Risk disparities in the globalisation of assisted reproductive technology: The case of Asia

References

• Adamson, D. (2002). Regulation of ARTs in the U.S. Fertility and Sterility, 78(5), 932–942. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04199-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (1998). Current status of ART in Korea for 1994. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 41, 236–252. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=1856616
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (1999a). Current status of ART in Korea, 1996. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 42, 231–253. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=1857226
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (1999b). Current status of ART in Korea, 1995. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 42, 681–703. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=1856966
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (1999c). Current status of ART in Korea, 1997. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 42, 2151–2175. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=1857517
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2001). Current status of ART in Korea, 1998. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 44, 1883–1899. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=1860416
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2002). Current status of ART in Korea, 1999. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 45, 1700–1717. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=1978320
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2003). Current status of ART in Korea, 2000. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 46, 1888–1904. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2110736
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2004). Current status of ART in Korea, 2001. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 47, 2285–2302. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2391135
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2005). Current status of ART in Korea, 2002. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 48, 2777–2796. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2486706
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2006). Current status of ART in Korea, 2003. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 49, 2480–2497. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2582112
   Google Scholar
• ART Clinics Inspection Commission of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACIC-KSOG]. (2007). Current status of ART in Korea, 2004. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 50, 1615–1639. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2650994
   Google Scholar
• ART Committee of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [AC-KSOG]. (2008). Current status of ART in Korea, 2005. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 51, 1421–1447. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2739892
   Google Scholar
• ART Committee of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [AC-KSOG]. (2009). Current status of ART in Korea, 2006. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 52, 1212–1238. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2813486
   Google Scholar
• ART Committee of Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology [AC-KSOG]. (2010). Current status of ART in Korea, 2007. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [KSOG], 53, 1052–1077. Retrieved from http://kiss.kstudy.com/search/detail_page.asp?key=2882038
   Google Scholar
• Bae, J., Kim, G., Kim, B., Lim, B., Choi, Y., Lee, S., … Shin, S. (2007). Plan of increasing medical support for premature babies and unhealthy infants. Seoul: Management Center for Health Promotion.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1979). Public awareness and government regulation of research on IVF. In The Ethics Advisory Board of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (Eds.), HEW support of research involving human IVF and embryo transfer (ET). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1996). World risk society as cosmopolitan society? Theory, Culture & Society, 13(4): 1–32. doi:10.1177/0263276496013004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, T., Ericson, A., Hillensiö, T., Nygren, K. G., & Wennerholm, U. B. (1999). Deliveries and children born after IVF in Sweden 1982–95. Lancet, 354(9190), 1579–1585. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04345-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, R. E., Carr, B. R., Chang, R. J., DeCherney, A. H., Haney, A. F., Keye, W. R., … Seibel, M. M. (1987). Are we exploiting the infertile couple? Fertility and Sterility, 48, 735–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (1998). 1996 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (1999). 1997 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2000). 1998 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2001). 1999 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2002). 2000 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved October 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2003). 2001 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2004). 2002 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2005). 2003 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 4, 2006, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2007). 2005 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2008). 2006 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2009). 2007 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2010). 2008 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2011). 2009 ART success rates. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 26, 2012, from http://www.cdc.gov/art/ARTReports.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. L., Collins, J., Buckett, W., Racowsky, C., Hughes, E., & Jaryl, K., (2011). ART-related multiple births. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 33(2), 159–167. Retrieved from http://jogc.ca/abstracts/full/201102_HealthPolicy_1.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Craft, I., Brinsden, P. R., & Simons, E. G. (1987a). Licensing work on IVF and related procedures. Lancet, I(8546), 1373. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90673-8
   Google Scholar
• Craft, I., Brinsden, P., & Simons, E. (1987b). Multiple pregnancy and assisted reproduction. Lancet, II(8560), 692. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92486-X
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, C. J. & Wolf, D. P. (1997). Embryo number for transfer should be regulated. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 784–786. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00355-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mouzon, J. & Lancaster, P. (1997). World collaborative report on IVF preliminary data for 1995. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 14(5 Suppl.), 251S–265S.
   Google Scholar
• de Mouzon, J., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J. A., Ferraretti, A. P., Korsak, V., … The European IVF-Monitoring [EIM] Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [ESHIRE]. (2010). ART in Europe 2006. Human Reproduction, 25, 1851–1862. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mouzon, J., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Castilla, J. A., Ferraretti, A. P., Korsak, V., … The European IVF-Monitoring [EIM] Consortium, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [ESHIRE]. (2012). ART in Europe, 2007. Human Reproduction, 27, 954–966. doi:10.1093/humrep/des023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, R. P. (2007). The relative contribution of ARTs and ovulation induction to multiple births in the U.S. 5 years after the SART/ASRM recommendation to limit the NET. Fertility and Sterility, 88, 1554–1561. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. G. (1974). Fertilization of human eggs in vitro. Quarterly Review of Biology, 49, 3–26. doi:10.1086/407901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. G. (1983). The current clinical and ethical situation of human conception in vitro. In C. O. Carter (Ed.), Development in human reproduction and their eugenic, ethical implications (pp. 53–115). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R. G. & Sharpe, D. J. (1971). Social values and research in human embryology. Nature, 231(5298), 87–91. doi:10.1038/231087a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European IVF-Monitoring Programme, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [EIM-ESHRE]. (2001a). ART in Europe, 1997. Human Reproduction, 16, 384–391. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.2.384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The European IVF-Monitoring Programme, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [EIM-ESHRE]. (2001b). ART in Europe, 1998. Human Reproduction, 16, 2459–2471. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.11.2459
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The European IVF-Monitoring Programme, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [EIM-ESHRE]. (2002). ART in Europe, 1999. Human Reproduction, 17, 3260–3274. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The European IVF-Monitoring Programme, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [EIM-ESHRE]. (2004). ART in Europe, 2000. Human Reproduction, 19, 490–503. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European IVF-Monitoring Programme, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [EIM-ESHRE]. (2005). ART in Europe, 2001. Human Reproduction, 20, 1158–1176. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European IVF-Monitoring Programme, for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [EIM-ESHRE]. (2006). ART in Europe, 2002. Human Reproduction, 21, 1680–1697. doi:10.1093/humrep/del075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, J. L. H. (2002). Female subfertility. Lancet, 360(9327), 151–159. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09417-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gissler, M., Malin, M. S., & Hemminki, E. (1995). IVF pregnancies and perinatal health in Finland 1991–1993. Human Reproduction, 10, 1856–1861. Retrieved from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/7/1856.full.pdf+html
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazekamp, J., Bergh, C., Wennerholm, U. B., Hovatta, O., Karlström, P. O., & Selbing, A. (2000). Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART. Human Reproduction, 15, 1217–1219. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.6.1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, B. R. (1995). The impact of ART on the incidence of multiple gestation. In L. G. Keith, E. Papiernik, D. M. Keith, & B. Luke (Eds.), Multiple pregnancy (pp. 175–190). New York and London: The Parthenon Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [HFEA]. (1992). Annual report 1992. London: HFEA.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [HFEA]. (2003). Code of Practice ( sixth edition). London: HFEA.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [HFEA]. (2004). HFEA Annual Report 2003/04. London: HFEA.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [HFEA]. (2011). HFEA Annual Report 2010/11. London: HFEA.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, N.-M., Moon, S.-Y., Kim, T.-J., & Shim, E.-H. (2003). A study on utilization of health services and coping strategies for infertility in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C. (2009). Right to assisted reproductive technology: Overcoming infertility in low-resource countries. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 106(2), 172–174. doi:10.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Health Economics [IHE]. (2008). Determinants and prevention of low birth weight. Alerta, Canada: IHE.
   Google Scholar
• Interim Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryology [ILA]. (1990). The fifth report of the Interim Licensing Authority for Human IVF and Embryology. London: ILA.
   Google Scholar
• Interim Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryology [ILA]. (1991). The sixth report of the ILA for Human IVF and Embryology. London: ILA.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology [ICMART]. (2006). World collaborative report on IVF, 2000. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 1586–1622. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology [ICMART]. (2009). World collaborative report on ART, 2002. Human Reproduction, 24, 2310–2320. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Working Group for Registers on Assisted Reproduction also an IFFS Task Force [IWGROAR]. (2002). World collaborative report on ART, 1998. In D. L. Healy, G. T. Kovacs, R. McLachlan, & O. Rodriguez-Armas (Eds.), Reproductive medicine in the twenty-first century (pp. 209–219). Boca Raton: Parthenon Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G., Straughan, P. T., & Chan, A. (Eds.). (2009). Ultra-low fertility in Pacific Asia. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. W. (1982). The ethics of in vitro fertilization—1982. Fertility and Sterility, 37, 146–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H.W. & Schnorr, J. A. (2001). Multiple pregnancies. Fertility and Sterility, 75, 11–13. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01612-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungheim, E. S., Ryan, G. L., Levens, E. D., Cunningham, A. F., Macones, G. A., Carson, K. R., … Odem, R. R. (2010). Embryos transfer practices in the U.S. Fertility and Sterility, 94, 1432–1436. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra, S. K. & Barnhart, K. T. (2011). IVF and adverse childhood outcomes. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1887–1889. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlström, P. O. & Bergh, C. (2007). Reducing the NET in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Human Reproduction, 22, 2202–2207. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass, L. R. (1971). Babies by means of IVF. New England Journal of Medicine, 285(21), 1174–1179. doi:10.1056/NEJM197111182852105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato, K., Takehara, Y., Segawa, T., Kawachiya, S., Okuno, T., Kobayashi, T., … Kato, O. (2012). Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 10, 35–41. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-10-35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolata, G. (1983). IVF goes commercial. Science, 221(4616), 1160–1161. doi:10.1126/science.6612328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudstaal, J., Bruinse, H. W., Helmerhorst, F. M., Vermeiden, J. P., Willemsen, W. N., & Visser, G. H. (2000a). Obstetric outcome of twin pregnancies after IVF. Human Reproduction, 15, 935–940. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.4.935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koudstaal, J., Braat, D. D., Bruinse, H. W., Naaktgeboren, N., Vermeiden, J. P., & Visser, G. H. (2000b). Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF. Human Reproduction, 15, 1819–1825. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.8.1819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, W.-H. (2009). The voice on the bridge. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 3(1), 51–72. doi:10.1007/s12280-008-9066-1
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Lee, K., & Shin, M. (2009). Analysis of maternal child health services in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing, 15, 81–87. doi:10.4094/jkachn.2009.15.1.81
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, A., Griffiths, S., & Bhattacharya, S. (2011). Global variations in the uptake of SET. Human Reproduction Update, 17, 107–120. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, J. K., Breheny, S. A., MacLachlan, V., & Healy, D. L. (2004). What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated. Human Reproduction, 19, 3–7. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minakami, H., Sayama, M., Honma, Y., Matsubara, S., Kolke, T., Sato, I., & Araki, S. (1998). Lower risks of adverse outcome in twins conceived by artificial reproductive techniques compared with spontaneously conceived twins. Human Reproduction, 13, 2005–2008. doi:10.1093/humrep/13.7.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation [MRC Working Party]. (1990). Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978–87. British Medical Journal, 300(6734), 1229–1233. doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6734.1229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Gianaroli, L., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., & Nygren, K.G. (2007). ART in Europe, 2003. Human Reproduction, 22, 1513–1525. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Ferraretti, A.P., Bhattacharya, S., Felberbaum, R., de Mouzon, J., … The European IVF-Monitoring [EIM] Consortium for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [ESHIRE]. (2008). ART in Europe, 2004. Human Reproduction, 23, 756–771. doi:10.1093/humrep/den014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyboe Andersen, A., Goossens, V., Bhattacharya, S., Ferraretti, A.P., Kupka, M.S., de Mouzon, J., … The European IVF-Monitoring [EIM] Consortium for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology [ESHIRE]. (2009). ART and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005. Human Reproduction, 24, 1267–1287. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, K. (2002a). The Swedish experience of ARTs surveillance. In E. Vayena, P. J. Rowe, & P. D. Griffin (Eds.), Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction (pp. 351–354). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, K. (2002b). International registries of ARTs. In E. Vayena, P. J. Rowe, & P. D. Griffin (Eds.), Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction (pp. 377–380). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Nygren, K. G., Sullivan, E., Zegers-Hochschild, F., Mansour, R., Ishihara, O., Adamson, G.D., … de Mouzon, J. (2011). ICMART world report: ART 2003. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 2209–2222. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicators [online]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en [Accessed 2 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Olivennes, F., Fanchin, R., Lédée, N., Righini, C., Kadoch, I. J., & Frydman, R. (2002). Perinatal outcome and developmental studies on children born after IVF. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 117–128. doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet, W., De Sutter, P., Van der Elst, J., & Martens, G. (2005). Multiple gestation and infertility treatment. Human Reproduction Update, 11, 3–14. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A., & Chen, N. N. (2010). Asian biotech: Ethics and communities of fate. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine [PC of SART & ASRM]. (2004). Guidelines on the NET. Fertility and Sterility, 82, 773–774. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.031
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology [PC of ASRM & SART]. (2009). Guidelines on NET. Fertility and Sterility, 92, 1518–1519. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, P. (1972a). Shall we ‘reproduce’?: I. Journal of the American Medical Association, 220(10), 1346–1350. doi:10.1001/jama.1972.03200100058012
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, P. (1972b). Shall we ‘reproduce’?: II. Rejoinders and future forecast. Journal of the American Medical Association, 220(11), 1480–1485. doi:10.1001/jama.1972.03200110060012
   Google Scholar
• Rizk, B., Doyle, P., Tan, S. L., Rainsbury, P., Betts, J., Brinsden, P., … Edwards, R. (1991). Perinatal outcome and congenital malformations in IVF babies from the Bourn-Hallam group. Human Reproduction, 6, 1259–1264. Retrieved from http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/9/1259.full.pdf+html
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldeen, P., & Sundström, P. (2005). Would legislation imposing SET be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment? Human Reproduction, 20, 4–8. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve, L. A., Peterson, H. B., Maikle, S. F., Jeng, G., Danel, I., Burnett, N. M., … Wilcox, L. S. (1999). Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using IVF. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282(19), 1832–1838. doi:10.1001/jama.282.19.1832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve, L. A., Wilcox, L. S., Zeitz, J., Jeng, G., Hoffman, D., Brzyski, R., … Younger, B. (2002). Assessment of outcomes for ART. In E. Vayena, P. J. Rowe, & P. D. Griffin (Eds.), Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction (pp. 363–376). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Soules, M. M. (1985). The IVF pregnancy rate. Fertility and Sterility, 43, 511–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. (2012). Final results of birth statistics in 2011 [online]. http://kostat.go.kr [Accessed 2 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Steptoe, P. C. (1980). If only. In R. G. Edwards & P. C. Steptoe (Eds.), A matter of life: The story of medical breakthrough (pp. 67–72). London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Steptoe, P. C., & Edwards, R. G. (1983). Pregnancy in an infertile patient after transfer of an embryo fertilised in vitro. British Medical Journal, 286(6374), 1351. doi:10.1136/bmj.286.6374.1351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Balen, F., & Inhorn, M. C. (2002). Interpreting infertility: A view from the social sciences. In M. C. Inhorn & F. van Balen (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 3–32). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vayena, E., Peterson, H. B., Adamson, D., & Nygren, K. G. (2009). ARTs in developing countries. Fertility and Sterility, 92, 413–416. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voluntary Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryology [VLA]. (1985). Guidelines for both clinical and research application of human IVF. London: VLA.
   Google Scholar
• Voluntary Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilisation and Embryology [VLA]. (1986–1989). The report of the voluntary licensing authority for human IVF and embryology. London: VLA.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. (2005). Re-making the developmental state in Taiwan. International Political Science Review, 26, 169–191. doi:10.1177/0192512105050380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-L. (2012). IVF policy and global/local politics. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 725–732. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagida, K. (2009). Recent progress in IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection technologies in Japan. Japan Medical Association Journal, 52, 29–33. Retrieved from http://www.med.or.jp/english/journal/pdf/2009_01/029_033.pdf
   Google Scholar