Critical and participatory design in-between the tensions of daily schooling: working towards sustainable and reflective digital school development

References

• Akama, Yoko, Sarah Pink, and Annie Fergusson. 2015. “Design + Ethnography + Futures: Surrendering in Uncertainty.” In CHI 2015: Extended Abstracts Publication of the 33rd Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: April 18-23, 2015, Seoul, Republic of Korea, edited by Bo Begole, 531–542. Seoul: ACM. Accessed June 8, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Alirezabeigi, Samira, Jan Masschelein, and Mathias Decuypere. 2020. “Investigating Digital Doings Through Breakdowns: A Sociomaterial Ethnography of a Bring Your Own Device School.” Learning, Media and Technology 45 (2): 193–207. doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1727501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiel, Tel, and Thomas C. Reeves. 2008. “Design-Based Research and Educational Technology: Rethinking Technology and the Research Agenda.” Educational Technology & Society 11 (4): 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, Arthur. 2019. Design Research in Education: A Practical Guide for Early Career Researchers. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, Jeffrey, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. “What Is “Critical” About Critical Design?” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual SIGBHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3297–3306. New York, NY: ACM. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.11452470654.2466451.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, Susanne, Christian Dindler, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2017. “Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 26: 245–273. doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone, Lucas, Katja Brøgger, Mieke Berghmans, Mathias Decuypere, Annina Förschler, Emiliano Grimaldi, Sigrid Hartong, et al. 2021. “Pandemic Acceleration: Covid-19 and the Emergency Digitalization of European Education.” European Educational Research Journal 21 (5): 845–868. doi:10.1177/14749041211041793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumbo, Bronwyn, and Neil Selwyn. 2021. “Using Participatory Design Approaches in Educational Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 45 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2021.1902981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindler, Christian, Rachel Smith, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2020. “Computational Empowerment: Participatory Design in Education.” CoDesign 16 (1): 66–80. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1722173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö. 2006. “From Well-Bounded Ethnographies to Intervening in Mycorrhizae Activities.” Organization Studies 27 (12): 1783–1793. doi:10.1177/0170840606071898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, Sigrid. 2021. “Quality, Not Speed, Is What We Need - a Case for a Sustainable Transformation of Digital Education.” Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung e.V. Accessed June 10, 2022. https://www.boell.de/en/2021/04/15/a-case-for-a-sustainable-transformation-of-digital-education-in-Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hartong, Sigrid, Annina Förschler, and Vito Dabisch. 2021. “Data Infrastructures and the (Ambivalent) Effects of Rising Data Interoperability: Insights from Germany.” In Digital Disruption in Teaching and Testing: Assessments, Big Data, and the Transformation of Schooling, edited by Claire Wyatt-Smith, Bob Lingard, and Elizabeth Heck, 136–151. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iivari, Netta, and Kari Kuutti. 2017. “Critical Design Research and Information Technology.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, edited by Oli Mival, Michael Smyth, and Peter Dalsgaard, 983–993. New York, NY: ACM. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.11453064663.3064747.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, Anna, Emma Börjesson, Maja Gunn, Camilla Andersson, and Karin Ehrnberger. 2017. “Norm Critical Design and Ethnography: Possibilities, Objectives and Stakeholders.” Sociological Research Online 22 (4): 232–252. doi:10.1177/1360780417743168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandrić, Petar, and Jeremy Knox. 2021. “The Postdigital Turn: Philosophy, Education, Research.” Policy Futures in Education, 1–16. doi:10.1177/14782103211062713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandrić, Petar, Thomas Ryberg, Jeremy Knox, Nataša Lacković, Sarah Hayes, Juha Suoranta, Mark Smith, et al. 2019. “Postdigital Dialogue.” Postdigital Science and Education 1 (1): 163–189. doi:10.1007/s42438-018-0011-x.
   Google Scholar
• Karasti, Helena, and Jeanette Blomberg. 2018. “Studying Infrastructuring Ethnographically.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 27 (2): 233–265. doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9296-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerres, Michael. 2020. “Against All Odds: Education in Germany Coping with Covid-19.” Postdigital Science and Education 2 (3): 690–694. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00130-7.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, Jeremy. 2019. “What Does the ‘Postdigital’ Mean for Education? Three Critical Perspectives on the Digital, with Implications for Educational Research and Practice.” Postdigital Science and Education 1 (2): 357–370. doi:10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2010. “An Attempt at a "Compositionist Manifesto".” New Literary History 41 (3): 471–490. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40983881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2021. “Theories of Postdigital Heterogeneity: Implications for Research on Education and Datafication.” Postdigital Science and Education 3 (3): 660–667. doi:10.1007/s42438-021-00232-w.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah, Vaike Fors, Débora Lanzeni, Melisa Duque, Yolande Strengers, and Shanti Sumartojo. 2022. Design Ethnography: Research, Responsibility, and Futures. New York, NY: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003083665.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Justin. 2020. Failure to Disrupt: Why Technology Alone Can’t Transform Education. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Christoph, and Heidrun Allert. 2017. “Design as Critical Engagement in and for Education.” Educational Design Research 1 (1): 1–20. doi:10.15460/eder.1.1.1023.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Christoph, and Heidrun Allert. 2019. “Towards a Critical Design Agenda in Support of Collective Learning Ecologies.” In DELFI 2019, edited by N. Pinkwart, and J. Konert, 229–234. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. doi:10.18420/delfi2019_307.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A.. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action . New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, Jesper, and Toni Robertson. 2013. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spoden, Christian, and Josef Schrader. 2021. “Gestaltungsorientierte Forschung Zu Digitalen Lern- Und Bildungsmedien: Herausforderungen Und Handlungsempfehlungen.” DIE Resultate aus Forschung und Entwicklung. https://www.die-bonn.de/id/41432.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, Cristiano. 2014. “The Problem of De-Sign as Conjuring.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC '14, edited by Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Vincenzo D'Andrea, and Ole S. Iversen, 161–170. New York, NY: ACM Press. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Matt. 2019. “Critical About Critical and Speculative Design.” Accessed June 2, 2022. https://speculativeedu.eu/critical-about-critical-and-speculative-design/.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Ben, Felicitas Macgilchrist, and John Potter. 2021. “Covid-19 Controversies and Critical Research in Digital Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 46 (2): 117–127. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1922437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar