The construction of legitimacy: a critical discourse analysis of the rhetoric of educational technology in post-pandemic higher education

References

• Ball, S. J. 2013. Foucault, Power, and Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z., and D. Lyon. 2013. Liquid Surveillance: A Conversation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. 2016. Metric Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K. 2020. “Technoscience Rent: Toward a Theory of Rentiership for Technoscientific Capitalism.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (1): 3–33. doi:10.1177/0162243919829567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgmann, A. 1992. “The Moral Assessment of Technology.” In Democracy in a Technological Society, edited by L. Winner, 207–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Philosophy and Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, P. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Conole, G., J. Darby, M. de Laat, and T. Dillon. 2008. “‘Disruptive Technologies’, ‘Pedagogical Innovation’: What’s New? Findings from an in-Depth Study of Students’ use and Perception of Technology.” Development, Disruption and Debate 50 (2): 511–524. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. 1999. Technoromanticism: Digital Narrative, Holism, and the Romance of the Real. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., E. Grimaldi, and P. Landri. 2021. “Introduction: Critical Studies of Digital Education Platforms.” Critical Studies in Education 62 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dews, P.1999. Habermas: A Critical Reader. New Jersey: Wiley (Blackwell Critical Reader).
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J.1986. Karl Marx: A Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1993. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse – Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2009. “What is Philosophy of Technology?” In International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education, edited by M. J. de Vries and A. Jones, 159–166. Leiden: Brill Publishing (International Technology Education Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Flavin, M. 2012. “Disruptive Technologies in Higher Education.” Research in Learning Technology 20. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19184.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, W. J., and J. Vredevoogd. 2010. “The Future of Learning: 12 Views on Emerging Trends in Higher Education: On Behalf of our Campuses, we Need to Seek out Change; to be More Flexible, More Thoughtful, and More Open to Student Decision Making; and to Build Outcomes Measurement Feedback Into Integrated Planning.” Planning for Higher Education 38 (2): 5+.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1970. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 2011. “Technology, Inequality and Economic Growth.” Innovation and Development 1 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1080/2157930X.2010.551062.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., M. Breines, and M. Blaney. 2021. “Ontological Transparency, (In)visibility, and Hidden Curricula: Critical Pedagogy Amidst Contentious Edtech.” Postdigital Science and Education 3 (2): 425–443. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00198-1.
   Google Scholar
• Garnham, N. 2000. “‘Information Society’ As Theory or Ideology: A Critical Perspective in Technology, Education and Employment in the Information Age.” Information, Communication & Society 3 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1080/13691180050123677.
   Google Scholar
• Henwood, F., et al. 2002. Technology and In/Equality: Questioning the Information Society. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• HEPI. 2020a. Learning from Lockdown: Harnessing Tech to Improve the Student Experience. Accessed February 1, 2022. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2020/06/22/learning-from-lockdown-harnessing-tech-to-improve-the-student-experience/.
   Google Scholar
• HEPI. 2020b. The Future of Higher Education After COVID, HEPI. Accessed February 1, 2022. https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2020/10/16/the-future-of-higher-education-after-covid.
   Google Scholar
• HolonIQ. 2022. Global EdTech Venture Capital Report – Full Year 2021, HolonIQ. Accessed January 29, 2022. https://www.holoniq.com/notes/global-edtech-venture-capital-report-full-year-2021/.
   Google Scholar
• Jarke, J., and A. Breiter. 2019. “Editorial: The Datafication of Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1573833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarke, J., and F. Macgilchrist. 2021. “Dashboard Stories: How Narratives Told by Predictive Analytics Reconfigure Roles, Risk and Sociality in Education.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 20539517211025560. doi:10.1177/20539517211025561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jisc. 2020a. Digital at the Core: A 2030 Strategy Framework for University Leaders, Jisc. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/digital-strategy-framework-for-university-leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Jisc. 2020b. Learning and teaching Reimagined: A New Dawn for Higher Education? Jisc. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/learning-and-teaching-reimagined-a-new-dawn-for-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. 2019. “Capital, Neoliberalism and Educational Technology.” Postdigital Science and Education 1 (2): 288–292. doi:10.1007/s42438-019-00042-1.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M.J. et al. (2014) “The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, edited by J. M. Spector, et al., 101–111. New York, NY: Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Komljenovic, J. 2019. “Making Higher Education Markets: Trust-Building Strategies of Private Companies to Enter the Public Sector.” Higher Education 78 (1): 51–66. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0330-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komljenovic, J. 2021. “The Rise of Education Rentiers: Digital Platforms, Digital Data and Rents.” Learning, Media and Technology 46 (3): 320–332. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1891422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2006. Henri Lefebvre: Key Writings. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lovink, G. 2012. Networks Without a Cause: A Critique of Social Media. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. 2019. “Cruel Optimism in Edtech: When the Digital Data Practices of Educational Technology Providers Inadvertently Hinder Educational Equity.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 77–86. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. 2021. “What is ‘Critical’ in Critical Studies of Edtech? Three Responses.” Learning, Media and Technology 46 (3): 243–249. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1958843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglaras, V. 2013. “Consent and Submission: Aspects of Gramsci’s Theory of the Political and Civil Society.” SAGE Open 3 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1177/2158244012472347.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, K. 1991. Ideology and Utopia. 4th ed. London: Routledge (Collected Works). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=NxethJLLfGoC.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C. 2011. “Afterward.” In Cognitive Capitalism, Education and Digital Labour, edited by M. Peters and E. Bulut, 301–321. Berlin: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, T. 2017. “Higher Education, Unbundling, and the End of the University as We Know it.” Oxford Review of Education 46 (6): 733–748. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1343712.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, G. 2016. Universities, Disruptive Technologies, and Continuity in Higher Education: The Impact of Information Revolutions. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, D. E. 2007. Technology Matters: Questions to Live With. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office for Students (2021) Gravity Assist: Propelling Higher Education Towards a Brighter Future. London. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/gravity-assist-propelling-higher-education-towards-a-brighter-future/.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. 2006. Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., and C. Hardy. 2002. Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• QAA (2020) Building a Taxonomy for Digital Learning. London. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/guidance/building-a-taxonomy-for-digital-learning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• QAA. 2021. Quality Compass: Hybrid Futures: Hopes for Higher Education. London. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/news/quality-compass-hybrid-futures-hopes-for-higher-education.pdf?sfvrsn=3b69d681_6.
   Google Scholar
• Rafalow, M. H. 2020. Digital Divisions: How Schools Create Inequality in the Tech Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Robert Waters. 2021. EdTech: The Hyper-Accelerator. Accessed November 24 2021. https://www.robertwalters.co.uk/hiring/campaigns/edtech-report.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, T. 2013. “The Ideological Appropriation of Digital Technology in UK Education: Symbolic Violence and the Selling and Buying of the ‘Transformation Fallacy’.” In The Politics of Education and Technology: Conflicts, Controversies, and Connections, edited by N. Selwyn and K. Facer, 147–166. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2013. Distrusting Educational Technology: Critical Questions for Changing Times. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2016. Is Technology Good for Education? London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2019. Should Robots Replace Teachers? Cambridge: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2021. Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Swauger, S. 2020. Our Bodies Encoded: Algorithmic Test Proctoring in Higher Education, Hybrid Pedagogy. Accessed February 6, 2022. https://hybridpedagogy.org/our-bodies-encoded-algorithmic-test-proctoring-in-higher-education.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. 2004. “Researching Educational Policy and Change in ‘New Times’: Using Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Education Policy 19 (4): 433–451. doi:10.1080/0268093042000227483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titscher, S., and B. Jenner. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• UCISA. 2022. Building on Success: Strategic Plan 2022–2027. London. https://www.ucisa.ac.uk/-/media/Files/UCISA/Publication-files/UCISA-Strategic-Plan-2022-27-W.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Universities UK. 2021. Lessons from the Pandemic: Making the Most of Technologies in Teaching. London. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/what-we-do/policy-and-research/publications/lessons-pandemic-making-most.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J., T. Poell, and M. de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. 2008. Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2019. “Policy Networks, Performance Metrics and Platform Markets: Charting the Expanding Data Infrastructure of Higher Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (6): 2794–2809. doi:10.1111/bjet.12849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2020. “Bringing up the Bio-Datafied Child: Scientific and Ethical Controversies Over Computational Biology in Education.” Ethics and Education 15 (4): 444–463. doi:10.1080/17449642.2020.1822631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2021. “Psychodata: Disassembling the Psychological, Economic, and Statistical Infrastructure of ‘Social-Emotional Learning’.” Journal of Education Policy 36 (1): 129–154. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1672895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., S. Bayne, and S. Shay. 2020. “The Datafication of Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Issues and Perspectives.” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (4): 351–365. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., and A. Hogan. 2021. Post-Pandemic Reform of Higher Education: Market-First or Purpose-First Digital Transformation? Education International. Accessed October 23, 2021. https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/23685:post-pandemic-reform-of-higher-education-market-first-or-purpose-first-digital-transformation-by-ben-williamson-and-anna-hogan.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 2004. “Technology as Forms of Life.” In Readings in the Philosophy of Technology, edited by D. Kaplan, 103–114. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Witzenberger, K., and K. N. Gulson. 2021. “Why EdTech is Always Right: Students, Data and Machines in Pre-emptive Configurations.” Learning, Media and Technology 46 (4): 420–434. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1913181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., and M. Meyer. 2009. Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series).
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1996. “Invisible Ideology: Political Violence Between Fiction and Fantasy.” Journal of Political Ideologies 1 (1): 15–32. doi:10.1080/13569319608420726.
   Google Scholar