Effect of tip rake angle on the hydrodynamic characteristics and sound pressure level around the marine propeller

References

• Andersen P , Friesch J , Kappel JJ , Lundegaard L , Graham P . 2005. Development of a marine propeller with nonplanar lifting surfaces. Mar Technol. 42(3):144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri MR , Seif MS , Mehdigholi H . 2017. Analysis of noise behaviour for marine propellers under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions. J Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caridi D . 2008. Industrial CFD simulation of aerodynamic noise [ PhD thesis]. Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II.
   Google Scholar
• Carlton JS . 2012. Marine propeller and propulsion, 3rd ed. Elsevier publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng HJ , Chien YC , Hsin CY . 2010. A numerical comparison of end-plate effect propellers and conventional propellers. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Hydrodynamics; Shanghai, China .
   Google Scholar
• Cone J , Clarence D . 1962. The theory of induced lift and minimum induced drag of nonplanar lifting systems, Technical Report, NASA-TR-R-139.
   Google Scholar
• Funeno I . 2002. Analysis of unsteady viscous flows around a highly skewed propeller. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit. 237:39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gaggero S , Gonzalez-Adalid J , Sobrino MP . 2016. Design and analysis of a new generation of CLT propellers. Appl Ocean Res. 59:424–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennaro G , Gonzalez-Adalid J . 2012. Improving the propulsion efficiency by means of contracted and loaded tip (CLT) propellers. Athens .
   Google Scholar
• Gorji M , Ghassemi H , Mohammadi J . 2016. Determining the hydro-acoustic characteristics of the ship propeller in uniform and non-uniform flow. Int J Eng Trans. A: Basics. 29(4):530–538.
   Google Scholar
• Gorji M , Ghassemi H , Mohammadi J . 2017. Effect of rake and skew on the hydrodynamic characteristics and noise level of the marine propeller. Iran J Sci Tech Trans Mech Eng. 1–11. doi:10.1007/s40997-017-0108-y.
   Google Scholar
• Hoshino T . 1993. Hydrodynamic analysis of propeller in unsteady flow using a surface panel method. J Soc Naval Archit Japan. 74:71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hu XF , Huang ZY , Hong FW . 2009. Unsteady hydrodynamics forces of propeller predicted with viscous CFD. J Hydrodyn. 24(6):734–739.
   Google Scholar
• Inukai Y . 2013. A development of a propeller with backward tip raked fin. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Marine Propulsion; Tasmania, Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Jang JC , Kim HT , Joo WH. 2014. Numerical study on non-cavitating noise of marine propeller. In Inter.noise; Nov 16–19; Melbourne, Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Jessup SD . 1989. An experimental investigation of viscous aspects of propeller blade flow [ PhD thesis]. School of Engineering and Architecture, The Catholic University of America.
   Google Scholar
• Kerwin JE , Lee CS . 1978. Prediction of steady and unsteady marine propeller performance by numerical lifting-surface theory. Soc Naval Archit Marine Eng Trans. 86:218–253.
   Google Scholar
• Kheradmand S , Rahrovi A , Mousavi B . 2014. Numerical simulation of tonal and broadband hydrodynamic noises of noncavitating underwater propeller. Polish Marit Res. 21(3):46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W , Yang C . 2009. Numerical simulation of flow around a podded propeller. Proceedings of the 9th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference; Jun 21–26; Osaka, Japan .
   Google Scholar
• Lighthill M . 1952. On sound generated aerodynamically. І. General theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London; March 20; London.
   Google Scholar
• Maghareh M , Ghassemi H . 2017. Propeller efficiency enhancement by the blade's tip reformation. Am J Mech Eng. 5(3):70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Malcom JC . 1997. Encyclopedia of acoustics. New York: John Wiley (Book).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen JR , Shin KW , Lundgren E , Faghani F . 2012. Combined Kappel propeller and rudder bulb system for improved propulsion efficiency. Denmark : MAN Diesel & Turbo, Motorship Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Pan YC , Zhang HX . 2010. Numerical hydro-acoustic prediction of marine propeller noise. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 15(6):707–712.
   Google Scholar
• Park K , Seol H , Choi W , Lee S . 2009. Numerical prediction of tip vortex cavitation behaviour and noise considering nuclei size and distribution. Appl Acoust. 70:674–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salio MP . 2015. Numerical assessment of underwater noise radiated by a cruise ship. J Ships Offshore Struct. 10(3):308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seol H , Jung B , Suh JC , Lee S . 2002. Prediction of non-cavitating uunderwater propeller noise. J Sound Vib. 257(1):131–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seol H , Suh JC , Lee S . 2005. Development of hybrid method for the prediction of underwater propeller noise. J Sound Vib. 288:345–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian J , Yan H , Zhang Z , Yuan G , Rao Z , Hua H. 2014. LES-based numerical analysis of surface-pressure fluctuations and unsteady thrust of a marine propeller. In: Inter. noise. Melbourne, Australia .
   Google Scholar
• Wang C , Huang S , Chang X , He M . 2010. Applying periodic boundary conditions to predict open water propeller performance. J Mar Sci Appl. 9(3):262–267.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M , Marsden AL , Moin P . 2006. Computation and control of trailing-edge noise. Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics; Rome, Italy .
   Google Scholar
• Williams JE , Hawkings DL . 1969. Sound generated by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil Trans R Soc. 264(1151):321–342.
   Google Scholar