Is gender inequality a barrier to realizing fertility intentions? Fertility aspirations and realizations in South Korea

References

• Anderson, T., & Kohler, H. (2013). Education fever and the East Asian fertility puzzle: A case study of low fertility in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 9, 196–215. doi:10.1080/17441730.2013.797293
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, 29(1), 1–38. doi:10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y
   Google Scholar
• Balbo, N., & Mills, M. (2011). The influence of the family network on the realization of fertility intentions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 179–206. doi:10.1553/populationyearbook2011s179
   Google Scholar
• Bulatao, R. A. (1981). Values and disvalues of children in successive childbearing decisions. Demography, 18(1), 1–25. doi:10.2307/2061046
   Google Scholar
• Bumpass, L. L., Rindfuss, R. R., Choe, M. K., & Tsuya, N. O. (2009). The institutional context of low fertility: The case of Japan. Asian Population Studies, 5, 215–235. doi:10.1080/17441730903351479
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, L. P. (2009). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 123–140. doi:10.1017/S0047279408002584
   Google Scholar
• Eun, K. S. (2007). Lowest-low fertility in the Republic of Korea: Causes, consequences, and policy responses. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 22, 51–72. Retrieved from http://www.popline.org/node/200336
   Google Scholar
• Folbre, N. (1983). Of patriarchy born: The political economy of fertility decisions. Feminist Studies, 9, 261–284. doi:10.2307/3177490
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Branden, M. (2013). Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29, 1097–1126. Retrieved from http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol29/40/29-40.pdf doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.40
   Google Scholar
• Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behaviour. Population and Development Review, 41, 207–239. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x
   Google Scholar
• Government of Korea. (2006). Saeromaji plan 2010. The first mater plan for overcoming low fertility and ageing society. Various ministries. Seoul. July.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, K., & Hartnett, C. S. (2014). The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries, 2004–07. Population Studies, 68, 265–282. doi:10.1080/00324728.2014.899612
   Google Scholar
• Hersch, J. (2009). Home production and wages: Evidence from the American Times Use Survey. Review of Economics of the Household, 7, 159–178. doi: 10.1007/s11150-009-9051-z
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2014). Female labour force participation and fertility in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 10, 252–273. doi:10.1080/17441730.2014.943941
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. (2015). Women’s wages and fertility hazards in South Korea. Asian Women, 31, 1–27. doi: 10.14431/aw.2015.06.31.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Kye, B. (2012). Cohort effects and period effects? Fertility decline in South Korea in the twentieth century. Population Research and Policy Review, 31, 387–415. doi:10.1007/s11113-012-9232-y
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2014). The gendered division of housework in dual-earner households in Korea. Journal of Social Science, 40, 29–54. Retrieved from http://www.papersearch.net/view/detail.asp?detail_key=1u500633 doi: 10.15820/khjss.2014.40.2.002
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. (2000a). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26, 427–439. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. (2000b). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/BF03029445
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. (2013). Societal foundations for explaining low fertility: Gender equity. Demographic Research, 28, 981–994. Retrieved from http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/34/28-34.pdf doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, A., Bastern, S., & Rotkirch, A. (2011). Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: Evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, 24, 469–496. Retrieved from http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol24/20/24-20.pdf doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.20
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M. L., & Begall, K. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18(1), 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol18/1/18-1.pdf doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.1
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40, 589–603. doi:10.1353/dem.2003.0037
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21, 541–561. doi:10.2307/2137749
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. P., & Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behaviour in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36, 91–118. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00319.x
   Google Scholar
• Morris, L. (1990). The workings of the household. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013). Gender equality and fertility: Which equality matters? European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, 29, 245–272. doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7
   Google Scholar
• Oláh, L. S. (2003). Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 171–200. doi:10.1023/A:1025089031871
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD family database. Retrieved June 7, 2015, from www.oecd.org/social/family/database
   Google Scholar
• Park, H., Byun, S., & Kim, K. (2011). Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea: Focusing on private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 84, 3–22. doi:10.1177/0038040710392719
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2008). A study on the relationship of gender equity within family and second birth. Korean Journal of Population Studies, 31, 55–73. (In Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Raymo, J. M., Musick, K., & Iwasawa, M. (2014). Gender equity, opportunity costs of parenthood, and educational differences in unintended first births: Insights from Japan. Population Research and Policy Review, 34, 179–199. doi:10.1007/s11113-014-9348-3
   Google Scholar
• Spéder, Z., & Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie, 25, 503–523. doi:10.1007/s10680-009-9189-7
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. (2013). Birth Statistics 2013. Social Statistics Bureau, Vital Statistics Division.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Korea. (2014). Vital statistics annual report. The Division of Social Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Tazi-Preve, I. M., Bichlbauer, D., & Goujon, A. (2004). Gender trouble and its impact on fertility intentions. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, 40, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Testa, M. R., & Toulemon, L. (2006). Family formation in France: Individual preferences and subsequent outcomes. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 41–75. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23025477
   Google Scholar
• Torr, B. M., & Short, S. E. (2004). Second births and the second shift: A research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review, 30, 109–130. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00005.x
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2003). Human development report. Geneva: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Upadhyay, U. D., & Karasek, D. (2012). Women’s empowerment and ideal family size: An examination of DHS empowerment measures in sub-Saharan Africa. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 78–89. doi:10.1363/3807812
   Google Scholar