A study on the influence of ageing of coatings on their mechanical properties and fracture in ballast tanks

References

• [Abaqus] Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation. 2014. Abaqus version 6.14 documentation. Analysis user's manual. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim E, Nokleby JO, Carlsson L, Palm M. 2001. Why do paints crack? Ballast tank coating study focuses on brittleness and loss of flexibility. Prot Coatings Eur. 6(3):49–55.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 1995. Standard test method for tensile properties of organic coatings. ASTM Standard D2370-92. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2015. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM Standard E8-15a. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
   Google Scholar
• Balatsos J. 2010. Stochastic fatigue assessment of a container vessel. [Dissertation, Report no. X-10/250]. Gothenburg: Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Croll SG. 1981. Residual strain due to solvent loss from a crosslinked coating. J Coatings Technol. 53(672):85–92.
   Google Scholar
• De Baere K, Verstraelen H, Rigo P, Van Passel S, Lenaerts S, Potters G. 2013. Study on alternative approaches to corrosion protection of ballast tanks using an economic model. Mar Struct. 32(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DNV] Det Norske Veritas. 2010. Classification note no. 30.7: fatigue assessment of ship structures. Hövik: Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2013. Sesam user manual Sestra: superelement structure analysis. Version 8.6. Hövik: DNV GL.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2014a. Sesam user manual HydroD: wave load and stability analysis of fixed and floating structures. Version 4.7. Hövik: DNV GL.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2014b. Sesam user manual Submod: transfer displacement from global model to sub-model. Version 3.0. Hövik: DNV GL.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL 2016. Classification Note DNV GL-CG-0152: PLUS – extended fatigue analysis of ship details. April 2016. Hövik: DNV GL.
   Google Scholar
• Frangopol DM, Tsompanakis Y. 2014. Maintenance and safety of aging infrastructure. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare CH. 1996a. Trouble with paint: more about modulus, time and temperature. J Prot Coatings Linings. 13(4):73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hare CH. 1996b. Trouble with paint: internal stress, Part 1. J Prot Coatings Linings. 13(8):65–75.
   Google Scholar
• [IACS] International Association of Classification Societies. 2015. Guidelines for coating maintenance and repairs for ballast tanks and combined cargo/ballast tanks on oil tankers. IACS Recommendation 87, Revision 2 - 2015. London: International Association of Classification Societies.
   Google Scholar
• IMO Maritime Safety Committee. 2006. Performance standard for protective coatings for dedicated seawater ballast tanks in all types of ships and double-side skin spaces of bilk carriers. Resolution MSC.215(82). London: International Maritime Organization (IMO).
   Google Scholar
• Kim U-N, Choe I-H, Paik JK. 2009. Buckling and ultimate strength of perforated plate panels subject to axial compression: experimental and numerical investigations with design formulations. Ships Offshore Struct. 4(4):337–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon YJ. 2008. Speed loss due to added resistance in wind and waves. The Naval Architect, RINA, March 2008; pp. 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z. 2013. Fatigue assessment of container ships – a contribution to direct calculation procedures [ Dissertation, New series no. 3574]. Gothenburg: Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mao W. 2010. Fatigue assessment and extreme response prediction of ship structures [ Dissertation, new series 3108]. Gothenburg: Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mao W, Ringsberg JW, Rychlik I. 2012. What is the potential of using ship fatigue routing in terms of fatigue life extension? In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE2012); June 17–22; Rhodes; pp. 681–687.
   Google Scholar
• Melchers RE. 1999. Corrosion uncertainty modelling for steel structures. J Construct Steel Res. 52(1):3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchers RE, Jiang X. 2006. Estimation of models for durability of epoxy coatings in water ballast tanks. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(1):61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mills G, Eliasson J. 2006. Factors influencing early crack in marine cargo and ballast tank development. J Protect Coat Lining. 23(2):10–21.
   Google Scholar
• Molin M. (1999). Strain capacity of aged polymeric coating on ship structures [ Dissertation, Report no. CHA/NAV/R-99/0067]. Gothenburg: Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• MSC Software. 2012. Patran 2012, version 2012 [Internet]; [cited 2016 September 12]. Available from: http://www.mscsoftware.com.
   Google Scholar
• Negele O, Funke W. 1996. Internal stress and wet adhesion of organic coatings. Prog Org Coatings. 28(4):285–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oriaifo EA, Perera N, Guy A, Leung PS, Tan KT. 2014. A review of test protocols for assessing coating performance of water ballast tank coatings. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng. 8(10):1691–1696.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2007. Ultimate strength of steel plates with a single circular hole under axial compressive loading along short edges. Ships Offshore Struct. 2(4):355–360.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Melchers RE. 2014. Condition assessment of aged structures. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK. 2006. Some recent developments on ultimate limit state design technology for ships and offshore structures. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(2):99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Perera DY. 1995. Stress phenomena in organic coatings. In: Koleske JV, editor. Paint and coating testing manual. 14th ed. Ann Arbor, MI: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). p. 585–599.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW. 1997. On the mechanical interaction between coating and steel in welded components [Dissertation, Report no. CHA/NAV/R-97/0053]. Gothenburg: Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Ulfvarson AYJ. 1998. On mechanical interaction between steel and coating in stressed and strained exposed locations. Mar Struct. 11(6):231–250.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Li Z, Tesanovic T, Knifsund C. 2015. Linear and nonlinear FE analyses of a container vessel in harsh sea state. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(1):20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song EH, Lee HI, Chung MK, Park CS, Lee CH, Shin, CS, Lee SK, Baek KK. 2006. Why do we have cracks in epoxy coatings for water ballast tanks? Paper presented at: NACE CORROSION-2006 (Paper No. 06015, available on CD-ROM); 2006 March 12–16; San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tesanovic A, Knifsund C. 2012. Global and detailed local fatigue assessment of a container vessel – a comparison between linear and nonlinear FE-analyses [Dissertation, report no. X-12/281]. Gothenburg: Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wang G, Sun H, Peng H, Uemori R. 2009. Buckling and ultimate strength of plates with openings. Ships Offshore Struct. 4(1):49–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T. 2015. Investigation of the fracture behaviour of epoxy-based water ballast tank coatings under static and fatigue loadings [Dissertation]. Cranfield: Department of Materials and Manufacturing, School of Aerospace, Transport, and Manufacturing, Cranfield University.
   Google Scholar
• Wu TH, Foyet A, Kodentsov A, van der Ven LGJ, van Benthem RATM. 2014. Wet adhesion of epoxy-amine coatings on 2024-T3 aluminum alloy. Mater Chem Phys. 145(3):342–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar