Investigation of planing vessels motion using nonlinear strip theory – an experimental and numerical study

References

• Akers RH. 1999. Dynamic analysis of planing hulls in the vertical plane. Proceedings of the Meeting of the New England Section of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME’99), Ship Motion Associates Portland, Maine.
   Google Scholar
• Akers RH. 2014. A Method of Structural Load Prediction for High-Speed Planing Craft. Maine Marine Composites LLC, Portland, Maine, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Begovic E, Bertorello C, Pennino S. 2014. Experimental seakeeping assessment of a warped planing hull model series. Ocean Eng. 83:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridsma G. 1969. A systematic study of the rough-water performance of planing boats. Tech. Rep. Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Fridsma G. 1971. A systematic study of the rough-water performance of planing boats–part 2 irregular waves. Tech. Rep. 1275, Davidson Laboratory, Stevens, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Dashtimanesh A, Djeddi SR, Maghrebi YF. 2013a. Development of a mathematical model for simultaneous heave, pitch and roll motions of planing vessel in regular waves. Int J Sci World. 1:44–56. doi: 10.14419/ijsw.v1i2.1056
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Dashtimanesh A, Faghfoor Maghrebi Y. 2013b. Initiating a mathematical model for prediction of 6-DOF motion of planing crafts in regular waves. Int J Eng Math. 2013:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2013/853793
   Google Scholar
• Hicks JD, Troesch AW, Jiang C. 1995. Simulation and nonlinear dynamics analysis of planing hulls. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 117(1):38–45. doi: 10.1115/1.2826989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2005. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Testing and Extrapolation Methods (Resistance Test for High Speed Marine Vehicles) 7.5-02-05-01.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2008a. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Ship Models ITTC Report 7.5-01-01-01.
   Google Scholar
• Journèe JM, Massie W. 2001. Offshore hydrodynamics. Delft University of Technology. 4:38.
   Google Scholar
• Keuning JA. 1994. Nonlinear behaviour of fast monohulls in head waves. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology., 106.
   Google Scholar
• Martin M. 1976. Theoretical prediction of motions of high-speed planing boats in waves. Bethesda, MD: David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center. Report 76-0069.
   Google Scholar
• Payne P. 1994. Recent developments in “added-mass” planing theory. Ocean Eng. 21(3):257–309. doi: 10.1016/0029-8018(94)90002-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne PR. 1981. The vertical impact of a wedge on a fluid. Ocean Eng. 8(4):421–436. doi: 10.1016/0029-8018(81)90035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne PR. 1995. Contributions to planing theory. Ocean Eng. 22(7):699–729. doi: 10.1016/0029-8018(94)00033-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennino S. 2014. Vertical motion assessment for planing hulls. Ph.D. thesis. University of Naples “Federico II”. Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson JD, Dingee DA, Neidinder JW. 1954. A hydrodynamic study of the chines-dry planing body. Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken Experimental Towing Tank.
   Google Scholar
• Sayeed TM, Peng H, Veitch B, Billard R. 2013. Numerical simulation of fast rescue crafts in waves and its application in a training simulator. J Ocean Technol. 8(4):41–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastiani L, Bruzzone D, Gualeni P, Rambaldi G, Ruscelli D, Viviani M. 2008. A practical method for the prediction of planing craft motions in regular and irregular waves. ASME 2008 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. p. 687–696.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow J. 1938. Über den Einfluss von Federung und Kielung auf den Landestoss. Zentrale für wiss. Berichtswesen bei der Deutschen Versuchsanstalt für Luftfahrt.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli S, Ghadimi P, Dashtimanesh A. 2017. A nonlinear mathematical model for coupled heave, pitch, and roll motions of a high-speed planing hull. J Eng Math. 104(1):157–194. doi: 10.1007/s10665-016-9878-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deyzen A. 2008. A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planning monohull in head seas. Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Von Kármán T. 1929. The impact on seaplane floats during landing. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
   Google Scholar
• Vorus WS. 1996. A flat cylinder theory for vessel impact and steady planing resistance. J Ship Res. 40:89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner H. 1932. The phenomena of impact and planing on water. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Translation 1366, ZAMM 12. p. 193–215.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi R, Shafaghat R, Shakeri M. 2013. Hydrodynamic analysis techniques for high-speed planing hulls. Appl Ocean Res. 42:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarnick EE. 1978. A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planing boat in regular waves. David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zarnick EE. 1979. A non-linear mathematical model of motions of a planning boat in irregular waves. Tech. Rep. David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Faltinsen O. 1993. Water entry of two-dimensional bodies. J Fluid Mech. 246:593–612. doi: 10.1017/S002211209300028X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar