Does ‘Love’ make a difference? Marriage choice and post-marriage decision-making power in India

References

• Adams, B. (2010). Themes and threads of family theories: A brief history. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 41(4), 499–505. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.41.4.499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf, K. (2012). Marital quality from a rural Indian context in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.2307/23267813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf, K. (2013). Schemas of marital change: From arranged marriages to eloping for love. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(2), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allendorf, K., & Pandian, R. (2016). The decline of arranged marriage? Marital change and continuity in India. Population and Development Review, 42(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00149.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk, D. (1994). Individual and community aspects of women's status and fertility in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 48(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000147456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerji, M. (forthcoming). Are the young and educated more likely to have ‘love’ than arranged marriage? A study of autonomy in partner choice. In P. Choudhuri, S. Desai, & A. Dubey (Eds.), India’s social and economictTransformation in twenty-first century. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, V., & Allen, K. (1993). The life course perspective applied to families over time. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 469–504). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blood, R. (1972). The family. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J., Reddy, P., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in south India. Population Studies—A Journal of Demography, 37(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1983.10408866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasGupta, M. (1995). Life course perspectives on women’s autonomy and health outcomes. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1995.97.3.02a00070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Munck, V. C. (1996). Love and marriage in a Sri Lankan Muslim community: Toward a reevaluation of Dravidian marriage practices. American Ethnologist, 23(4), 698–716. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1996.23.4.02a00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S. (1994). Gender inequality and demographic behavior: India. The Population Council.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, S., & Andrist, L. (2010). Gender scripts and age at marriage in India. Demography, 47(3), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, S., Dubey, A., Joshi, L. B., Sen, M., Shariff, A., & Vanneman, R. (2010). Human development in India: Challenges for a society in transition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dharmalingam, A., & Morgan, P. (1996). Women's work, autonomy, and birth control: Evidence from two South India villages. Population Studies, 50(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner, H. (2002). ‘One’s own marriage’: Love marriages in a Calcutta neighbourhood. South Asia Research, 22(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/026272800202200104
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, G. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, G. (1975). Love match and arranged marriage in a modernizing nation: Mate selection in Ankara, Turkey. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/351042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghimire, D., Axinn, W., Yabiku, S., & Thornton, A. (2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 1181–1218. https://doi.org/10.1086/498468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, W. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. Free Press of Glencoe, Collier MacMillan Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1086/498468
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi, S., Schuler, S., & Riley, A. (1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(4), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00159-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindin, M. (2002). For better or for worse? Women’s autonomy and marital status in Zimbabwe. Social Science Research, 31(1), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.2001.0724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, T. (2014). Indian arranged marriages: A social psychological perspective. Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Javed, R., & Mughal, M. (2018). Have a son, gain a voice: Son preference and female participation in household decision making. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(12), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1516871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jejeebhoy, S., & Sathar, Z. (2001). Women's autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00687.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R., & Oster, E. (2009). The power of TV: Cable television and women’s status in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1057–1094. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, R., & Dhanda, P. (2015). Surfing for spouses: Marriage websites and the ‘new’ Indian marriage? In R. Kaur, & R. Palriwala (Eds.), Marrying in South Asia: Shifting concepts, changing practices in a globalising world (pp. 271–292). Orient Blackswan Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Khandelwal, M. (2009). Arranging love: Interrogating the vantage point in cross-border feminism. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(3), 583–609. https://doi.org/10.1086/593341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A. (1991). Gender and changing generational relations: Spouse choice in Indonesia. Demography, 28(4), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., Vanneman, R., & Kishore, S. (1995). Fertility, dimensions of patriarchy, and development in India. Population and Development Review, 21(2), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, K. (1997). How family position influences married women’s autonomy and power in five Asian countries. In M. Cosio-Zavala (Ed.), Women and families: Evolution of the status of women as factor and consequences of changes in family dynamics (pp. 353–370). CICRED.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P. (1992). Convergence or compromise in historical family change? In E. Berquo, & P. Xenos (Eds.), Family systems and cultural change (pp. 15–30). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medora, N. (2003). Mate selection in contemporary India: Love marriages versus arranged marriages. In R. Hamon, & B. Ingoldsby (Eds.), Mate selection across cultures (pp. 209–230). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (1981). The endangered sex: Neglect of female children in rural North India. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S., & Niraula, B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21(3), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesando, L. (2019). Rethinking and revising Goode’s contribution to global family change. Marriage & Family Review, 55(7), 619–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2019.1589619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). The determinants of gender equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s Thesis with new data. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.012_1.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1982). A class and sex stratification model and its relevance for fertility trends. In C. Hohn, & R. Mackensen (Eds.), The developing world: Determinants of fertility trends: Thesis re-examined (pp. 189–202). Ordina Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, M., Rastogi, S., & Vanneman, R. (2006). Disempowered by whom? Gender vs. Generation in family decision making. Paper presented at Population Association of America Annual Conference. Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, S. (1999). Women, family, and child care in India: A world in transition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, K. (2008). Transition from arranged marriage to love marriage and its implications for gender relations in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the IUSSP Seminar on Changing Transitions to Marriage: Gender Implications for the Next Generation, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Sopher, D. (1980). An exploration of India: Geographical perspectives on society and cultures. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. (2005). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uberoi, P. (1998). Family kinship and marriage in India. Oxford India Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar