Numerical investigation of residual ultimate strength of dented metallic pipes subjected to pure bending

References

• Abaqus613. 2013. Abaqus: User's manual, 6.13. Available from: http://129.97.46.200:2080/v6.13/.
   Google Scholar
• Bai Q, Bai Y., 2014a. Subsea pipeline design, analysis, and installation. Oxford (UK): Gulf Professional Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Bai Q., 2014b. Subsea pipeline integrity and risk management. Oxford (UK): Gulf Professional Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnøy O, Rengård O, Fredheim S, Bruce P, et al., 2000. Residual strength of dented pipelines, DNV test results. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Seattle (WA): International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers; p. 182–188.
   Google Scholar
• BSI. 2005. BS7910: guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G., 2016. Residual strength of metallic pipelines subjected to combined loads accounting for impact induced damage. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. St. Jone's: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G., 2017. Residual ultimate strength of offshore metallic pipelines with structural damage–a literature review. Ships Offshore Struct. 12: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Jiang X, Lodewijks G, Pei Z, Zhu L., 2017. Experimental investigation of residual ultimate strength of damaged metallic pipelines. In: Proceeding of the 36th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Rhodes: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Cosham A, Hopkins P., 2004. An overview of the pipeline defect assessment manual (pdam). In: 4th International Pipeline Technology Conference; Belgium: May. p. 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2010. DNV-RP-F111 interference between trawl gear and pipelines. Norway: Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2013. DNV-OS-F101 submarine pipeline systems. Norway: Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Es S, Gresnigt A, Vasilikis D, Karamanos S., 2016. Ultimate bending capacity of spiral–welded steel tubes–part i: experiments. Thin-Walled Struct. 102: 286–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GB/T 1591., 2008. 低合金高强度结构钢 [High strength low alloy structural steels]. China: Chinese National Standard. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Ghaednia H, Das S, Wang R, Kania R., 2015. Effect of operating pressure and dent depth on burst strength of NPS30 linepipe with dent–crack defect. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 137(3): 031402-1–031402-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong S, Ni X, Bao S, Bai Y., 2013. Asymmetric collapse of offshore pipelines under external pressure. Ships Offshore Struct. 8(2): 176–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresnigt A, Karamanos S, Andreadakis K., 2007. Lateral loading of internally pressurized steel pipes. J Pressure Vessel Technol. 129(4): 630–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilberink A., 2011. Mechanical behaviour of lined pipe [PhD thesis]. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides S, Corona E., 2007. Mechanics of offshore pipelines. Vol. 1, Buckling and collapse. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lee GH, Seo JK, Paik JK., 2017. Condition assessment of damaged elbow in subsea pipelines. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1): 135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald K, Cosham A., 2005. Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines–gouges and dents. Eng Fail Anal. 12(5): 720–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manes A, Porcaro R, Ilstad H, Levold E, Langseth M, Børvik T., 2012. The behaviour of an offshore steel pipeline material subjected to bending and stretching. Ships Offshore Struct. 7(4): 371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd MHB, Kim DW, Lee BJ, Kim DK, Seo JK, Paik JK., 2014. On the burst strength capacity of an aging subsea gas pipeline. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 136(4): 041402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd MH, Lee BJ, Cui Y, Paik JK., 2015. Residual strength of corroded subsea pipelines subject to combined internal pressure and bending moment. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(5): 554–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orynyak I., Rozhonyuk, V., Shlapak L., 1999. Residual strength of pipelines with dents. Mater Sci. 35: 689–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik J, Thayamballi A., 2006. Some recent developments on ultimate limit state design technology for ships and offshore structures. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(2): 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pakiding L. 2007. Design criteria for high strength steel joints [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Park T, Kyriakides S., 1996. On the collapse of dented cylinders under external pressure. Int J Mech Sci. 38(5): 557–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabu B, Raviprakash A, Venkatraman A., 2010. Parametric study on buckling behaviour of dented short carbon steel cylindrical shell subjected to uniform axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct. 48(8): 639–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramberg W, Osgood W. 1943. Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note No. 902. Washington (DC): National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilikis D, Karamanos S, Es S, Gresnigt A., 2015. Ultimate bending capacity of spiral–welded steel tubes–part ii: predictions. Thin-Walled Struct. 102: 305–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Li H, Guo X, Li H., 2007. Damage assessment in pipeline structures using modal parameter. Ships Offshore Struct. 2(2): 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Pedersen PT, Ocakli H., 2015. Collisions damage assessment of ships and jack-up rigs. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(5): 470–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar