Latin American readings of Gramsci and the Bolivian indigenous nationalist state

References

• Aparicio, J. R., and M. Blaser. 2008. “The ‘Lettered City’ and the Insurrection of Subjugated Knowledges in Latin America.” Anthropological Quarterly 81 (1): 59–94. doi:10.1353/anq.2008.0000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila Rojas, O. 2017. “La influencia del pensamiento marxista de Antonio Gramsci en la concepción sobre el Estado de René Zavaleta Mercado.” Revista Kavilando 9 (2): 321–574.
   Google Scholar
• Burgos, R. 2004. Los gramscianos argentinos: Cultura y política en la experiencia de Pasado y Presente. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, A. 2014. “Now We are Indígenas: Hegemony and Indigeneity in the Bolivian Andes.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 9 (3): 247–271. doi:10.1080/17442222.2014.959775.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, A. 2020. “Black Hole Indigeneity: The Explosion and Implosion of Radical Difference as Resistance and Power in Andean Bolivia.” Journal of Political Power 13 (2): 179–200. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2020.1764802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaluz, F. 2018. “La especificidad del Estado en América Latina. Apuntes a partir de la obra de René Zavaleta Mercado.” Izquierdas 38: 240–256. doi:10.4067/S0718-50492018000100240.
   Google Scholar
• Canessa, A. 2014. “Conflict, Claim and Contradiction in the New ‘Indigenous’ State of Bolivia.” Critique of Anthropology 34 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1177/0308275X13519275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canessa, A. 2018. “Indigenous Conflict in Bolivia Explored through an African Lens: Towards a Comparative Analysis of Indigeneity.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 60 (2): 308–337. doi:10.1017/S0010417518000063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 1993. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coletta, M., and M. Raftopoulos. 2016. “Whose Natures? Whose Knowledges? An Introduction to Epistemic Politics and Eco-Ontologies in Latin America.” In Provincialising Nature: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Politics of the Environment in Latin America, edited by M. Coletta and M. Raftopoulos, 1–17. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Coletta, M., and M. Raftopoulos. 2018. “Counter-Hegemonic Narratives and the Politics of Plurality: Problematising Global Environmental Governance from Latin America through the Case of Bolivia.” Iberoamericana – Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 47 (1): 108–117. doi:10.16993/iberoamericana.429.
   Google Scholar
• Concheiro Bórquez, E. 2013. “Gramsci En América Latina.” In Horizontes gramscianos. Estudios en torno al pensamiento de Antonio Gramsci, edited by M. Modonesi, 261–276. Mexico: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. 2005. Gramsci Is Dead: Anarchist Currents in the Newest Social Movements. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. 2006. Veinte Tesis de Economía Política. México: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. 1993. “Eurocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures).” Boundary 2 20 (3): 65–76. doi:10.2307/303341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussel, E. 1998. The Underside of Modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor, & the Philosophy of Liberation. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2010. “Latin America at a Crossroads.” Cultural Studies 24 (1): 1–65. doi:10.1080/09502380903424208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2014. Sentipensar con la Tierra. Nuevas Lecturas sobre Desarrollo, Territorio y Diferencia. Medellin: Ediciones Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana (UNAULA).
   Google Scholar
• Farthing, L. 2018. “An Opportunity Squandered? Elites, Social Movements, and the Government of Evo Morales.” Latin American Perspectives 10 (30): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, A. 2014. “The Gramscian Turn: Readings from Brazil, Argentina, and Bolivia.” Contracorriente 11 (2): 278–301.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, A. 2017. “Gramsci in Latin America: Reconstitutions of the State.” PhD diss., Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, A. 2019. “Motley Society, Plurinationalism, and the Integral State: Álvaro García Linera’s Use of Gramsci and Zavaleta.” Historical Materialism 27 (3): 99–126. doi:10.1163/1569206X-00001804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Canclini, N. 1984. “Gramsci con Bourdieu. Hegemonía, Consumo y Nuevas Formas de Organización Popular.” Nueva Sociedad 71: 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á. 2010. Discurso del Vicepresidente del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á. 2011. Las Tensiones creativas de la revolución: La quinta fase del proceso de cambio. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á. 2012. Geopolítica de La Amazonía: Poder hacendal-patrimonial y acumulación capitalista. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado, Presidencia de la Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á. 2014. Identidad boliviana: Nación, Mestizaje y Plurinacionalidad. La Paz, Bolivia: Vicepresidencia del Estado, Presidencia de la Asamblea Legislativa Plurinacional.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á. 2015. Antología: Hacia el Gran Ayllu Universal. Pensar el mundo desde los Andes. Mexico: Altepetl.
   Google Scholar
• García Linera, Á. 2019. “The Military Coup that Overthrew Our Government Was Revenge against Indigenous Bolivians.” Jacobin magazine, November 19. Accessed 30 November 2019 https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/11/evo-morales-coup-indigenous-bolivia-alvaro-garcia-linera
   Google Scholar
• González Casanova, P. 1965. “Internal Colonialism and National Development.” Studies in Comparative International Development 1: 27–37. doi:10.1007/BF02800542.
   Google Scholar
• Goodale, M. 2019. A Revolution in Fragments. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, R. 2007. “The Epistemic Decolonial Turn.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 211–223. doi:10.1080/09502380601162514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudynas, E. 2011. “Buen Vivir: Today’s Tomorrow.” Development 54 (4): 441–447. doi:10.1057/dev.2011.86.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1986. “Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity.” Journal of Communications Inquiry 10 (2): 5–27. doi:10.1177/019685998601000202.
   Google Scholar
• International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. 2020. “Pueblos Indígenas En Bolivia.” IWGIA website. Accessed 25 May 2020 www.iwgia.org/es/Bolivia.html
   Google Scholar
• Lalander, R. 2017. “Ethnic Rights and the Dilemma of Extractive Development in Plurinational Bolivia.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (4): 464–481. doi:10.1080/13642987.2016.1179869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massholder, A. 2011. “La Llegada De Gramsci a La Argentina: Una Relectura Sobre Héctor P. Agosti.” Foro interno 11: 45–67. doi:10.5209/rev_FOIN.2011.v11.37008.
   Google Scholar
• McNelly, A. 2017. “The Contours of Gramscian Theory in Bolivia: From Government Rhetoric to Radical Critique.” Constellations 24 (3): 432–446. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mealla Tapia, L., and P. C. López Flores. 2016. “¿Descolonización o neo- colonización del territorio en Bolivia? La defensa de la territorialidad indígena en tierras bajas frente a la recreación neo-extractivista del colonialismo interno.” In Despojos y Resistencias en América Latina/Abya Yala, edited by C. W. Porto-Gonçalves and L. D. Hocsman, 77–106. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Estudios Sociológicos Editora.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. D. 2012. “Mariátegui and Gramsci in ‘Latin’ America: Between Revolution and Decoloniality.” In The Postcolonial Gramsci, edited by N. Srivastava and B. Bhattacharya, 191–220. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, F. 2016. “The Development of Human Life in Enrique Dussel’s Politics of Liberation.” Inter-American Journal of Philosophy 7 (1): 56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, T., H. Michael, G. Cocco, J. Revel, Á. García Linera, and L. Tapia. 2008. Imperio, multitud y sociedad abigarrada. Buenos Aires: CLACSO/WALDHUTER Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Postero, N. 2013. “Introduction: Negotiating Indigeneity.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 8 (2): 107–121. doi:10.1080/17442222.2013.810013.
   Google Scholar
• Postero, N. 2017. Race, Politics and Performance in Plurinational Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2000. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.” Nepantla: Views from South 1 (3): 533–580.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, A. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 168–178. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. 2016. “The Difference Indigeneity Makes: Socio-Natures, Knowledges and Contested Policy in Ecuador.” In Provincialising Nature: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Politics of the Environment in Latin America, edited by M. Coletta and M. Raftopoulos, 161–186. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S., and S. Westwood. 1996. Remaking the Nation: Place, Identity and Politics in Latin America. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ranta, E. M. 2016. “Toward a Decolonial Alternative to Development? The Emergence and Shortcomings of Vivir Bien as State Policy in Bolivia in the Era of Globalization.” Globalizations 13 (4): 1–15. doi:10.1080/14747731.2016.1141596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindran, T. 2020. “Divergent Identities: Competing Indigenous Political Currents in 21st-century Bolivia.” Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 15 (2): 130–153. doi:10.1080/17442222.2020.1726022.
   Google Scholar
• Stavenhagen, R. 2002. “Indigenous Peoples and the State in Latin America: An Ongoing Debate.” In Multiculturalism in Latin America. Institute of Latin American Studies Series, edited by R. Sieder, 24–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2015a. “The Indigenous Community as ‘Living Organism’: José Carlos Mariátegui, Romantic Marxism, and Extractive Capitalism in the Andes.” Theory and Society 44 (6): 575–598. doi:10.1007/s11186-015-9259-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2015b. “Burdens of a State Manager.” Viewpoint Magazine, February 25. Accessed 25 May 2020 https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:j34N9QpFAHcJ:https://www.viewpointmag.com/2015/02/25/burdens-of-a-state-manager/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-b-1-d
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2019. “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Macho Camacho: Jeffery R. Webber (With Forrest Hylton) on the Coup in Bolivia.” Verso Blog, November 15. Accessed 20 July 2020 https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/4493-the-eighteenth-brumaire-of-macho-camacho-jeffery-r-webber-with-forrest-hylton-on-the-coup-in-bolivia
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. 2016. “Nature, Space, Identity and Resource Extraction: Paradoxes of Discourses around Indigeneity and Environment in Bolivia.” In Provincialising Nature: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Politics of the Environment in Latin America, edited by M. Coletta and M. Raftopoulos, 139–160. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.
   Google Scholar