A design method for planing hulls, considering hydro-elasticity and nonlinear dynamic structural response

References

• ABAQUS. 2014. Abaqus 6.14 user manual documentation. Providence (RI): The Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
   Google Scholar
• ABS (American Bureau of Shipping). 2014. Rules for building and classing high-speed craft. Houston (TX): American Bureau of Shipping.
   Google Scholar
• Brizzolara S, Couty N, Hermundstad O, Ioan A, Kukkanen T, Viviani M, Temarel P. 2008. Comparison of experimental and numerical loads on an impacting bow section. Ships Offshore Struct. 3(4):305–324. doi:10.1080/17445300802371162
   Google Scholar
• Constantinescu A, El Malki AA, Neme A, Rigo P. 2009. Numerical and experimental investigations of simple 2-D geometries in slamming. IMDC2009, 10th inter marine design conference; May 2009; Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• DNV (Det Norske Veritas). 2010. Recommended practice DNV-RP-C205. Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads. Norway: Det Norske Veritas AS.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2014. Rules for classification of high speed, light craft and naval surface craft. Norway: Det Norske Veritas AS.
   Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 1997. The effect of hydroelasticity on slamming. Phil Trans Mech Phys Eng Sci. 355:575–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 1999. Water entry of a wedge by hydroelastic orthotropic plate theory. J Ship Res. 43(3):180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 2005. Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 2006. Hydrodynamic features of high-speed vessels. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(1):13–23. doi:10.1533/saos.2005.0010
   Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM, Chezhian M. 2005. A generalized Wagner method for three-dimensional slamming. J Ship Res. 49(4):279–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goda Y. 2000. Random seas and design of maritime structures. Vol. 15. 2nd ed. World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Korobkin AA. 2007. Second-order Wagner theory of wave impact. J Eng Math. 58(1–4):121–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer R., Rampolla B, Magnusson A. 2000. Fatigue of aluminium structural weldments. Ship Structure Committee SSC-410. Washington (DC): US Coast Guard.
   Google Scholar
• Kvalsvold J, Faltinsen OM. 1995. Hydroelastic modeling of deck slamming on multihull vessels. J Ship Res. 39(3):225–239.
   Google Scholar
• LR (Lloyd's Register of Shipping) 2014. Rules and regulations for the classification of special service craft. London: Lloyd's Register.
   Google Scholar
• Maki KJ, Lee D, Troesch AW, Vlahopoulos N. 2011. Hydroelastic impact of a wedge-shaped body. Ocean Eng. 38(4):621–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei X, Lui Y, Yue DKP. 1999. On the water impact of general two-dimensional sections. Appl Ocean Res. 21:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshkovich Y. 2015. A design method for planing hulls, considering hydro-elasticity, dynamics and nonlinear structural response. [master's. thesis]. [Haifa]: Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Oger G, Doring M, Alessandrini B, Ferrant P. 2006. Two-dimensional SPH simulations of wedge water entries. J Comput Phys. 213(2):803–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK. 2006. Some recent developments on ultimate limit state design technology for ships and offshore structures. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(2):99–116. doi:10.1533/saos.2006.0110
   Google Scholar
• Panciroli R, Abrate S, Minak G, Zucchelli A. 2012. Hydroelasticity in water-entry problems: comparison between experimental and SPH results. Compos Struct. 94(2):532–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RINA (Registro Italiano Navale). 2009. Rules for the classification of high-speed craft. Genova: RINA S.p.A.
   Google Scholar
• Scolan YM, Korobkin AA. 2001. Three-dimensional theory of water impact, part 1, inverse Wagner problem. J Fluid Mech. 440:293–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souli M, Benson DJ, editors. 2010. Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian and fluid – structure interaction: numerical simulation. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Von Karman TH. 1929. The impact on seaplane floats, during landing. NACA Technical Notes. 321. Washington (DC): National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics US.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner H. 1936. Phenomena associated with impacts and sliding on liquid surfaces. NACA Library. Washington (DC): National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics US. [ Wagner H. 1932. ÄUber Stoss- und Gleitvorg Äange an der Ober Äache von FlÄussigkeiten. angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik. 12:193–215].
   Google Scholar
• Yettou EM, Desrochers A, Champoux Y. 2007. A new analytical model for pressure estimation of symmetrical water impact of a rigid wedge at variable velocities. J Fluids Struct. 23(3):501–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanirad S, Seif MS, Tabeshpur MR, Yaakob O. 2014. Investigation of hydroelastic effect in analysis of high-speed craft. Ships Offshore Struct. ( September):1–9. doi:10.1080/17445302.2014.954302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Faltinsen OM. 1993. Water entry of two dimensional bodies. J Fluid Mech. 246:593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar