From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’: Obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on abortion and its stigmatisation in Italy and Cataluña

References

• Bajos, N., & Ferrand, M. (2002). De la contraception à l'avortement. Sociologie des grossesses non prévues. Paris: Inserm.
   Google Scholar
• Bestard, J. (2005). Com fer visible l’interior del cos o diferents maneres d’imaginar el fetus. Quaderns de l’Intitut Català d’Antropologia, 21, 72–89. Retrieved from http://www.raco.cat/index.php/QuadernsICA/article/view/109911/169828
   Google Scholar
• Beynon-Jones, S. M. (2013). Expecting motherhood? Stratifying reproduction in 21st-century Scottish abortion practice. Sociology, 47(3), 509–525. doi: 10.1177/0038038512453797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casper, M. J., & Morgan, L. M. (2004). Constructing fetal citizens. Anthropology Newsletter, 45(9), 17–18. doi: 10.1111/an.2004.45.9.17
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, Committee of Social Rights. (2014). Decision on the merits of: International planned parenthood federation – European network (IPPF EN) v. Italy (Complaint No. 87/2012). Brussels: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, Committee of Social Rights. (2016). Decision on admissibility and the merits of: Confederazione Nazionale del Lavoro v. Italy (Complaint No. 91/2013). Brussels: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• De Zordo, S. (2016a). Lo stigma dell’aborto e l’obiezione di coscienza: l’esperienza e le opinioni dei ginecologi in Italia e in Catalogna (Spagna). Medicina nei Secoli (Sup.), 28(1), 195–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Zordo, S. (2016b). ‘Good doctors do not object’: Obstetricians-gynaecolosists’ perspectives on conscientious objection to abortion care and their engagement with pro-abortion rights protests in Italy. In S. De Zordo, J. Mishtal, & L. Anton (Eds.), A fragmented landscape. Abortion governance and protest logics in Europe (pp. 147–168). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Zordo, S., & Mishtal, J. (2011). Physicians and abortion: Provision, political participation and conflicts on the ground. The cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Health Issues, 21(Suppl. 35), S32–S36. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.01.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• España, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales y Igualdad. (2016). Interrupción voluntaria del embarazo. Datos definitivos correspondientes al año 2015. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales y Igualdad.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2010). Willing and unable. Doctors’ constraints in abortion care. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L., Landy, U., Darney, P., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Obstacles to the integration of abortion into obstetrics and gynecology practice. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(3), 146–151. doi: 10.1363/4214610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. H. (2008). Second trimester abortion provision: Breaking the silence and changing the discourse. Reproductive Health Matters, 16(Suppl. 31), 74–81. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31396-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L. H., Debbink, M., Martin, L., & Hassinger, J. (2011). Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: Findings from a pilot study of the providers share workshop. Social Science & Medicine, 73, 1062–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Italia, Ministero della Salute. (2016). Relazione del Ministero della Salute sull’attuazione della Legge contenente norme per la tutela della tutela sociale della maternità e per l’interruzione volontaria della gravidanza. Dati preliminari 2015. Dati definitivi 2014. Roma: Ministero della Salute.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, C. (2014). Commentary: Abortion provider stigma and mainstream medicine. Women Health, 54(7), 666–671. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2014.919985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S., Pyone, C., & Jennings, V. (2013). Current methods and attitudes of women towards contraception in Europe and America. Reproductive Health, 10(7), 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaufman, S. R., & Morgan, L. M. (2005). The anthropology of the beginnings and ends of life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 317–341. Retrieved from https://programaddssrr.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/the-anthropology-of-the-beginnings-and-ends-of-life.pdf doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Hessini, L., & Mitchell, E. M. H. (2009). Conceptualizing abortion stigma. Culture, Health and Society, 11(6), 625–639. doi: 10.1080/13691050902842741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, P. A. (2008). Surgical abortion in the second trimester. Reproductive Health Matters, 16(Suppl. 31), 151–162. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(08)31388-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, P. A., Hayes, J. L., & Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2008). Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 23(1), CD006714. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/rhl/reviews/CD006714sp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. A., Debbink, M., Hassinger, J., Youatt, E., & Harris, L. H. (2014). Abortion providers, stigma and professional quality of life. Contraception, 90(6), 581–587. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M. (1999). Materializing the fetal body, or, what are those corpses doing in biology’s basement? In L. M. Morgan & M. W. Michaels (Eds.), Fetal subjects, feminist positions (pp. 13–25). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M. (2009). Icons of life. A cultural history of human embryos. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. M., & Roberts, E. F. S. (2012/2014). Reproductive governance in Latin America. In S. De Zordo & M. Marchesi (Eds.), Reproduction and biopolitics: Ethnographies of governance, “irrationality” and resistance (pp. 105–118). London: Routledge. Reprint from (2012) Anthropology and Medicine, 19(2), 241–254.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, J., Weitz, T. A., & Freedman, L. R. (2011). Resistance and vulnerability to stigmatization in abortion work. Social Science & Medicine, 73, 1357–1364. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlamento Italiano. (1978). Legge 194-1978. Roma: Parlamento Italiano.
   Google Scholar
• Parlamento Italiano. (2004). Legge 40-2004. Roma: Parlamento Italiano.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. M., Debbink, M. P., & Steele, E. A. (2013). Why women are dying from unsafe abortion: Narratives of Ghanaian abortion providers. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 17(2), 118–128. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069757
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porqueres i Gené. (2015). Individu, personne et parenté en Europe. Paris: Ed. de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. (2000). Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seri, I., & Evans, J. (2008). Limits of viability: Definition of the gray zone. Journal of Perinatology, 28(Suppl. 1), S4–S8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK, Department of Health. (2016). Abortion statistics England and Wales: 2015. London: Abortion Statistics DH. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/433437/2014_Commentary__5_.pdf
   Google Scholar