Co-producing ethnoracial categories: census-takers in the 2017 Peruvian National Census

References

• Albó, X. 2008. Movimientos y poder indígena en Bolivia, Ecuador y Perú [Movements and Indigenous Power in Bolivia, Ecuador, and Peru]. La Paz: Centro de Investigación y Promoción del Campesinado.
   Google Scholar
• Alcocer Martínez, A. 2011. “Lengua y sociedad: El que no tiene de inga tiene de mandinga [Language and Society: He Who Isn’t of Incan Descent is of Malinke Descent].” Letras: Órgano De La Facultad De Letras Y Ciencias Humanas 75 (107/108): 33–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.30920/letras.75.107-108.2.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, P. 2011. “Cultura y desigualdad: discriminación, territorio y jerarquías en redefinición [Culture and Inequality: Discrimination, Territory and Hierarchies Redefined].” In Las desigualdades en el Perú: Balances críticos, edited by J. Cotler and R. Cuenca, 225–272. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussauge, M., G. M. Cejudo, and M. del Carmen Pardo, eds. 2018. Las burocracias a nivel de calle: una antología [Street-level Bureaucracies: An Antology]. Mexico City: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. 2000. Indigenous Mestizos: The Politics of Race and Culture in Cuzco, Peru, 1919–1991. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emigh, R. J., D. Riley, and P. Ahmed. 2016. Antecedents of Censuses from Medieval to Nation States: How Societies and States Count. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gundermann, H. K., J. I. Vergara del Solar, and R. G. Foerster. 2005. “Contar a los indígenas en Chile: Autoadscripción étnica en la experiencia censal de 1992 y 2002 [Counting Indigenous in Chile: Ethnic Self-identification in the Censuses of 1992 and 2002].” Estudios Atacameños 30: 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, C. R. 2005. “Neoliberal Multiculturalism.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 28 (1): 10–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/pol.2005.28.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. E. 2002. “Race of the Interviewer and Perception of Skin Color: Evidence from the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality.” American Sociological Review 67 (1): 99–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3088935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., M. Hill, and A. Buffat. 2015. “Introduction: Defining And Understanding Street Level Bureaucracy.” In Understanding Street-level Bureaucracy, edited by P. Hupe, M. Hill, and A. Buffat, 3–24. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• INEI. 2017. Manual Empadronador - Censos Nacionales 2017 [Census-taker Guide– National Census 2017]. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.
   Google Scholar
• INEI. 2018a. Perú: Perfil Sociodemográfico, Informe Nacional [Peru: Sociodemographic Profile, National Report]. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.
   Google Scholar
• INEI. 2018b. La Autoidentificación Étnica: Población Indígena y Afroperuana [Ethnic Self- Identification: Indigenous and Afroperuvian Populations]. Lima: Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática y Ministerio de Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Isunza-Vera, E. 2019. “La inercia en la espiral de la desigualdad: Visión panorámica de un caso de implementación local de políticas públicas en México [Inertia in the Spiral of Inequality: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Case of Public Policy Local Implementation in Mexico].” Chap. 8 in Implementando Desigualdades: Reproducao de Desigualdades na Implementacao de Políticas Públicas, edited by Roberto Rocha C. Pires, 223–242. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisas Econômica Aplicada.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. E., and K. B. Warren. 2005. “Indigenous Movements in Latin America, 1992–2004: Controversies, Ironies, New Directions.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 549–573. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Cruz Bonilla, J. 2010. “Más allá de la cholificación: Movilidad social ascendente entre los aimaras de Unicachi en Lima [Beyond Cholificación: Upward Social Mobility among Aimaras in Unicachi, Lima].” Debates En Sociología 35: 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S. 2008. El Alto, Rebel City: Self and Citizenship in Andean Bolivia. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, M. 2007. “The U.S. Census and the Contested Rules of Racial Classification in Early Twentieth-Century Puerto Rico.” Caribbean Studies 35 (2): 78–113.
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, M. 2009. “Whiteness in Latin America: measurement and meaning in national censuses (1850-1950).” Journal de la Société des américanistes 95 (2): 207–234.
   Google Scholar
• Loveman, M. 2014. National Colors: Racial Classification and the State in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Novo, C. 2006. Who Defines Indigenous? Identities, Development, Intellectuals and the State in Northern Mexico. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MINEDU (Ministerio de Educación). 2018. Descubrimos ¿De qué regiones hablamos en el perú? [Discovering What Regions We Talk about in Peru]. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Morning, A. 2009. “Toward a Sociology of Racial Conceptualization for the 21st Century.” Social Forces 87 (3): 1167–1192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morning, A. 2011. The Nature of Race: How Scientists Think and Teach about Human Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nobles, M. 2000. Shades of Citizenship: Race and the Census in Modern Politics. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paschel, T. 2016. Becoming Black Political Subjects: Movements and Ethno-Racial Rights in Colombia and Brazil. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, B. M., and G. Moraes Silva. 2018. “Technocrats’ Compromises: Defining Race and the Struggle for Equality in Brazil, 1970–2010.” Journal of Latin American Studies 50 (1): 87–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X17000797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldívar Tanaka, E. 2008. Prácticas cotidianas del estado: una etnografía del indigenismo [Everyday State Practices: An Indigenous Ethnography]. Mexico City: Universidad Iberoamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Saperstein, A. 2006. “Double-Checking the Race Box: Examining Inconsistency between Survey Measures of Observed and Self-Reported Race.” Social Forces 85 (1): 57–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saperstein, A., A. M. Penner, and R. Light. 2013. “Racial Formation in Perspective: Connecting Individuals, Institutions, and Power Relations.” Annual Review of Sociology 39: 359–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, P., V. Piché, and A. A. Gagnon. 2015. Social Statistics and Ethnic Diversity. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L. 2009. “How Many Cases Do I Need?’ on Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-based Research.” Ethnography 10 (1): 5–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulmont, D. 2010. “Raza y etnicidad desde las encuestas sociales y de opinión: dime cuántos quieres encontrar y te diré qué preguntar [Race and Ethnicity in Social and Opinion Surveys: Tell Me How Many You Want to Find and I Will Tell You What to Ask].” Paper presented at workshop “Social Discrimination in Peru: Research and Considerations” organized by the Centro de Investigación de la Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, June 1-23.
   Google Scholar
• Sulmont, D., and N. Valdivia. 2012. “From Pre-modern ‘Indians’ to Contemporary ‘Indigenous People’: Race and Ethnicity in Peruvian Censuses 1827-2007.” In Everlasting Countdowns: Race, Ethnicity and National Censuses in Latin American States, edited by S. Kradolfer and L. F. Angosto-Ferrández, 185–220. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sulmont, D., and J. C. Callirgos. 2014. “El país de todas las sangres? Race and Ethnicity in Contemporary Peru.” In Pigmentocracies. Ethnicity, Race and Color in Latin America, edited by E. Telles, 126–171. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Telles, E. E. 2002. “Racial Ambiguity among the Brazilian Population.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (3): 415–441. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870252932133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telles, E. E., and PERLA. 2014. Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, Race and Color in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valdivia, N. 2011. El uso de categorías étnico/raciales en censos y encuestas en el Perú: balance y aportes para una discusión [The Use of Ethnic/Racial Identities in Censuses and Surveys in Peru: Assessment and Contributions for Discussion]. Lima: Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo.
   Google Scholar
• Vázquez Sandrin, G., and M. F. Quezada. 2015. “Los Indígenas Autoadscritos De México en el Censo 2010: ¿revitalización Étnica O Sobreestimación Censal [Self-identified Indigenous in Mexico in the 2010 Census: Ethnic Come-back or Statistical Overestimation]?” Papeles de Población 21 (86): 171–218.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, M. C. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identity in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. 2011. “Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21: i233–i251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. 2011. “Constructing Ethnicity Statistics in Talk-in-interaction: Producing the ‘White European’.” Discourse & Society 22 (3): 343–361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashar, D. 2006. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar