References
- Adalja, A., Sell, T. K., McGinty, M., & Boddie, C. (2016). Genetically modified (GM) mosquito use to reduce mosquito-transmitted disease in the US: A community opinion survey. PLOS Currents Outbreaks. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.1c39ec05a743d41ee39391ed0f2ed8d3
- Alphey, L., McKemey, A., Nimmo, D., Neira Oviedo, M., Lacroix, R., Matzen, K., & Beech, C. (2013). Genetic control of Aedes mosquitoes. Pathogens and Global Health, 107(4), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047773213Y.0000000095
- Barnett, J., Cooper, H., & Senior, V. (2007). Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x
- Bloss, C. S., Stoler, J., Brouwer, K. C., Bietz, M., & Cheung, C. (2017). Public response to a proposed field trial of genetically engineered mosquitoes in the United States. JAMA, 318(7), 662–664. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.9285
- Bohannon, J. (2015). ‘Chain reaction’ spreads gene through insects. Retrieved March 28, from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/chain-reaction-spreads-gene-through-insects
- Brossard, D., Belluck, P., Gould, F., & Wirz, C. D. (2019). Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201805874. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805874115
- Burt, A. (2003). Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1518), 921–928. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2319
- California Senate Office of Research. (2017). A Statistical Picture of Latinos in California: 2017 Update. Retrieved February 21, from https://latinocaucus.legislature.ca.gov/sites/latinocaucus.legislature.ca.gov/files/forms/Statistical%20Picture%20of%20Latinos%20in%20California%20-%202017%20Update.pdf
- Chaet, A. V., Morshedi, B., Wells, K. J., Barnes, L. E., & Valdez, R. (2016). Spanish-language consumer health information technology interventions: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(8), e214–e214. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5794
- Collins, J. P. (2018). Gene drives in our future: Challenges of and opportunities for using a self-sustaining technology in pest and vector management. BMC Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0110-4
- Connor, M., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Factors influencing people's acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust. Science Communication, 32(4), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547009358919
- Convention on biological diversity: Fact sheets and banners. Retrieved June 21, from http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/cpb_factsheets.shtml
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). (2017). Building the Safe Genes Toolkit. Retrieved March 25, from https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2017-07-19
- Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021
- Esvelt, K. M., & Gemmell, N. J. (2017). Conservation demands safe gene drive. PLoS Biology, 15(11), e2003850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003850
- Esvelt, K. M., Smidler, A. L., Catteruccia, F., & Church, G. M. (2014). Emerging technology: Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. Elife, 3, e03401. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03401
- Gantz, V. M., & Bier, E. (2015). The mutagenic chain reaction: A method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science, 348(6233), 442–444. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5945
- GFK KnowledgePanel. Be Sure with KnowledgePanel. Retrieved May 8, from https://www.gfk.com/fileadmin/user_upload/dyna_content/US/documents/GfK_Fact_Sheet_-_Knowledge_Panel_-_Overview.pdf
- Gonzalez-Barrera, A., & Lopez, M. H. (2013). Spanish is the most spoken non-English language in U.S. homes, even among non-Hispanics. Retrieved April 4, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/08/13/spanish-is-the-most-spoken-non-english-language-in-u-s-homes-even-among-non-hispanics/
- Hendzel, K. (2012). Translation is not about words. It’s about what the words are about. http://www.kevinhendzel.com/translation-is-not-about-words-its-about-what-the-words-are-about/
- Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001
- Joint Working Group for California’s Language Access Plan. (2015). Strategic plan for language access in the California courts. http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/CLASP_report_060514.pdf
- Kandul, N. P., Liu, J., Sanchez C, H. M., Wu, S. L., Marshall, J. M., & Akbari, O. S. (2019). Transforming insect population control with precision guided sterile males with demonstration in flies. Nature Communications, 10(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07964-7
- Magaña, D., & Matlock, T. (2018). How Spanish speakers use metaphor to describe their experiences with cancer. Discourse & Communication, 12(6), 627–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771446
- McDermott, M. A. N., & Palchanes, K. (1994). A literature review of the critical elements in translation theory. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00928.x
- McGee, J., & McGee & Evers Consulting. Toolkit for Making Written Material Clear and Effective. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Retrieved March 6, from https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Outreach/WrittenMaterialsToolkit
- Montgomery, S. L. (2013). Does science need a global language?: English and the future of research. University of Chicago Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Gene drives on the horizon: Advancing science, navigating uncertainty, and aligning research with public values. National Academies Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. National Academies Press.
- National Science Board. (2018). Chapter 7: Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-technology-public-attitudes-and-understanding/public-knowledge-about-s-t
- Noble, C., Olejarz, J., Esvelt, K. M., Church, G. M., & Nowak, M. A. (2017). Evolutionary dynamics of CRISPR gene drives. Science Advances, 3(4), e1601964. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601964
- Oye, K. A., Esvelt, K., Appleton, E., Catteruccia, F., Church, G., Kuiken, T., Lightfoot, S. B.-Y., McNamara, J., Smidler, A., & Collins, J. P. (2014). Regulating gene drives. Science, 345(6197), 626–628. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254287
- Pew Research Center. (2015). A look at what the public knows and does not know about science. Retrieved April 4, from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/09/10/what-the-public-knows-and-does-not-know-about-science/
- Pew Research Center. (2016). Public opinion about genetically modified foods and trust in scientists connected with these foods. Retrieved March 1, from http://www.pewresearch.org/science/2016/12/01/public-opinion-about-genetically-modified-foods-and-trust-in-scientists-connected-with-these-foods/
- Piqué-Noguera, C. (2013). English-written abstracts for Spanish publications: A challenge in the globalization of science. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos. (Vol. 19).
- Resnik, D. B. (2014). Ethical issues in field trials of genetically modified disease-resistant mosquitoes. Developing World Bioethics, 14(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12011
- Santos Jr, H. P., Black, A. M., & Sandelowski, M. (2015). Timing of translation in cross-language qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 25(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314549603
- Schairer, C. E., Taitingfong, R., Akbari, O. S., & Bloss, C. S. (2019). A typology of community and stakeholder engagement based on documented examples in the field of novel vector control. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(11), e0007863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007863
- Seiler, T.-B., Engwall, M., & Hollert, H. (2013). Lost in translation? Ways for environmental sciences to communicate about risk and research. Environmental Sciences Europe, 25(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-25-8
- Squires, A. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.08.006
- Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
- Unckless, R. L., Messer, P. W., Connallon, T., & Clark, A. G. (2015). Modeling the manipulation of natural populations by the mutagenic chain reaction. Genetics, 201(2), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.177592
- United States Census Bureau. American fact finder. Retrieved February 22, from https://factfinder.census.gov/
- United States Census Bureau. (2015). Census Bureau Reports at least 350 languages spoken in U.S. Homes.
- Wikipedia. Genética dirigida. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gen%C3%A9tica_dirigida
- Yeo, S. K., & Brossard, D. (2017). The (changing) nature of scientist–media interactions: A cross-national analysis. Oxford University Press.