A reduced-order hydroelastic analysis of 2D hydrofoil considering supercavitation effects

References

• Bagheri MR, Seif MS, Mehdigholi H, Yaakob O. 2017. Analysis of noise behaviour for marine propellers under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behbahani-Nejad M, Changizian M. 2013a. Eigenanalysis and reduced-order modelling of unsteady partial cavity flows using the boundary element method. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 37(9):1151–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behbahani-Nejad M, Changizian M. 2013b. A fast non-iterative numerical algorithm to predict unsteady partial cavitation on hydrofoils. Appl Math Model. 37(9):6446–6457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behbahani-Nejad M, Changizian M. 2015. Reduced-order modeling of three-dimensional unsteady partial cavity flows. J Fluids Struct. 52:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behbahani-Nejad M, Haddadpour H, Esfahanian V. 2005. Reduced order modeling of unsteady flows without static correction requirement. J Aircraft. 42(4):882–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZM. 2012. A vortex based panel method for potential flow simulation around a hydrofoil. J Fluids Struct. 28:378–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JY, Ruzzene M. 2006. Stability analysis of supercavitating underwater vehicles with adaptive cavitator. Int J Mech Sci. 48(12):1360–1370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang J. 2001. Numerical simulation of unsteady partial cavity flow [dissertation]. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Efros D. 1946. Hydrodynamic theory of two-dimensional flow with cavitation. In: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 51:267–270.
   Google Scholar
• Fabula A. 1962. Thin-airfoil theory applied to hydrofoils with a single finite cavity and arbitrary free-streamline detachment. J Fluid Mech. 12(02):227–240.
   Google Scholar
• Haddadpour H, Firouz-Abadi R. 2006. Evaluation of quasi-steady aerodynamic modeling for flutter prediction of aircraft wings in incompressible flow. Thin-Walled Struct. 44(9):931–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KC. 1994. Eigenanalysis of unsteady flows about airfoils, cascades, and wings. AIAA J. 32(12):2426–2432.
   Google Scholar
• Helmholtz H. 1868. About discontinuous fluid movements, monthly report, Academy of Sciences Berlin, Germany, 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Katz J, Plotkin A. 2001. Low-speed aerodynamics. Vol. 13. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnas SA, Fine NE. 1993. A numerical nonlinear analysis of the flow around two- and three-dimensional partially cavitating hydrofoils. J Fluid Mech. 254:151–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnas SA, Lee H, Young YL. 2003. Modeling of unsteady sheet cavitation on marine propeller blades. Int J Rotating Mach. 9(4):263–277.
   Google Scholar
• Kudo T, Kinnas S. 1995. Application of vortex/source lattice method on supercavitating propellers. Proceedings of the 24th American Towing Tank Conference, College Station, TX. p. 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy NL, Prusty BG, Gardiner CP. 2010. Hydroelastic tailoring of flexible composite propellers. Ships Offshore Struct. 5(4):359–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri N, Eslamdoost A. 2009. An iterative scheme for two-dimensional supercavitating flow. Ocean Eng. 36(9):708–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passandideh-Fard M, Roohi E. 2008. Transient simulations of cavitating flows using a modified volume-of-fluid (vof) technique. Int J Comput Fluid Dynam. 22(1–2):97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riabouchinsky D. 1921. On steady fluid motions with free surfaces. Proc London Math Soc. 2(1):206–215.
   Google Scholar
• Tulin MP. 1964. Supercavitating flows small perturbation theory. J Ship Res. 7:16–37.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlman JS. 1987. The surface singularity method applied to partially cavitating hydrofoils. J Ship Res. 2(31):107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlman JS. 1989. The surface singularity or boundary integral method applied to supercavitating hydrofoils. J Ship Res. 33(1):16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz GNVB. 2005. Modelling of sheet cavitation on hydrofoils and marine propellers using boundary element methods [dissertation]. Lisbon: Técnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Huang B, Wang G, Gao Y. 2015. Experimental and numerical investigation of hydroelastic response of a flexible hydrofoil in cavitating flow. Int J Multiphase Flow. 74:19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanirad S, Seif MS, Tabeshpur MR, Yaakob O. 2016. Investigation of hydroelastic effect in analysis of high-speed craft. Ships Offshore Struct. 11(1):16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar