Kriging models for aero-elastic simulations and reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structures

References

• Agarwal P, Manuel L. 2007. Simulation of offshore wind turbine response for extreme limit states. Proceedings of OMAE2007 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 10–15 June 2007, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Barker TB. 2005. Quality by experimental design. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Box GE, Hunter WG, Hunter JS. 1978. Statistics for experimenters.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher C, Bourgund U. 1990. A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems. Struct Saf. 7(1):57–66. doi: 10.1016/0167-4730(90)90012-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush E, Manuel L. 2009. Foundation models for offshore wind turbines. ASME wind energy symposium; AIAAOrlando; Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Carswell W, Arwade SR, DeGroot DJ, Lackner MA. 2014b. Soil-structure reliability of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations. Wind Eng. doi: 10.1002/we.1710
   Google Scholar
• Carswell W, Arwade S, Myers A, Hajjar J. 2014a. Reliability analysis of monopile offshore wind turbine support structures. Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures and Infrastructures.223.
   Google Scholar
• Couckuyt I, Dhaene T, Demeester P. 2014. Oodace toolbox: a flexible object-oriented kriging implementation. J Mach Learn Res. 15(1):3183–3186.
   Google Scholar
• Der Kiureghian A, Haukaas T, Fujimura K. 2006. Structural reliability software at the University of California, Berkeley. Struct Saf. 28(1):44–67. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNV. 2010. Fatigue design of offshore steel structures. Recommended practice DNV-RP-C203; Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer T, De Vries W, Schmidt B. 2010. UpWind design basis (WP4: Offshore foundations and support structures). Project UpWind.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar B, Teixeira A, Soares CG. 2014. Assessment of the efficiency of kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis. Prob Eng Mech. 37:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenbichler M, Gollwitzer S, Kruse W, Rackwitz R. 1987. New light on first-and second-order reliability methods. Struct Saf. 4(4):267–284. doi: 10.1016/0167-4730(87)90002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC. 2005. Iec 61400-1: wind turbines–part 1: design requirements. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IEC. 2009. Iec 61400-3: wind turbines–part 3: design requirements for offshore wind turbines. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jha A, Dolan D, Gur T, Soyoz S, Alpdogan C. 2009. Comparison of API & IEC standards for offshore wind turbine applications in the US Atlantic Ocean: phase II. Contract. 303:275–3000.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman BJ. 2009. Turbsim user’s guide: version 1.50. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman JM, Buhl MLJ. 2005. FAST user’s guide - technical report NREL/EL-500-38230 national renewable energy laboratory; Colorado. Report nr 144 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman J, Musial W. 2010. Offshore code comparison collaboration (OC3) for IEA wind task 23 offshore wind technology and deployment. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
   Google Scholar
• Jonkman JM, Butterfield S, Musial W, Scott G. 2009. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Colorado: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Report nr NREL/TP-500-38060.
   Google Scholar
• Kaymaz I. 2005. Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct Saf. 27(2):133–151. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Lee SG. 2015. Reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structures under extreme ocean environmental loads. Renew Energ. 79:161–166. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lataniotis C, Marelli S, Sudret B. 2015. Uqlab user manual–Kriging (gaussian process modelling), report UQLab-V0.9-105, chair of risk, safety & uncertainty quantification. Zurich: ETH.
   Google Scholar
• Morató A, Sriramula S, Krishnan N, Nichols J. 2017. Ultimate loads and response analysis of a monopile supported offshore wind turbine using fully coupled simulation. Renew Energ. 101:126–143. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morató Casademunt A, Sriramula S, Krishnan N. 2015. A computational framework for the reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures. Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems; Sep; ESREL; Zurich, Switzerland. pp. 4181–4187.
   Google Scholar
• Morató Casademunt A, Sriramula S, Krishnan N. 2016. Reliability analysis of offshore wind turbine support structures using kriging models. Safety and reliability of complex engineered systems; Sep; ESREL; Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Muskulus M, Schafhirt S. 2015. Reliability-based design of wind turbine support structures. Symposium on Reliability of Engineering System. SRES; Hangzhou, China. pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• NORSOK. 2004. Design of steel structures. standard N-004. Lysaker: Standards Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Norton E, Quarton D. 2003. Recommendations for design of offshore wind tubines (RECOFF). D3 Deliverable-Collated Sensitivity Studies, Document No. 2762.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen CE. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks J, Schiller SB, Welch WJ. 1989. Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics. 31(1):41–47. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1989.10488474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI. 2013. The design and analysis of computer experiments. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Shi X, Palos Teixeira Â, Zhang J, Guedes Soares C. 2015. Kriging response surface reliability analysis of a ship-stiffened plate with initial imperfections. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 11(11):1450–1465. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.976575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen JD, Tarp-Johansen N. 2005. Reliability-based optimization and optimal reliability level of offshore wind turbines. Int J Offshore Polar. 15(02):245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen JD, Toft HS. 2010. Probabilistic design of wind turbines. Energies. 3(2):241–257. doi: 10.3390/en3020241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GG. 2003. Adaptive response surface method using inherited latin hypercube design points. Trans-Am Soc Mech Eng J Mech Design. 125(2):210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Arwade SR, Myers AT. 2014. Incremental wind-wave analysis of the structural capacity of offshore wind turbine support structures under extreme loading. Eng Struct. 79:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Zhu Y, Lu Q, Zhang J. 2015. Dynamic reliability based design optimization of the tripod sub-structure of offshore wind turbines. Renew Energ. 78:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Lu Z, Wang P. 2015. Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced kriging model. Appl Math Model. 39(2):781–793. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar