Another brick in the wall of ed-tech failures? A systematic literature review of the FATIH project in Turkey from the perspective of in-service teachers

References

• Ames, M. G. 2019. The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of one Laptop per Child. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• An, T., and M. Oliver. 2021. “What in the World is Educational Technology? Rethinking the Field from the Perspective of the Philosophy of Technology.” Learning, Media and Technology 46 (1): 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., and M. Oliver. 2011. “Talking Back to Theory: The Missed Opportunities in Learning Technology Research.” Research in Learning Technology 19 (3): 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567069.2011.624997.
   Google Scholar
• Brechner, M. 2019. “Plan Ceibal as Where Technology Accelerates Pedagogy.” In Handbook of Research on Engineering Education in a Global Context, edited by E. V. Smirnova and R. P. Clark, 22–34. Pennsylvania: IGI Global Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G., J. Smith, and S. White. 2006. “A Critique of the Impact of Policy and Funding.” In Contemporary Perspectives in e-Learning Research, edited by G. Conole and M. Oliver, 1st ed., 56–72. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966266.
   Google Scholar
• Cristia, J. 2013. “One Laptop Per Child in Peru: Findings and the Road Forward.” (Blog post). February 28. https://blogs.iadb.org/educacion/es/one-laptop-per-child-in-peru-findings-and-the-road-forward/.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. 2001. Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. 2013. “Why so Many Structural Changes in Schools and so Little Reform in Teaching Practice?” Journal of Educational Administration 51 (2): 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311304661.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, L. 1992. “Bilgisayar destekli eğitim projesi: Aşamalar, eleştiriler, öneriler” [Computer Aided Education Project: Stages, Criticisms, Suggestions]. Marmara University Ataturk Education Faculty Journal of Education Sciences 4: 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, R., R. Cockerill, and J. Barnsley. 2001. “Factors Affecting the Utilization of Systematic Reviews.” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 17 (2): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300105069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğan, D., M. Çınar, and S. S. Seferoğlu. 2016. “One Laptop per Child” Projects and FATIH Project: A Comparative Examination.” SDU International Journal of Educational Studies 3 (1): 1–26. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduijes/issue/20865/223878.
   Google Scholar
• Ekici, S., and B. Yılmaz. 2013. “FATİH Projesi üzerine bir değerlendirme” [An Evaluation of the FATIH Project]. Turkish Librarianship 27 (2): 317–339.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. 2005. “Teacher Pedagogical Beliefs: The Final Frontier in our Quest for Technology Integration?” Educational Technology Research and Development 53 (4): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, C. B., and M. Osborne. 2013. “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation?”
   Google Scholar
• Goundar, S. 2014. “The Distraction of Technology in the Classroom.” Journal of Education & Human Development 3 (1): 211–229.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, T., J. Hayes, L. Wilson, M. Gielniak, and R. Peterson. 2010. The Technology Factor: Nine Keys to Student Achievement and Cost-Effectiveness. Shelton, CT: MDR. https://www.k12blueprint.com/sites/default/files/Project-RED-Technolgy-Factor.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., S. Wineburg, and S. Woolworth. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Teacher Community.” Teacher College Record 103 (6): 942–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberler [News]. 2012. Eğitimde Fatih Projesinin başlama töreni [Commencement Ceremony of Fatih Project in Education] [Press Release]. February 06. https://www.haberler.com/yerel/egitimde-fatih-projesi-nin-baslama-toreni-3336193-haberi/.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., and T. Brush. 2007. “Integrating Technology Into K-12 Teaching and Learning: Current Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research.” Educational Technology Research and Development 55 (3): 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inan, F. A., and D. L. Lowther. 2010. “Factors Affecting Technology Integration in K-12 Classrooms: A Path Model.” Educational Technology Research and Development 58 (2): 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İslamoğlu, H., Ö. F. Ursavaş, and İ. Reisoğlu. 2015. “Fatih projesi üzerine yapılan akademik çalışmaların içerik analizi” [A Content Analysis of the Academic Work on the Fatih Project]. Educational Technology Theory and Practice 5 (1): 161–183. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.28463.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., S. Stoyanov, A. Ferrari, Y. Punie, K. Pannekeet, and P. Sloep. 2013. “Experts’ Views on Digital Competence: Commonalities and Differences.” Computers & Education 68: 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., and J. J. van Merriënboer. 2013. “Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education.” Educational Psychologist 48 (3): 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler, M., and P. Mishra. 2009. “What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 9 (1): 60–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, J. M., K. Thompson, and L. Corrin. 2022. “The Concerning Persistence of Weird Ideas about Learning and Educational Technology and their Influence on the Future Directions of Higher Education.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 38 (3): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, J. T. 1995. “Learning Technology and Groundhog Day.” In Hypermedia at Work: Practice and Theory in Higher Education, edited by W. Strang, V. B. Simpson, and J. Slater, 21–37. Canterbury: University of Kent Press.
   Google Scholar
• MoNE. 2022. “2022 yılı sonuna kadar dersliklerin yüzde 90'ı etkileşimli tahtayla buluşacak” [By the End of 2022, 90 percent of the Classrooms will Meet with Interactive Whiteboards]. January 3. https://www.meb.gov.tr/2022-yili-sonuna-kadar-dersliklerin-yuzde-90i-etkilesimli-tahtayla-bulusacak/haber/28388/tr.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R., and J. S. Bruner. 1996. “Folk Psychology and Folk Pedagogy.” In The Handbook of Education and Human Development: New Models of Learning, Teaching and Schooling, edited by D. R. Olson and N. T. Blackwell, 9–27. Oxford: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, S. 2010. “‘To Err is Human, but to Persist is Diabolical’: Loss of Organizational Memory and e-Learning Projects.” Computers & Education 55: 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, et al. 2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews.” Systematic Reviews 10 (89), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, S., and A. Melro. 2012. “Technological Policies for Education and Digital Literacy: The Governmental Program ‘e.Escolinha’.” Estudos em Comunicação 12: 293–324.
   Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M., and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Hampshire: Blackwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouezevara, S., A. Dinçer, S. Kipp, and Y. Sarıışık. 2013. Turkey’s Fatih Project: A Plan to Conquer the Digital Divide or a Technological Leap of Faith? RTI International and ERG, Istanbul. http://en.egitimreformugirisimi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Fatih.rapor_.ENG_.Myradan.son_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, S. K., and P. H. Bloch. 2011. “Linking Innovation to Design: Consumer Responses to Visual Product Newness.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 28 (1): 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00871.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, J. 2020. Failure to Disrupt: Why Technology Alone can’t Transform Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripani, M. F. 2020. Uruguay: Ceibal en Casa [Ceibal at home]. Education continuity stories series. OECD Press. http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/751561594144552848/pdf/Uruguay-Ceibal-en-Casa-Ceibal-at-Home.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarıoğlu, M., and M. Saraç. 2017. “Common and Branch-Specific Needs of Turkish Teachers About in-Service Training Courses Within the Scope of FATIH Project.” International Online Journal of Education and Teaching 4 (4): 520–539.
   Google Scholar
• Selçuk, Z. (@ziyaselcuk). 2011. “An Education System cannot Solve its Non-Technological Problems by Investing in Technology [Tweet].” Twitter, October 4. https://twitter.com/ziyaselcuk/status/121181139980402688
   Google Scholar
• Teräs, M., J. Suoranta, H. Teräs, and M. Curcher. 2020. “Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: A Seller’s Market.” Postdigital Science and Education 2 (3): 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Center for Educational Research (TCER). 2008. Evaluation of the Texas Technology Immersion Pilot: Outcomes for the Third Year (2006–07). Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research. https://tea.texas.gov/sites/default/files/TIP_Year_Three_ES.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tyack, D., and L. Cuban. 1997. Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO Bangkok. 2004. Integrating ICTs into Education: Lessons Learned. Vol. 1. Bangkok: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Uşun, S. 2004. Bilgisayar destekli öğretimin temelleri [Fundamentals of Computer Assisted Instruction]. Ankara: Nobel Press.
   Google Scholar