Improvement of the construction project of tuna purse seine vessels through a cost and term analysis

References

• Ahsan K, Gunawan I. 2010. Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. Int J Proj Manage. 28:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvariño-Castro R, Azpíroz-Azpíroz JJ, Meizoso-Fernández M. 1997. El proyecto básico del buque mercante [The basic project of the merchant ship]. Madrid: Fondo Editorial de Ingeniería Naval. ISBN: 978-8492175024.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pérez P, Skitmore M, Pellicer E, González-Cruz MC. 2015. Scoring rules and abnormally low bids criteria in construction tenders: a taxonomic review. Constr Manage Econ. 33:259–278. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2015.1059951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce G, Garrard I. 2013. The business of shipbuilding. New York (NY): CRC Press. ISBN: 1317696883.
   Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos L, Diaz-Casas V, Brage RY. 2016. The importance of the activity costs in a shipyard: a case study for floating offshore wind platforms. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–9. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1172830.
   Google Scholar
• Chabane H. 2004. Design of a small shipyard facility layout optimised for production and repair. In: Bekkouche A, editor. Proceedings of the Symposium International: Qualite et Maintenance au Service de l'Entreprise; 2004 Nov 22; Tlemcen (Algeria): Qualima.
   Google Scholar
• Che X, Liebenberg AP. 2017. Effects of business diversification on asset risk-taking: evidence from the U.S. property-liability insurance industry. J Bank Financ. 77:122–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi M, Kim SH, Chung H. 2017. Optimal shipyard facility layout planning based on a genetic algorithm and stochastic growth algorithm. Ships Offshore Struct. 12:486–494. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1176294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Anthony S, Roth EA. 2013. Seeing what's next: using the theories of innovation to predict industry change. Cambridge (MA): Harvard Business Press. ISBN: 1422154645.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo Márquez A, Parra Márquez C, Gómez Fernández JF, López Campos M, González-Prida Díaz V. 2012. Asset management: the state of the art in europe from a life cycle perspective. Dordrecht: Springer. Chapter 5, Life cycle cost analysis; p. 81–99. ISBN: 978-9400727243.
   Google Scholar
• Dai L, Hu H, Chen F. 2015. A GA-based heuristic approach for offshore structure construction spatial scheduling under uncertainty. Ships Offshore Struct. 10:660–668. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.944346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyres DJ, Bruce GJ. 2012. Ship construction. Waltham (MA): Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0080972398.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming QW, Koppelman JM. 2000. Earned value project management. Newtown Square (PA): Project Management Institute. ISBN: 1880410273.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner PD, Stewart K. 2000. Revisiting the golden triangle of cost, time and quality: the role of NPV in project control, success and failure. Int J Proj Manage. 18:251–256. doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00022-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hermarij J. 2013. Better practices of project management based on IPMA competences. Zaltbommel: Van Haren Publishing. ISBN: 9087537964.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu S-H, Wu J-S. 2006. Study on production-oriented design for the capesize bulk carrier: using transverse reinforced double-bottom pipe duct. J Ship Prod. 22:15–20. doi: jsp/2006/00000022/00000001/art00003.
   Google Scholar
• Inozu B, Niccolai M, Whitcomb CA, MacClaren B, Radovic I, Bourg D. 2006. New horizons for shipbuilding process improvement. J Ship Prod. 22:87–98. doi: jsp/2006/00000022/00000002/art00004.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston RE, Bate JD. 2013. The power of strategy innovation: a new way of linking creativity and strategic planning to discover great business opportunities. New York (NY): AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. ISBN: 0814433928.
   Google Scholar
• Kapurch SJ. 2010. NASA systems engineering handbook. Washington (DC): DIANE Publishing Company. ISBN: 978-1437937305.
   Google Scholar
• Keane PJ, Caletka AF. 2015. Delay analysis in construction contracts. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley. ISBN: 111863117X.
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg B, Timberlake R, Geurts TG, Brown RJ. 2013. The relationship of operational innovation and financial performance – a critical perspective. Int J Prod Econ. 142:317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor YY, Leblebici H. 2005. How do interdependencies among human‐capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms' financial performance? Strateg Manage J. 26:967–985. doi: 10.1002/smj.485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb T, Chung H, Spicknall M, Shin JG, Woo JH, Koenig P. 2006. Simulation-based performance improvement for shipbuilding processes. J Ship Prod. 22:49–65. doi: jsp/2006/00000022/00000002/ art00001.
   Google Scholar
• Lamouri S, Thomas A. 2000. The two level master production schedule and planning bills in a just in time MRP context. Int J Prod Econ. 64:409–415. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00077-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee L, Reinicke B, Sarkar R, Anderson R. 2015. Learning through interactions: improving project management through communities of practice. Proj Manage J. 46:40–52. doi: 10.1002/pmj.21473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling FYY. 2004. How project managers can better control the performance of design-build projects. Int J Proj Manag. 22:477–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• [LR] Lloyds-Fairplay. 2015. IHS fairplay register of ships 2015-2016. Redhill: IHS Global Incorporated. ISBN: 978-1906313791.
   Google Scholar
• Moyst H, Das B. 2008. A linear programming approach to optimization of ship design and construction phases. J Ship Product. 24:1–6. doi: jsp/2008/00000024/00000001/art00001.
   Google Scholar
• Murueta Shipyards. Murueta Shipyards facilities information [Internet]. [ cited 2016 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.astillerosmurueta.com.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson J, Bertling L. 2007. Maintenance management of wind power systems using condition monitoring systems— life cycle cost analysis for two case studies. IEEE Trans Energy Convers. 22:223–229. doi: 10.1109/TEC.2006.889623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen P-C, Slepniov D. 2016. Management of the learning curve: a case of overseas production capacity expansion. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 36:42–60. doi: 10.1108/IJOPM-08-2013-0365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [PMI] Project Management Institute. 2014. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guides). Newtown Square (PA): Project Management Institute. ISBN: 978-1628250091.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbani M, Moghaddam M, Manavizadeh N. 2012. Balancing of mixed-model two-sided assembly lines with multiple U-shaped layout. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 59:1191–1210. doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3545-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich BH, Gemino A, Sauer C. 2013. How knowledge management impacts performance in projects: an empirical study. Int J Proj Manage. 32:590–602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revista de Ingeniería Naval (RIN). 2009. Tuna purse seine vessel: Playa de Azkorri. Ingeniería naval: revista técnica de la Asociación de Ingenieros Navales. 876:31–48. doi: https://sectormaritimo.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/200912.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Semini M, Haartveit DEG, Alfnes E, Arica E, Brett PO, Strandhagen JO. 2014. Strategies for customized shipbuilding with different customer order decoupling points. Proc Inst Mech Eng M: J Eng Maritime Environ. 228:362–372. doi: 10.1177/1475090213493770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shengchong L, Wei H, Hongli Z. 2015. Study on the layout planning and optimization for an electronic product workshop based on cell manufacturing. In: Cheng A, DeSouza A, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automation, Mechanical Control and Computational Engineering; 2015 Oct 24; Changsha (China): Atlantis Press. ISBN: 978-1510803084.
   Google Scholar
• Tang O, Grubbström RW. 2002. Planning and replanning the master production schedule under demand uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ. 78:323–334. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00100-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple D, Collette M. 2017. Understanding lifecycle cost trade-offs for naval vessels: minimising production, maintenance, and resistance. Ships Offshore Struct. 12:756–766. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1230039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoft-Christensen P. 2015. User costs in life-cycle cost-benefit (LCCB) analysis of bridges. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management; 2015 Jul 19; Porto (Portugal): CRC Press. ISBN: 1498737005.
   Google Scholar
• USN Direction of Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command. 2005. Naval ships’ technical manual. Arlington (VA): U.S.Navy. (S9086-AA-STM-010/CH-001R45).
   Google Scholar
• Williams GH, Anderson TR. 2016. Impacts to productivity in metal stud framing, and the hanging and finishing of gypsum drywall. In: IEEE, editor. Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology; 2016 Sep 8; Honolulu (HI): IEEE. ISBN: 1509035958.
   Google Scholar