CATHOLICISM AND EVERYDAY MORALITY: Filipino women’s narratives on reproductive health

References

• 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP). (2003, May 31). We must reject House Bill 4110. Pastoral Letter.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP). (2010, July 24). Securing our moral heritage: towards a moral society. Pastoral Letter.
   Google Scholar
• Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP). (2011, January 30). Choosing life, rejecting the RH Bill. Pastoral Letter.
   Google Scholar
• CBCP Monitor. (2008, May 12–25). Our responsibilities as Catholics. 12(10).
   Google Scholar
• Das, V. (2010). Engaging the life of the other: Love and everyday life. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action (pp. 376–399). New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El Dawla, A., Hadi, A., & Wahab, N. (1998). Women’s wit over men’s: Trade-offs and strategic accommodations in Egyptian women’s reproductive lives. In R. Petchesky, & K. Judd (Eds.), Negotiating reproductive rights: Women’s perspectives across countries and cultures (pp. 69–107). New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fabros, M., Paguntalan, A. M., Arches, L., & Padilla, G. (1998). From Sanas to Dapat: Negotiating entitlement in reproductive decision-making in the Philippines. In R. Petchesky, & K. Judd (Eds.), Negotiating reproductive rights: Women’s perspectives across countries and cultures (pp. 217–255). New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Groat, H. T., Neal, A. G., & Knisely, E. C. (1975). Contraceptive nonconformity among Catholics. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14(4), 367–377. doi: 10.2307/1384408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute and Likhaan Center. (2010). Facts on barriers to contraceptive use in the Philippines. InBrief, New York & Quezon City.
   Google Scholar
• Heinen, J., & Porter, S. (2010). Reproductive rights in Poland: When politicians fear the wrath of the church. Third World Quarterly, 31(6), 1007–1021. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2010.502735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrin, A. (2002). Population policy in the Philippines, 1969–2002. Philippine Institute for Development Studies Discussion Series. Makati, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. (2008). Catholics using contraceptives: Religion, family planning, and interpretive agency in rural Mexico. Studies in Family Planning, 39(2), 93–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00156.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House Bill No. 17 (Philippines). (2007). An act providing for a National Policy on reproductive health, responsible parenthood and population development, and for other purposes. Introduced by Rep. EdcelLagman. Fourteenth Congress. House of Representatives, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• House Bill No. 5043 (Philippines). (2008). An act providing for a National Policy on reproductive health, responsible parenthood and population development, and for other purposes. (Consolidated version of HB 17, HB 812, HB 2753, HB 3970). Sponsored by Reps. EdcelLagman, Arthur Pingoy, Reynaldo Uy, Janette Garin and Ana Theresia Hontiveros-Baraquel. Fourteenth Congress. House of Representatives, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, R., & Finer, L. B. (2013). Unintended pregnancy andunsafe abortion in the Philippines:context and consequences, In Brief, New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013, No. 3. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/IB-unintendedpregnancy-philippines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kawash, S. (2011). New directions in motherhood studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(4), 969–1003. doi: 10.1086/658637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Preidel, C., & Nebel, K. (2014). Brake rather than barrier: The impact of the Catholic Church on morality policies in Western Europe. West European Politics, 37(5), 845–866. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.909170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, W. (2003). Secret strategies: Women and abortion in Yoruba society, Nigeria. Amsterdam: Aksant.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, I. (2008). Matters of choice: Puerto Rican women’s struggle for reproductive freedom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maternowska, M. C. (2006). Reproducing inequities: Poverty and the politics of population in Haiti. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (2014). Moral laboratories: Family peril and the struggle for a good life. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal, J., & Dannefer, R. (2010). Reconciling religious identity and reproductive practices: The Church and contraception in Poland. European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 15(4), 232–242. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2010.498595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Statistics Office (NSO) [Philippines] and ORC Macro. (2013). National demographic and health survey, 2013. Calverton, MD: NSO and ORC Macro.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, A. O., Amuchastegui, A., & Rivas, M. (1998). ‘Because they were born from me:’ Negotiating women’s rights in Mexico. In R. Petchesky, & K. Judd (Eds.), Negotiating reproductive rights: Women’s perspectives across countries and cultures (pp. 145–179). New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Paxson, H. (2004). Making modern mothers: Ethics and family planning in Urban Greece. Berkeley, CA: University California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petchesky, R., & Judd, K. (1998). Introduction. In R. Petchesky, & K. Judd (Eds.), Negotiating reproductive rights: Women’s perspectives across countries and culture (pp. 1–30). London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). Global view on morality survey. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/04/15/global-morality/table/contraception-use/
   Google Scholar
• Philippine Star. (2017). TRO on contraceptives now lifted – DOH. Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/11/14/1759052/tro-contraceptives-now-lifted-doh#4DIy0BsFTDgR01tm.99
   Google Scholar
• Philippine Statistics Authority. (2011). Women in poor households are less likely to practice family planning (Results from the 2011 Family Health Survey). Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/content/women-poor-households-are-less-likely-practice-family-planning-results-2011-family-health
   Google Scholar
• Racelis, M. (2008). Where are women’s voices? Philippine Daily Inquirer.
   Google Scholar
• Raj, R., HengLeng, C., & Shuib, R. (1998). Between modernization and patriarchal revivalism: Reproductive negotiations among women in Peninsular Malaysia. In R. Petchesky, & K. Judd (Eds.), Negotiating reproductive rights: Women’s perspectives across countries and cultures (pp. 108–144). New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Republic Act No. 10354. (2012, December 21). An act providing for a national policy on responsible parenthood and reproductive health. Congress of the Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard, D. A. (2010). Primacy of conscience: a pastoral theological construction of agency for catholic moral decision-making (Dissertation). University of Denver and the Iliff School of Theology Joint PhD Program.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Austria, K. (2004). The church, the state and women’s bodies in the context of religious fundamentalism in the Philippines. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24), 96–103. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24152-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, B. (2000). The “double discourse” on sexual and reproductive rights in Latin America: The chasm between public policy and private actions. Health and Human Rights, 4(2), 110–143. doi: 10.2307/4065198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class & gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Social Weather Stations. (2011). Second Quarter 2011 Social Weather Survey: 82% say family planning method is a personal choice; 73% want information on legal methods available from government. SWS website.
   Google Scholar
• Westoff, C. F., & Jones, E. F. (1977). The secularization of U.S. Catholic birth control practices. Family Planning Perspectives, 9(5), 203–207. doi: 10.2307/2134429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2004). Abortion, sin and the state in Thailand. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon.
   Google Scholar
• Zigon, J. (2008). Morality: An anthropological perspective. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar