Three-dimensional numerical model for wave-induced seabed response around mono-pile

References

• Biot MA. 1941. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys. 26(2):155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Chang KT, Jeng D-S. 2014. Numerical study for wave-induced seabed response around offshore wind turbine foundation in Donghai offshore wind farm, Shanghai, China. Ocean Eng. 85:32–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elosta H, Huang S, Incecik A. 2014. Wave loading fatigue reliability and uncertainty analyses for geotechnical pipeline models. Ships Offshore Struct. 9(4):450–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu JRC, Jeng D-S. 1994. Wave-induced soil response in an unsaturated anisotropic seabed of finite thickness. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 18(11):785–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng D-S. 2013. Porous models for wave-seabed interaction. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jeng D-S, Rahman MS, Lee TL. 1999. Effects of inertia forces on wave-induced seabed response. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 9(4):307–313.
   Google Scholar
• Jeng D-S, Ye JH, Zhang JS, Liu PLF. 2013. An integrated model for the wave-induced response around marine structures: model verifications and applications. Coast Eng. 72:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng D-S, Zhao HY. 2015. Two-dimensional model for accumulation of pore pressure in marine sediments. J Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 141:04014042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby JT, Wen L, Shi F. 2003. FUNWAVE 2.0 fully nonlinear Boussinesq wave model on curvilinear coordinates. Newark (NJ): University of Delaware. Research Report CACR-03-xx.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Jeng D-S. 2008. Response of a porous seabed around breakwater heads. Ocean Eng. 35(8–9):864–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Gao FP, Yang B, Zang J. 2011. Wave-induced pore pressure responses and soil liquefaction around pile foundation. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 21(3):233–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passon P, Branner K. 2014. Load calculation methods for offshore wind turbine foundations. Ships Offshore Struct. 9(4):433–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi FY, Dalrymple RA, Kirby JT, Chen Q, Kennedy A. 2001. A fully nonlinear Boussinesq model in generalized curvilinear coordinates. Coast Eng. 42(4):337–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumer BM. 2014. Liquefaction around marine structures. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai CP, Lee TL. 1995. Standing wave induced pore pressure in a porous seabed. Ocean Eng. 22(6):505–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui Y, Helfrich SC. 1983. Wave-induced pore pressure in submerged sand layer. J Geotech Eng. 109(4):603–618.
   Google Scholar
• Ulker MBC. 2012. Pore pressure, stress distributions, and instantaneous liquefaction of two-layer soil under waves. J Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 138:435–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulker MBC. 2015. Semi analytical solution to the wave-induced dynamic response of saturated layered porous media. J Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng. 141(1):06014001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulker MBC, Rahman MS. 2009. Response of saturated and nearly saturated porous media: different formulations and their validity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 33(5):633–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulker MBC, Rahman MS, Jeng D-S. 2009. Wave induced response of seabed: various formulation and their applicability. Appl Ocean Res. 31(1):12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulker MBC, Rahman MS, Guddati MN. 2010. Wave induced dynamic response and instability of seabed around caisson breakwater. Ocean Eng. 37(17–18):1522–1545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulker MBC, Rahman MS, Guddati MN. 2012. Breaking wave-induced response and instability of seabed around caisson breakwater. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 36:362–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G, Kirby JT, Grilli ST, Subramanya R. 1995. A fully nonlinear Boussinesq model for surface-waves.1. highly nonlinear unsteady waves. J Fluid Mech. 294:71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Koning HL, Sellmeijer H, Hijum EV. 1978. On the response of a poro-elastic bed to water waves. J Fluid Mech. 87(1):193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye JH, Jeng D-S, Wang R, Zhu CQ. 2013. A 3-D semi-coupled numerical model for fluid-structures-seabed-interaction (FSSI-CAS 3D): model and verification. J Fluid Struct. 40:148–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye JH, Jeng D-S, Wang R, Zhu CQ. 2015. Numerical simulation of the wave-induced dynamic response of poro-elastoplastic seabed foundations and a composite breakwater. Appl Math Model. 39(1):322–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JS, Jeng D-S, Liu PLF, Zhang C, Zhang Y. 2012. Response of a porous seabed to water waves over permeable submerged breakwaters with bragg reflection. Ocean Eng. 43:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zheng JH, Wang YG, Demirbilek Z. 2011. Modeling wave-current bottom boundary layers beneath shoaling and breaking waves. Geo-Mar Lett. 31(3):189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng JH, Nguyen VT, Zhang C. 2011. Spectral wave transformation model for simulating refraction - diffraction with strongly reflecting coastal structures. Acta Oceanol Sin. 30(2):25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zienkiewicz OC, Chang CT, Bettess P. 1980. Drained, undrained, consolidating and dynamic behavior assumptions in soils. Géotechnique 30(4):385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zienkiewicz OC, Shiomi T. 1984. Dynamic behaviour of saturated porous media; the generalized Biot formulation and its numerical solution. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech. 8(1):71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar