On design criteria for a disconnectable FPSO mooring system associated with expected life-cycle cost

References

• Aanesland V. Kaalstad JP, Bech A, Holm A. 2007. Disconnectable FPSO—technology to reduce risk in GoM. In: Offshore Technology Conference; Apr 30–May 3; Houston (TX): OTC. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• [ABS] American Bureau of Shipping. 2014. Rules for building and classing floating production instalations. Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• [API] American Petroleum Institute. 2001. Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing floating production systems, API recommended practice 2FPS. first. Washington (DC): API Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• [API] American Petroleum Institute. 2005. Design and analysis of stationkeeping systems for floating structures recommended practice 2SK. third. Washington (DC): API Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• [API] American Petroleum Institute. 2007. Interim guidance on hurrican conditions in the Gulf of Mexico API bulletin 2INT-MET. Washington (DC): API Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Aon Oxford Metrica. 2011. Reputation review, improving financial performance with measured communications. [ Internet]. [ accessed 2017 Sep 19]. http://www.oxfordmetrica.com/public/CMS/Files/825/Aon_OxfordMetricaReputationReview_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bea RG. 1994. Evaluation of alternative marine structural integrity programs. Mar Struct. 7(1):77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Béghin D. 2010. Reliability-based structural design. In: Hughes OF, Paik JK, editors. Sh Struct Anal Des. Jersey City (NJ): The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers; p. 5–1–5–63.
   Google Scholar
• [BP] BP Exploration & Production. 2015. Gulf of Mexico environmental recovery and restoration. [ Internet]. [ accessed 2017 Sep 19]. http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp-country/en_us/PDF/GOM/BP_ Gulf_Five_Year_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera-Miranda JM, Paik JK. 2017. On the probabilistic distribution of loads on a marine riser. Ocean Eng. 134:105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos D, Cabrera Miranda JM, Martínez Mayorga JM, García Tenorio M. 2013. Optimal metocean design of offshore tower structures. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2013); June 9–14; Nantes: ASME. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Campos D, Ortega C, Alamilla JL, Soriano A. 2015. Selection of design lower deck elevation of fixed offshore platforms for mexican code. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 137(5):51301–1–51301–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Cao P. 2013. Design of steel lazy wave riser for disconnectable FPSO. In: Offshore Technology Conference; May 6–9; Houston (TX): OTC. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Couckuyt I, Declercq F, Dhaene T, Rogier H, Knockaert L. 2010. Surrogate-based infill optimization applied to electromagnetic problems. Int J RF Microw Comput Eng. 20(5):492–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couckuyt I, Forrester A, Gorissen D, De Turck F, Dhaene T. 2012. Blind kriging: implementation and performance analysis. Adv Eng Softw. 49:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalgic Y, Lazakis I, Dinwoodie I, McMillan D, Revie M, Majumder J. 2015. Cost benefit analysis of mothership concept and investigation of optimum chartering strategy for offshore wind farms. Energy Procedia. 80:63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgic Y, Lazakis I, Turan O, Judah S. 2015. Investigation of optimum jack-up vessel chartering strategy for offshore wind farm O & M activities. Ocean Eng. 95:106–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel J, Mastrangelo CF, Ganguly P. 2013. First floating, production storage and offloading vessel in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. In: Offshore Technology Conference; May 6–9; Houston (TX): OTC. p. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon D, Ang AHS. 2008. Confidence bounds on structural reliability estimations for offshore platforms. J Mar Sci Technol. 13(3):308–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DNV] Det Norske Veritas AS. 2014. Recommended practice DNV-RP-C205, environmental conditions and environmental loads. Høvik.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2015. Offshore standard DNVGL-OS-E301, position mooring. Høvik.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert C, Gatzert N. 2017. Modeling operational risk incorporating reputation risk: an integrated analysis for financial firms. Insur Math Econ. 72:122–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber MH, Straub D, Heredia-Zavoni E, Montes-Iturrizaga R. 2012. Risk assessment for structural design criteria of FPSO systems. part I: generic models and acceptance criteria. Mar Struct. 28(1):120–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang K, Li RZ, Sudjianto A. 2006. Design and modeling for computer experiments. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Garrè L, Rizzuto E. 2012. Bayesian networks for probabilistic modelling of still water bending moment for side-damaged tankers. Ships Offshore Struct. 7(3):269–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heredia-Zavoni E, Montes-Iturrizaga R, Faber MH, Straub D. 2012. Risk assessment for structural design criteria of FPSO systems. part II: consequence models and applications to determination of target reliabilities. Mar Struct. 28(1):50–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang W, Moan T. 2005. Combination of global still-water and wave load effects for reliability-based design of floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels. Appl Ocean Res. 27:127–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IHS Markit. 2017. QUE$TOR. https://www.ihs.com/products/questor-oil-gas-project-cost-estimation-software.html.
   Google Scholar
• [IACS] International Association of Classification Societies. 2017. Common structural rules for bulk carriers and oil tankers. London.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov LD, Ku A, Huang B-Q, Krzonkala VCS. 2011. Probabilistic presentation of the total bending moments of FPSOs. Ships Offshore Struct. 6(1–2):45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain P, Deo MC. 2006. Neural networks in ocean engineering. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(1):25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DK, Kim HB, Zhang X, Li CG, Paik JK. 2014. Ultimate strength performance of tankers associated with industry corrosion addition practices. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 6(3):507–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kübler O, Faber MH. 2004. Optimality and acceptance criteria in offshore design. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 126(3):258–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagaros ND, Karlaftis MG, Paida MK. 2015. Stochastic life-cycle cost analysis of wind parks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 144:117–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langfitt Q, Haselbach L. 2016. Coupled oil analysis trending and life-cycle cost analysis for vessel oil-change interval decisions interval decisions. J Mar Eng Technol. 15(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Jo C, Bergan P, Pettersen B, Chang D. 2016. Life-cycle cost-based design procedure to determine the optimal environmental design load and target reliability in offshore installations. Struct Saf. 59:96–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon A. 2016. Breaking new frontiers. Offshore Eng Sept. 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Li D, Yi C, Xu Z, Bai X. 2014. Scenario research and design of FPSO in South China. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference; June 15–20; Busan: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE). p. 964–969.
   Google Scholar
• [LR] Lloyd's Register. 2016. Rules and regulations for the classification of offshore units. London: Lloyd's Register Group Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrangelo C, Barwick K, Fernandes L, Theisinger E. 2007. FPSOs in the Gulf of Mexico [presentation material]. In: Information Transfer Meeting; Jan 9–11; Kenner (LA).
   Google Scholar
• Moan T. 2011. Life-cycle assessment of marine civil engineering structures. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 7(1–2):11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble Denton Europe Ltd. 2001. Rationalisation of FPSO design issues—relative reliability levels achieved between different FPSO limit states. Norwich: Health & Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Nwaoha TC. 2014. Inclusion of hybrid algorithm in optimal operations of liquefied natural gas transfer arm under uncertainty. Ships Offshore Struct. 9(5):514–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackwitz R. 2000. Optimization — the basis of code-making and reliability verification. Struct Saf. 22(1):27–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimamura Y. 2002. FPSO/FSO: state of the art. J Mar Sci Technol. 7(2):59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl B. 1986. Reliability engineering and risk analysis. In: McClelland B, Reifel MD, editors. Plan Des fixed offshore platforms. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold Company; p. 59–98.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl B, Aune S, Gebara JM, Cornell CA. 2000. Acceptance Criteria for Offshore Platforms. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 122(3):153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H-H, Bai Y. 2001. Time-variant reliability of FPSO hulls. SNAME Trans. 109:341–366.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L, Zhang Q, Ma G, Zhang T. 2017. Analysis of ship collision damage by combining Monte Carlo simulation and the artificial neural network approach. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(sup1):S21–S30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple D, Collette M. 2017. Understanding lifecycle cost trade-offs for naval vessels: minimising production, maintenance, and resistance. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(6):756–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaganathan S, Couckuyt I, Deschrijver D, Laermans E, Dhaene T. 2015. A Matlab toolbox for Kriging metamodelling. Procedia Comput Sci. 51:2708–2713.
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez-Hernandez AO, Ellwanger GB, Sagrilo LVS. 2006. Reliability-based comparative study for mooring lines design criteria. Appl Ocean Res. 28(6):398–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HZ, Zheng W. 2011. Metamodel approach for reliability-based design optimization of a steel catenary riser. J Mar Sci Technol. 16(2):202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar