Abortion rights beyond the medico-legal paradigm

References

• Assis, M. P., & Erdman, J. N. (2021). In the name of public health: Misoprostol and the new criminalization of abortion in Brazil. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab009.
   Google Scholar
• Assis, M. P., & Larrea, S. (2020). Why self-managed abortion is so much more than a provisional solution for times of pandemic. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 28(1), 1779633. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1779633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assis, M. P., & Larrea, S. (2022). Exposing abortion-related obstetric violence through activism in Latin America and the Caribbean. In A. N. Castañeda, N. Hill, & J. J. Searcy (Eds.), Obstetric violence. Demeter Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berer, M. (2004). National laws and unsafe abortion: The parameters of change. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24 SUPPL.), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24024-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berer, M. (2017). Abortion law and policy around the world: In search of decriminalization. Health and Human Rights, 19(1), 13–27. /pmc/articles/PMC5473035/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berro Pizzarossa, L., & Nandagiri, R. (2021). Self-managed abortion: A constellation of actors, a cacophony of laws? Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(1), 1899764. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1899764
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calkin, S. (2019). Towards a political geography of abortion. Political Geography, 69, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, Y.-S., Su, L.-L., & Arulkumaran, S. (2004). Misoprostol: A quarter century of use, abuse, and creative misuse. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 59(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000109168.83489.66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, S. H. (1998). Commercial availability of misoprostol and induced abortion in Brazil. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 63(SUPPL. 1), S131–S139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00195-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Tello, F., Mikesell, M., & Adams, J. E. (2017, November 28). Roe’s unfinished promise: Decriminalizing abortion once and for all. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3082643
   Google Scholar
• Drovetta, R. I. (2015). Safe abortion information hotlines: An effective strategy for increasing women’s access to safe abortions in Latin America. Reproductive Health Matters, 23(45), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzuba, I. G., Winikoff, B., & Peña, M. (2013). Medical abortion: A path to safe, high-quality abortion care in Latin America and the Caribbean. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 18(6), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.824564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, S. (2018). The doctrinal approach in international human rights law scholarship. In Lee McConnell & Rhona Smith (Eds.), Research methods in human rights (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315672632-3
   Google Scholar
• Erdman, J. N. (2011). Access to information on safe abortion: A harm reduction and human rights approach. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 34(2), 413–462. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hwlj34&id=417&div=&collection=.
   Google Scholar
• Erdman, J. N., & Cook, R. J. (2020). Decriminalization of abortion – A human rights imperative. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 62, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdman, J. N., Jelinska, K., & Yanow, S. (2018). Understandings of self-managed abortion as health inequity, harm reduction and social change. Reproductive Health matters, 26(54), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1511769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewart, W. R., & Winikoff, B. (1998). Toward safe and effective medical abortion. Science, 281(5376), 520–521. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5376.520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26(25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Frye, L. J., Kilfedder, C., Blum, J., & Winikoff, B. (2020). A cross-sectional analysis of mifepristone, misoprostol, and combination mifepristone-misoprostol package inserts obtained in 20 countries. Contraception, 101(5), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganatra, B., Tunçalp, Ö, Johnston, H. B., Johnson, B. R., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Temmerman, M. (2014). From concept to measurement: Operationalizing WHO’s definition of unsafe abortion. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(3), 155. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.136333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdts, C., & Hudaya, I. (2016). Quality of care in a safe-abortion hotline in Indonesia: Beyond harm reduction. American journal of public health, 106(11), 2071–2075. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdts, C., Jayaweera, R. T., Kristianingrum, I. A., Khan, Z., & Hudaya, I. (2020). Effect of a smartphone intervention on self-managed medication abortion experiences among safe-abortion hotline clients in Indonesia: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 149(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, L. (2005). WHO puts abortifacients on its essential drug list. BMJ, 331(7508), 68.4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7508.68-c
   Google Scholar
• Irons, R. (2020). Post-coital pharmaceuticals and abortion ambiguity: Avoiding unwanted pregnancy using emergency contraception and misoprostol in Lima, Peru. In J. Gamlin, S. Gibbon, P. M. Sesia, & L. Berrío (Eds.), Critical medical anthropology: Perspectives in and from Latin America (pp. 90–115). University College London. https://books.google.ca/books?id=2sXgDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90&dq=Post-coital+pharmaceuticals+and+abortion+ambiguity:+Avoiding+unwanted+pregnancy+using+emergency+contraception+and+misoprostol+in+Lima,+Peru&source=bl&ots=N98YNvQls6&sig=ACfU3U3aOO8UHmEQ9shn
   Google Scholar
• Jelinska, K., & Yanow, S. (2018). Putting abortion pills into women’s hands: Realizing the full potential of medical abortion. Contraception, 97(2), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechlem, K. (2009, November 17). Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human rights. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 905–947. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1507877
   Google Scholar
• Nations, M. K., Misago, C., Fonseca, W., Correia, L. L., & Campbell, O. M. R. (1997). Women’s hidden transcripts about abortion in Brazil. Social Science and Medicine, 44(12), 1833–1845. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00293-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perehudoff, K., Berro Pizzarossa, L., & Stekelenburg, J. (2018). Realising the right to sexual and reproductive health: Access to essential medicines for medical abortion as a core obligation. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-018-0140-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramos, S., Romero, M., & Aizenberg, L. (2014). Women’s experiences with the use of medical abortion in a legally restricted context: The case of Argentina. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44 (Suppl 1)), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43786-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santarelli, N., & Anzorena, C. (2017). Los socorrismos y las disputas de sentidos sobre el aborto voluntario. Consideraciones teóricas desde una perspectiva del feminismo crítico. Descentrada, 1(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, G., Iyer, A., & Mukherjee, C. (2009). A methodology to analyse the intersections of Social inequalities in health. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452820903048894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for human rights: International Law in Domestic politics. Cambridge University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Mobilizing-Human-Rights-International-Domestic/dp/0521712327.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, E. O. (2019). Realizing abortion rights at the margins of legality in Mexico. Medical Anthropology: Cross Cultural Studies in Health and Illness, 38(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1474213
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (2006). Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: Estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet, 368(9550), 1887–1892. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69778-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C., & Chiarotti, S. (2004). With everything exposed: Cruelty in post-abortion care in Rosario, Argentina. Reproductive Health Matters, 12(24 SUPPL.), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24021-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, B., & Vacarezza, N. L. (2020). Abortion rights in images: Visual interventions by activist organizations in Argentina. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 45(3), 731–757. https://doi.org/10.1086/706489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, C. (2017). Human rights and the empire of (international) Law. Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, 29(2), 313–341. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol29/iss2/2.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights. (2016). General Comment No. 22 (E/C.12/GC/22). https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2FC.12%2FGC%2F22&Lang=en
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights. (2020). General Comment No. 25 on science and economic, social and cultural rights (E/C.12/GC/25). https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/E/C.12/GC/25.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (1999). General recommendation No. 24: Article 12 of the Convention (women and health). https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared Documents/1_Global/INT_CEDAW_GEC_4738_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (2013). General Recommendation No. 30 on women in conflict prevention, conflict and post-conflict situations (CEDAW/C/GC/30). https://undocs.org/CEDAW/C/GC/30.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (2016). General Recommendation No. 34 on the rights of rural women (CEDAW/C/GC/34). https://undocs.org/CEDAW/C/GC/34.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (2017). General Recommendation No. 35 (CEDAW/C/GC/35). https://www.undocs.org/CEDAW/C/GC/35.
   Google Scholar
• UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (2018). General Recommendation No. 37 on the gender-related dimensions of disaster risk reduction in the context of climate change (CEDAW/C/GC/37). https://undocs.org/CEDAW/C/GC/37.
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Committee. (2000). General Comment No. 28 (HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I)). https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CCPR/Shared Documents/1_Global/CCPR_C_21_Rev-1_Add-10_6619_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Committee. (2016). General Comment No. 36 (CCPR/C/GC/36).
   Google Scholar
• UN Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order. (2013). Report (A/HRC/24/38). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/IntOrder/A-HRC-24-38_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights. (2017). Cultural Rights (A/72/155). https://undocs.org/A/72/155.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial summary or arbitrary executions. (2017). Report (A/HRC/35/23). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/35/23.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial summary or arbitrary executions. (2018). Saving Lives is not a Crime (A/73/314). https://undocs.org/A/73/314.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. (2011). Extreme poverty and human rights (A/66/265). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/444/49/PDF/N1144449.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief. (2020). Gender-based violence and discrimination in the name of religion or belief (A/HRC/43/48). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/43/48.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants. (2010). Report (A/HRC/14/30). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G10/126/15/PDF/G1012615.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. (2004). Report (E/CN.4/2004/49). https://undocs.org/E/CN.4/2004/49.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. (2006). Report (E/CN.4/2006/48). https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/114/69/PDF/G0611469.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. (2011). Report (A/66/254). https://undocs.org/A/66/254.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. (2013). Report on access to medicines (A/HRC/23/42). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/23/42.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. (2016). Report (A/HRC/32/32). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/32/32.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. (2018). Report (A/HRC/38/36). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/38/36.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy. (2020). Report (A/HRC/43/52). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/43/52.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities. (2019). Report (A/HRC/43/41). https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/43/41.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders. (2019a). Situation of human rights defenders (A/74/159). https://undocs.org/A/74/159.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders. (2019b). Situation of women human rights defenders (A/HRC/40/60). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/40/60.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. (2016). Report (A/HRC/31/57). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/31/57.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences. (2001). Review of Reports, Studies and other Documentation for the Preparatory Committee and the World Conference (A/CONF.189/PC.3/5). https://undocs.org/A/CONF.189/PC.3/5.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences. (2013). Pathways to, conditions and consequences of incarceration for women (A/68/340). https://undocs.org/A/68/340.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences. (2019). A human rights-based approach to mistreatment and violence against women in reproductive health services with a focus on childbirth and obstetric violence (A/74/137). https://undocs.org/en/A/74/137.
   Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences. (2020). Violence against women, its causes and consequences (A/75/144). https://undocs.org/A/75/144.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice. (2016). Report (A/HRC/32/44). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/32/44.
   Google Scholar
• UN Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice. (2019). Women deprived of liberty (A/HRC/41/33). https://undocs.org/en/A/HRC/41/33.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, A. (2020). Feminist networks facilitating access to misoprostol in Mesoamerica. Feminist Review, 124(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919888070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz, T. A., Foster, A., Ellertson, C., Grossman, D., & Stewart, F. H. (2004). “Medical” and “surgical” abortion: Rethinking the modifiers. Contraception, 69(1), 77–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2003.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines. (2003). WHO Technical Report Series 920: The selection and use of essential medicines. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42826/WHO_TRS_920.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines. (2005). WHO Technical Report Series 933: The selection and use of essential medicines. https://archives.who.int/medicines/services/expertcommittees/essentialmedicines/TRS933SelectionUseEM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Women Help Women. (2020). Obstetric Violence and Abortion: Ideas on self-defense for people having abortions. https://womenhelp.org/en/media/inline/2020/6/3/obstetric_violence_en_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (1993). The Prevention and management of unsafe abortion: Report of a technical working group. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/59705.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2012). Safe Abortion: Technical and POlicy Guidance for Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2015). Health worker roles in providing safe abortion care and post-abortion contraception (p. 81).
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Medical management of abortion (p. 54).
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, S., Erdman, J., & Jelinska, K. (2019). D.I.Y. Self-managed Abortion. Conscience Magazine, 2. https://consciencemag.org/2019/09/19/d-i-y/
   Google Scholar
• Zamberlin, N., Romero, M., & Ramos, S. (2012). Latin American women’s experiences with medical abortion in settings where abortion is legally restricted. Reproductive health, 9(34), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zurbriggen, R., Keefe-Oates, B., & Gerdts, C. (2018). Accompaniment of second-trimester abortions: The model of the feminist Socorrista network of Argentina. Contraception, 97(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar