New approach to monitoring hull condition of ships as objective for selecting optimal docking period

References

• Bohlander J. 2009 Jul. Review of options for in-water cleaning of ships. Maf biosecurity New Zealand technical paper no: 2009/42. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/pests/saltfreshwater/options-for-in-water-cleaning-of-ships.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cordell J, Sosik E, Faulkner M, Scianni C. 2009 Oct. Characterizing risk associated with vessel fouling and nonindigenous species in Prince William Sound. Prepared by the School of Aquatic and Fishery Science, University of Washington and the California State Lands Commission for the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens Advisory Council. http://www.pwsrcac.org/docs/d0081980.UWHullFouling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coutts A. 1999. Hull fouling as a modern vector for marine biological invasions: investigation of merchant vessels visiting Northern Tasmania [thesis]. Australian Maritime College. 283pp.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts A, Taylor M. 2004. A preliminary investigation of biosecurity risks associated with bio fouling on merchant vessels in New Zealand. New Zeal J Mar Fresh Res. 38:215–229. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2004.9517232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson I, Ruiz G, Sytsma M, Fofonoff. 2006. Hull fouling on the vessels Point Loma and Florence in the reserve fleet at Suisun Bay, CA: a pilot study with respect to potential transfer of non-native species. US Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration.
   Google Scholar
• ENIRAM Studies. 2013a. Study of hull fouling on cruise vessels across various seas. http://www.eniram.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/hull-fouling-study-1.12mb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ENIRAM Studies. 2013b. Methods for hull and propeller performance monitoring (part 1). https://www.eniram.fi/methods-for-hull-and-propeller-performance-monitoring-part-1/.
   Google Scholar
• Etkin D. 2010. Worldwide analysis of in-port vessel operational lubricant discharges and leaks. Proceedings of the 33rd Arctic and Marine Oil spill Program Technical Seminar. p. 529–554.
   Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Inglis G, Marsh HM. 2005. Selectivity in vector management: an investigation of the effectiveness of measures used to prevent transport of non-indigenous species. Biol Invasions. 7(3): 459–75. doi: 10.1007/s10530-004-4863-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Peacock L, Seaward K, Inglis G. 2010 Sep. Review of biosecurity and contaminant risks associated with in-water cleaning. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• International standard: ship and marine technology – measurement of changes in hull and propeller performance – part 1; general principles, reference number ISO 19030-1: 2016 (E), 1st ed. 2016 Nov 15.
   Google Scholar
• International standard: ship and marine technology – measurement of changes in hull and propeller performance – part 2; default method, reference number ISO 19030-2: 2016 (E), 1st ed. 2016 Nov 15.
   Google Scholar
• International standard: ship and marine technology – measurement of changes in hull and propeller performance – part 3; alternative methods, reference number ISO 19030-3: 2016 (E), 1st ed. 2016 Nov 15.
   Google Scholar
• Logan KP. 2011. Using ship’s propeller to detect hull fouling. Presented at ASNE Intelligent Ships Symposium IX; May 25; Philadelphia, PA. http://www.sname.org/higherlogic/system/downloaddocumentfile.ashx?documentfilekey=0e63aaa1-63da-495a-9f77-769f9cb16ab8.
   Google Scholar
• Minchin D, Gollasch S. 2003. Fouling and ships’ hulls: How changing circumstances and spawning events may result in the spread of exotic species. Biofouling. 19: 111–22. doi: 10.1080/0892701021000057891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DS, McCabe GP, Craig BA. 2014. Introduction to the practice of statistics. New York: W.H. Freemen. ISBN-13;978-4641-5893-3 (student ed., hardcover).
   Google Scholar
• Mosaad M. 1986 Aug. Marine propeller roughness penalties [PhD thesis]. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Munk T, Kane D. 2011 Jun. Technical fuel conservation policy and hull and propeller performance. Royal Institute of Naval Architects Design and Operation of Tankers Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Munk T, Kane D, Yebra DM. 2009. The effects of corrosion and fouling on the performance of ocean-going vessels: a naval architectural perspective. In: Hellio C, Yebra D, editors. Chapter 7 of Advances in marine antifouling coatings and technologies. Woodhead Publishing in Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Railkin AI. 2004. Marine biofouling: colonization processes and defences. Washington, DC: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takata L, Dobrowski N, Scianni C, Faulkner M. 2011 Jan. Biennial report on the California marine invasive species program. Produced for the California State Legislature by the California State Lands Commission, Marine Facilities Division.
   Google Scholar
• Takata L, Falkner M, Gilmore S. 2006. Commercial vessel fouling in California: analysis, evaluation, and recommendations to reduce nonindigenous species release from the non-ballast water.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2011 Nov. Underwater ship husbandry discharges, EPA 800-R11-004. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://groups.ucanr.org/ballast_outreach/files/25918.pdf.
   Google Scholar