‘Because I’m always moving’: a mobile ethnography study of adolescent girls’ everyday print and digital reading practices

References

• Allen, K., and J. E. Ingulsrud. 2005. “Reading Manga: Patterns of Personal Literacies Among Adolescents.” Language and Education 19: 265–280. doi:10.1080/09500780508668681.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N., and A. Mangen. 2021. “Doing the Reading: The Decline of Long Long-Form Reading in Higher Education.” Poetics Today 42: 253–279. doi:10.1215/03335372-8883248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, L., and D. Holland. 2002. “Theorizing the Space of Literary Practices.” Ways of Knowing 2: 10–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, R., and C. Milligan. 2015. What is Diary Method? London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanič. 2000. Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorner, T., and M. Shchroder. 2019. “Advantages and Challenges of Using Mobile Ethnography in a Hospital Case Study: WhatsApp as a Method to Identify Perceptions and Practices.” Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 3, 28–67. https://www.pagepressjournals.org/index.php/qrmh/article/view/7795/8283.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. 2012. “Participating in the Always-on Lifestyle.” In The Social Media Reader, edited by Michael Mandiberg, 71–76. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresó-Grancha, N., M. J. Jorques-Infante, and C. Moret-Tatay. 2022. “Reading Digital- Versus Print-Easy Texts: A Study with University Students who Prefer Digital Sources.” Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 35 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/s41155-022-00212-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., R. Beaman, and K. Wheldall. 2014. “Why Poor Children Are More Likely to Become Poor Readers: The Early Years.” Educational Review 66 (4): 428–446. doi:10.1080/00131911.2013.79512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzitheochari, S., K. Fisher, E. Gilbert, L. Calderwood, T. Huskinson, A. Cleary, and J. Gershuny. 2018. “Using New Technologies for Time Diary Data Collection: Instrument Design and Data Quality Findings From a Mixed-Mode Pilot Survey.” Social Indicators Research 137: 379–390. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1569-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., and A. Teravainen-Goff. “Mental Wellbeing, Reading and Writing: How Children and Young People's Mental Wellbeing Is Related to Their Reading and Writing Experiences.” National Literacy Trust Research Report. Accessed 02 May 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Darvin, R. 2018. “Social Class and the Unequal Digital Literacies of Youth.” Language and Literacy 20: 26–45. doi:10.20360/langandlit29407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davie, S. 2019. “Streaming into Normal and Express in Secondary Schools to Stop in 2024; to be Replaced by Full Subject-Based Banding.” The Straits Times. Retrieved on May 3 from Streaming into Normal and Express in secondary schools to stop in 2024; to be replaced by full subject-based banding | The Straits Times.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., and D. R. Sedo. 2013. Reading Beyond the Book: The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, G. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gracia, P., J. Garcia-Roman, T. Oinas, and T. Anttila. 2020. “Child and Adolescent Time Use: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Marriage and Family 4, 1304–1325. doi:10.1111/jomf.12626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. 2019. “‘I Didn’t Enjoy Reading Until Now’: How Youths and Adults Engage with Interactive Digital Texts.” Research in the Teaching of English 54: 109–130. https://library.ncte.org/journals/rte/issues/v54-2/30617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 2002. Reading Lives: Working-Class Children and Literacy Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, R., and S. J. Samuels. 2017. The Achievement Gap in Reading: Complex Causes, Persistent Issues, Possible Solutions. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S., and Z. Mu. 2020. “Some Time Is Better Spent Than Other Time: Chinese Adolescents’ Time Use and Developmental Outcomes.” Child Indicators Research 13: 1739–1765. doi:10.1007/s12187-020-09718-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infocomm Media Development Authority. “Annual Survey on Infocomm Usage in Households and By Individuals for 2019.” https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/Imda/Files/Infocomm-Media-Landscape/Research-and-Statistics/Survey-Report/2019-HH-Public-Report_09032020.pdf (Accessed 02 May 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., S. Baumer, M. Bittani, D. Boyd, B. Herr-Stephenson, H. A. Horst, P. G. Lange, et al. 2010. Hanging out, Messing Around, and Geeking out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., K. D. Gutierrez, S. Livingstone, B. Penuel, J. E. Rhodes, K. Salen, J. Schor, J. Sefton-Green, and S. C. Watkins. 2013. Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. Irvin, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, W., and J. E. Song. 2017. “Webtoon as a New Korean Wave in the Process of Glocalization.” Kritika Kultura 29: 168–187. https://ajol.ateneo.edu/kk.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 1992. Textual Poachers. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jerasa, S., and T. Boffone. 2021. “BookTok 101: TikTok, Digital Literacies, and Out-of-School Reading Practices.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 65: 219–226. doi:10.1002/jaal.1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J., and G. Moss. 2019. “The Link Between Fiction and Teenagers’ Reading Skills: International Evidence from the OECD PISA Study.” British Educational Research Journal 45: 181–200. doi:10.1002/berj.3498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, C., and A. Muhonen. 2014. “Multilingual Repertoires and the Relocalization of Manga in Digital Media.” Discourse 4-5: 87–100. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2014.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S. R. 2012. Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St.Paul’s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., and K. K. McKim. 2003. “Tracing the Everyday ‘Sitings’ of Adolescents on the Internet: A Strategic Adaptation of Ethnography Across Online and Offline Spaces.” Education 3: 211–240. doi:10.1080/14636310303140.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M., N. C. Phillips, and K. H. Taylor. 2010. “The Changing Social Spaces of Learning: Mapping new Mobilities.” Review of Research in Education, 329–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, F. V., and W. Toh. 2020. “How to Teach Digital Reading?” Journal of Information Literacy 14 (2): 24–43. doi:10.11645/14.2.2701.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, C. E. 2013. “Singaporean Boys Constructing Global Literate Selves Through Their Reading Practices in and Out of School.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 44 (1): 38–57. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2012.01177.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. E., E. B. Hamarian, L. Y. Q. Lim, Q. Lim, and S. Y. Z. Ng. 2021. “A Case Study of Developing Future-Ready School Libraries through Design Thinking.” IFLA Journal 47 (4): 505–519.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, C. E., and B. Sun. 2019. “‘I'd Still Prefer to Read the Hard Copy’: Adolescents’ Print and Digital Reading Habits.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 62 (6): 663–672. doi:10.1002/jaal.904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. E., and B. Sun. 2020. “Cultural Capital, Habitus and Reading Futures: Middle-Class Adolescent Students’ Cultivation of Reading Dispositions in Singapore.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 41 (2): 234–252. doi:10.1080/01425692.2019.1690426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. E., and B. Sun. 2022. “The Impact of Technology Use on Adolescents’ Leisure Reading Preferences.” Literacy 56 (4)): 327–339. doi:10.1111/lit.12282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein-Barkai, H., and A. Lev-on. 2021. “News Videos Consumption in an Age of New Media: A Comparison Between Adolescents and Adults.” Journal of Children and Media 16: 1–17. doi:10.1080/17482798.2021.1915831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo, S., B. G. Jang, and M. McKenna. 2017. “The Relationship Between Reading Achievement and Attitudes Toward Print and Digital Texts in Adolescent Readers.” Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 66: 264–278. doi:10.1177/2381336917719254.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Chang, S., S. Kozak, and M. Rossi. 2020. “Time to Read Young Adult Fiction: Print Exposure and Linguistic Correlates in Adolescents.” Reading and Writing 33: 741–760. doi:10.1007/s11145-019-09987-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., K. Conradi, C. Lawrence, B. G. Jang, and J. P. Meyer. 2012. “Reading Attitudes of Middle School Students: Results of a U.S. Survey.” Reading Research Quarterly 47: 283–306. doi:10.1002/rrq.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meo, A. I. 2010. “Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 9: 149–171. doi:10.1177/160940691000900203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merga, M. K. 2014. “Are Teenagers Really Keen Digital Readers: Adolescent Engagement in Ebook Reading and the Relevance of Books Today.” English in Australia 49: 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2020. “Blended Learning to Enhance Schooling Experience and Further Develop Students Into Self-directed Learners.” https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/press-releases/20201229-blended-learning-to-enhance-schooling-experience-and-further-develop-students-into-self-directed-learners (Accessed 02 May 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., M. Overby, N. Tysvaer, and K. Morris. 2008. “The Complex World of Adolescent Literacy: Myths, Motivations, and Mysteries.” Harvard Educational Review 78: 107–154. doi:10.17763/haer.78.1.54468j6204x24157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muskat, M., B. Muskat, A. Zehrer, and R. Johns. 2013. “Generation Y: Evaluating Services Experiences Through Mobile Ethnography.” Tourism Review 68: 55–71. doi:10.1108/TR-02-2013-0007.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66: 60–93. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notten, N., and B. Becker. 2017. “Early Home Literacy and Adolescents’ Online Reading Behavior in Comparative Perspective.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 58: 475–493. doi:10.1177/0020715217735362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. “Country Note: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): Results From PISA 2018.” https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_SGP.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Paolisso, M., and R. Hames. 2010. “Time Diary Versus Instantaneous Sampling: A Comparison of Two Behavioral Research Methods.” Field Methods 22: 357–377. doi:10.1177/1525822X10379200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. A., and R. M. Kern. 1996. “Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.” American Sociological Review 61: 900–907. doi:10.2307/2096460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianzola, F., S. Rebora, and G. Lauer. 2020. “Wattpad as a Resource for Literary Studies. Quantitative and Qualitative Examples of the Importance of Digital Social Reading and Readers’ Comments in the Margins.” PLoS One 15: e0226708. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., and J. McDougall. 2017. Digital Media, Culture and Education: Theorising Third Space Literacies. London: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. 2013. The Widening Income Achievement Gap.” Educational Leadership 70 (8): 10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, D. 2006. “Compounding Inequalities: Gender and Class in Education.” In The Sage Handbook of Gender and Education, edited by C. Skelton, B. Francis, and L. Smulyan, 339–349. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roswell, J., E. Morrell, and D. E. Alvermann. 2017. “Confronting the Digital Divide: Debunking Brave New World Discourses.” The Reading Teacher 71: 157–165. doi:10.1002/trtr.1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzman, L. Y., L. D. Terzis, T. C. Hansel, J. M. Blakey, D. Logan, and P. S. Bordnick. 2021. “Harnessing Technology for Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Diary Study Protocol20.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20. doi:10.1177/1609406920986043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scolari, C. 2020. “What Are Teens Doing With Media? An Ethnographic Approach for Identifying Transmedia Skills and Informal Learning Strategies.” Digital Education Review, 269–287. doi:10.1344/der.2020.37.269-287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2009. “The Digital Native – Myth and Reality.” Aslib Proceedings 61: 364–379. doi:10.1108/00012530910973776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L., and P. A. Alexander. 2017. “Reading on Paper and Digitally: What the Past Decades of Empirical Research Reveal.” Review of Educational Research 87: 1007–1041. doi:10.3102/0034654317722961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, B. The #Bookstagram: Distributed Reading in the Social Media Age. Language Sciences 84 (2021): 101358. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebroff, D., and D. Kaufman. 2017. “Texting, Reading, and Other Daily Habits Associated with Adolescents’ Literacy Levels.” Education and Information Technologies, 2197–2216. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9544-3.
   Google Scholar