literature, Literacy, and the Arts 2: 6–45.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Lisa. 2002. Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity, and Identity on the Internet. New York, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neal-Jackson, Alaina. 2018. “A Meta-Ethnographic Review of the Experiences of African American Girls and Young Women in K–12 Education.” Review of Educational Research, March, 0034654318760785. doi:10.3102/0034654318760785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2013. “Google Search: Hyper-Visibility as a Means of Rendering Black Women and Girls Invisible.” InVisible Culture; Rochester, no. 19 (Fall). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1771536966?pq-origsite=gscholar.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York, New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya, Jessica Zacher. 2018. Exploring Critical Digital Literacy Practices: Everyday Video in a Dual Language Context. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315102672.
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, Luciana. 2016. “Reconceptualising Critical Digital Literacy.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.942836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price-Dennis, Detra. 2016. “Developing Curriculum to Support Black Girls’ Literacies in Digital Spaces.” English Education; Urbana 48 (4): 337–361.
   Google Scholar
• Price-Dennis, Detra, Gholnecsar E Muhammad, Sherell A McArthur, and Marcelle Haddix. 2017. “The Multiple Identities and Literacies of Black Girlhood: A Conversation About Creating Spaces for Black Girl Voices.” Journal of Language and Literacy Education 13 (2): 18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridder, Sander De, and Frederik Dhaenens. 2019. “Coming Out as Popular Media Practice: The Politics of Queer Youth Coming Out on YouTube.” DiGeSt. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies 6 (2): 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, Victoria J., Kimberly A. Scott, and D. K. A. Clark. 2016. “The Digital Lives of African American Tweens, Teens, and Parents: Innovating and Learning with Technology.”.
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo, Jean J., Jane Margolis, Clifford H. Lee, Cueponcaxochitl D. M. Sandoval, and Joanna Goode. 2013. “Democratizing Computer Science Knowledge: Transforming the Face of Computer Science through Public High School Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 38 (2): 161–181. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.756514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Kimberly A., and Patricia Garcia. 2017. “Techno-Social Change Agents: Fostering Activist Dispositions Among Girls of Color.” Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 15 (1): 65–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solorzano, Daniel G., and Dolores Delgado Bernal. 2001. “Examining Transformational Resistance Through a Critical Race and Latcrit Theory Framework: Chicana and Chicano Students in an Urban Context.” Urban Education 36 (3): 308–342. doi:10.1177/0042085901363002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suggate, Sebastian, Elizabeth Schaughency, Helena McAnally, and Elaine Reese. 2018. “From Infancy to Adolescence: The Longitudinal Links between Vocabulary, Early Literacy Skills, Oral Narrative, and Reading Comprehension.” Cognitive Development 47: 82–95. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossoughi, Shirin, and Kris D. Gutiérrez. 2016. “Critical Pedagogy and Sociocultural Theory.” Power and Privilege in the Learning Sciences. doi:10.4324/9781315685762-14.
   Google Scholar
• Wargo, Jon M., and Kara Clayton. 2018. “From PSAs to Reel Communities: Exploring the Sounds and Silences of Urban Youth Mobilizing Digital Media Production.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (4): 469–484. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1534859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Rob, and Johanna Wyn. 1998. “Youth Agency and Social Context.” Journal of Sociology 34 (3): 314–327. doi:10.1177/144078339803400307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadrozny, Brandy. 2018. “Racist Trolls Sabotaged a NASA Competition to Stop Black Teen Girls from Winning.” NBC News, May 3, 2018. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/racist-trolls-hacked-nasa-competition-stop-black-teen-girls-winning-n871121.
   Google Scholar