262
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A residual strain energy based damage localisation method for offshore platforms under environmental variations

, &
Pages 747-754 | Received 23 Mar 2018, Accepted 05 Dec 2018, Published online: 20 Dec 2018

References

  • Abdi H, Williams LJ. 2010. Principal component analysis. WIREs Computation Stat. 2(4):433–459. doi: 10.1002/wics.101
  • Alampalli S. 1998. Influence of in-service environment on modal parameters. Proceedings of the 16th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC-XVI), Santa Barbara, California. 1:111–116.
  • Azzara RM, Roeck GD, Girardi M, et al. 2018. The influence of environmental parameters on the dynamic behaviour of the San Frediano bell tower in Lucca. Eng Struct. 156:175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.045
  • Boubaker MB, Picard D, Duchesne C, et al. 2017. Non-destructive testing of baked anodes based on modal analysis and principal component analysis. In: 2017 TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition, San Diego, CA, Light Metals 2017, Springer International Publishing, p. 1289–1298.
  • Fan W, Qiao P. 2011. Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study. Struct Health Monit. 10(3):83–111. doi: 10.1177/1475921710365419
  • Kullaa J. 2001. Elimination of environmental influences from damage-sensitive features in a structural health monitoring system. Structural Health Monitoring—the Demands and Challenges; CRC Press, p. 742–749.
  • Li H, Li SL, Ou JP, Li HW. 2010. Modal identification of bridges under varying environmental conditions: temperature and wind effects. Struct Control Health Monit. 17:495–512. doi: 10.1002/stc.294
  • Mojtahedi A, Yaghin M, Hassanzadeh Y, et al. 2011. Developing a robust SHM method for offshore jacket platform using model updating and fuzzy logic system. Appl Ocean Res. 33(4):398–411. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2011.05.001
  • Peeters B, De Roeck G. 2000. One year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental influences versus damage events. Imac-Xviii: A Conference on Structural Dynamics, 1 and 2.
  • Peeters B, Maeck J, De Roeck G. 2001. Vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering: excitation sources and temperature effects. Smart Mater Struct. 10:518–527. doi: 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/314
  • Pimentel MAF, Clifton DA, Lei C, Tarassenko L. 2014. A review of novelty detection. Signal Process. 99(6):215–249. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.026
  • Sohn H, Dzwonczyk M, Straser EG, et al. 1999. An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon bridge. Earthquake Eng Struc. 28:879–897. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199908)28:8<879::AID-EQE845>3.0.CO;2-V
  • Sohn H, Worden K, Farrar R. 2001. Novelty detection under changing environmental conditions. Proc SPIE-Int Soc Opt Eng. 36:1417–1437.
  • Stubbs N, Kim JT, Topole K. 1992. An efficient and robust algorithm for damage localization in offshore platforms. Proceedings of the ASCE 10th Structures Congress; San Antonio, USA.
  • Wang SQ, Nie JW, Zhang M. 2014. Structural novelty detection based on Hilbert-Huang transform and principal component analysis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference.
  • Wang SQ, Xu MQ. 2018. Modal strain energy-based structural damage identification: a review and comparative study. Struct Eng Int. 1–15. doi:10.1080/10168664.2018.1507607.
  • Woon CE, Mitchell LD. 1998. Variations in structural dynamic characteristics caused by changes in ambient temperature, Part I: Experimental. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference. On Vibration Measurements by Laser Techniques: Advances and Applications.
  • Xu MQ, Wang SQ, Jiang YF. 2018. Iterative two-stage approach for identifying structural damage by combining the modal strain energy decomposition method with the multiobjective particle swarm optimization algorithm. Struct Control Health Monit. e2301. doi:10.1002/stc.2301.
  • Yan AM, Kerschen G, De Boe P, et al. 2005. Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - part II: local PCA for non-linear cases. Mech Syst Signal Pr. 19:865–880. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.12.003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.