Numerical analysis of ship–bridge collision's influences on the running safety of moving rail train

References

• AASHTO. 1991. Guide specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridges, Volume I: Final report. Washington (DC): American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Belytschko T. 1980. Partitioned and adaptive algorithms for explicit time integration. In: Wunderlich W, Stein E, Bathe KJ, editors. Nonlinear finite element analysis in structural mechanics. Springer-Verlag. p. 572–584.
   Google Scholar
• Belytschko T, Yen HJ, Mullen R. 1979. Mixed methods for time integration. Comput Method Appl M. 17:259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belytschko TB, Liu WK, Moran B. 2000. Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Consolazio GR, Cook RA, McVay MC, Cowan D, Biggs A, Bui L. 2006. Barge impact testing of the St. George Island causeway bridge, phase III: physical testing and data interpretation. Gainsville (Florida): University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Consolazio GR, Cowan DR. 2003. Nonlinear analysis of barge crush behavior and its relationship to impact resistant bridge design. Comput Struct. 81(8):547–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consolazio GR, Hendrix JL, McVay MC, Williams ME, Bollmann HT. 2004. Prediction of pier response to barge impacts with design-oriented dynamic finite element analysis. Transport Res Rec. 1868:177–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eom B-G, Lee HS. 2010. Assessment of running safety of railway vehicles using multibody dynamics. Int J Precis Eng Man. 11(2):315–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glykas A, Das PK. 2001. Energy conservation during a tanker collision. Ocean Eng. 28(4):361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goble G, Schilz J, Commander B. 1990. Lock and dam #26 field test report for the army corps of engineers. Boulder (CO): Bridge Diagnostics.
   Google Scholar
• Hallquist JO. 2006. LS-DYNA theoretical manual. : Livermore (California):Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Gu Y, Gao Z, Li Y. 2005. Fast evaluation of ship-bridge collision force based on nonlinear numerical simulation. Eng Mech. 22(3):235–242. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ishida H, Matsuo M. 1999. Safety criteria for evaluation of the railway vehicle derailment. Quarterly Report of RTRI. 40(1):18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Knott M, Pruca Z. 2000. Vessel collision design of bridges. In Chen W-F, Duan L. Editors. Bridge engineering handbook. CRC Press: Boca Raton. p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann E, Peschmann J. 2002. Energy absorption by the steel structure of ships in the event of collisions. Mar Struct. 15(4-5):429–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann E, Yu X. 1998. Inner dynamics of bow collision to bridge piers. In Proceedings of the international symposium on advances in ship collision analysis. Copenhagen (Denmark): Balkema Rotterdam. p. 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Gu Y. 2002. Simulation of the whole process of ship-bridge collision. China Ocean Eng. 16(3):369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay MC, Wasman SJ, Consolazio GR, Bullock PJ, Cowan DG, Bollmann HT. 2009. Dynamic soil-structure interaction of bridge substructure subject to vessel impact. J Bridge Eng. 14(1):7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Communications of the PRC. 2004. General code for design of highway bridges and culverts (JTG D60-2004). Beijing: China Communication Press. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Railways of the PRC. 1993. The identification and assessment standards for railway locomotive dynamic performance tests. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Railways of the PRC. 2005. Fundamental code for design on railway bridge and culvert (TB10002.1-2005). Beijing: China Railway Publishing House. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Railways of the PRC. 2010. Code for design of high speed railway (TB 10621-2009). Beijing: China Railway Publishing House. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Nadal MJ. 1896. Théorie de stabilité des locomotives, part II, mouvement de lacet. Annales des Mines. 10:232–255.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2007a. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (Part I: Theory). Ships Offshore Struc. 2(1):69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2007b. Practical techniques for finite element modelling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (Part II: Verification). Ships Offshore Struc. 2(1):81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Patev RC, Barker BC. 2003. Prototype barge impact experiments allegheny lock and dam 2. Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania): US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen PT. 2002. Collision risk for fixed offshore structures close to high-density shipping lanes. P I Mech Eng M. 216(1):29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen PT, Valsgård S, Olsen D, Spangenberg S. 1993. Ship impacts: Bow collisions. Int J Impact Eng. 13(2):163–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simo JC, Ju JW, Pister KS, Taylor RL. 1988. Assessment of cap model: Consistent return algorithms and rate dependent extension. J Eng Mech-ASCE. 114(2):191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson H. 2009. Protection of bridge piers against ship collision. Steel Constr. 2(1):21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Yang L, Huang D, Zhang Z, Chen G. 2008. An impact dynamics analysis on a new crashworthy device against ship-bridge collision. Int J Impact Eng. 35(8):895–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woisin G. 1979. Design against collision. In Proceedings of international symposium on advances in marine technology. Trondheim: GKSS. p. 309–336.
   Google Scholar
• Wuttrich R, Wekezer J, Yazdani N, Wilson C. 2001. Performance evaluation of existing bridge fenders for ship impact. J Perform Constr Fac. 15(1):17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Xia H, Zhang N. 2005. Dynamic analysis of railway bridge under high-speed trains. Comput Struct. 83(23–24):1891–1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan B, Dai GL. 2011. Investigation and countermeasures of ship-bridge collision accidents in China in recent years. Adv Mater Res. 168–170:167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Ocakli H, Pedersen PT. 2004. Crushing of ship bows in head-on collision. Int J Maritime Eng, Trans RINA, Part A. 146(A2):39–46.
   Google Scholar