A new method for the structural optimisation of a common type of square wing plate used in the wave glider

References

• Amabili M, Balasubramanian P, Breslavsky ID, Ferrari G, Garziera R, Riabova K. 2016. Experimental and numerical study on vibrations and static deflection of a thin hyperelastic plate. J Sound Vib. 385:81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A. 2016. Sensitivity and error analysis of a coupled micro-resonator array for ultra-sensitive mass detection using matrix perturbation theory. IEEE Sens J. 16(5):1304–1309. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2015.2499266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves-Vargas M, Dafnis A, Reimerdes HG, Schröder KU. 2015. Modal parameter identification of a compression-loaded CFRP stiffened plate and correlation with its bucking behavior. Prog Aerosp Sci. 78(SI):39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.05.009
   Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Li YC, Ma Z, Chen HX. 2015. Hydrodynamic design and analysis on the underwater glider. J Shipbuild China. 56(3):39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel J, Manley J, Trenaman N. 2011. The wave glider enabling a new approach to persistent ocean observation and research. Ocean Dyn. 61(10):1509–1520. doi: 10.1007/s10236-011-0408-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druecker S, Steglich D, Merckelbach L, Werner A, Bargmann S. 2016. Finite element damage analysis of an underwater glider-ship collision. J Mar Sci Technol. 21(2):261–270. doi: 10.1007/s00773-015-0349-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox RL, Kapoor MP. 2012. Rates of change of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors. AIAA J. 6(12):2426–2429. doi: 10.2514/3.5008
   Google Scholar
• Frolov S, Bellingham J, Anderson W, et al. 2011. Wave glider – a platform for persistent monitoring of algal blooms. MTS/IEEE Kona Conference, OCEANS'11; Sep 19–22; Waikoloa, HI, USA. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh Ram RK, Cooper YN, Bhatia V, Karthikeyan R, Periasamy C. 2014. Design optimization and analysis of NACA 0012 airfoil using computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithm. Appl Mech Mater. 664:111–116. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.664.111
   Google Scholar
• Hine R, Willcox S, Hine G, et al. 2009. The wave glider: a wave-powered autonomous marine vehicle. MTS/IEEE Biloxi - Marine Technology for Our Future: Global and Local Challenges, OCEANS 2009; Oct 26–29; Biloxi, MS, USA. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonka A. 2016. Stochastic sensitivity analysis for structural dynamics systems via the second-order perturbation. Arch Appl Mech. 86(11):1913–1926. doi: 10.1007/s00419-016-1149-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid MY, Ovinis M, Hashim FBM, Maimun A, Ahmed YM. 2017. Effect of wing form on the hydrodynamic characteristics and dynamic stability of an underwater glider. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng. 9(4):382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia LJ. 2014a. Study of operation principle of two-part architecture and dynamic behavior of wave glider [Master Thesis]. National Ocean Technology Center.
   Google Scholar
• Jia LJ, Zhang XM, Qi ZF, Qin YF, Sun XJ. 2014b. Hydrodynamic analysis of submarine of the wave glider. Adv Mater Res. 834–836:1505–1511. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.834-836.1505
   Google Scholar
• Liu P, Su YM, Liu HX, Liao YL. 2014. Propulsive performance analysis of tandem asynchronous flapping foil. J Shanghai Jiao Tong U. 48(4):457–463.
   Google Scholar
• Mejri S, Gagnol V, Le TP, Sabourin L, Ray P. 2011. Dynamic characterization of machining robot and stability analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 82:351–359. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7336-3
   Google Scholar
• Ngo P, Al-Sabban W, Thomas J, Anderson W, Das J. 2013. An analysis of regression models for predicting the speed of a wave glider autonomous surface vehicle. In: Proceedings of Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation. Sydney, Australian: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Olson RA. 2012. Communications architecture of the liquid robotics wave glider. Ifac Proc Volumes. 45(5):255–259. doi: 10.3182/20120410-3-PT-4028.00042
   Google Scholar
• Orlowitz E, Brandt A. 2016. Operational modal analysis for dynamic characterization of a Ro-Lo ship. J Ship Res. 58(4):216–224. doi: 10.5957/JOSR.58.4.140015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasid ZA. 2015. The natural frequency of the shape memory alloy anti-symmetric angle-ply composite plates using finite element method. Appl Mech Mater. 695(2):52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha PAC, Albiero D, Fernandes MPG, Fernandes JL. 2015. Aerodynamic performance of NACA four-digit profiles in small-scale wind turbines for small farms. Semin-Cienc Agrar. 36(3):1227–1239. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n3p1227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin I, Acir A. 2015. Numerical and experimental Investigations of lift and drag Performances of NACA 0015 wind turbine airfoil. Int J Mater Mech Manuf. 3(1):22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Singh Y, Bhattacharyya SK, Idichandy VG. 2017. CFD approach to modelling, hydrodynamic analysis and motion characteristics of a laboratory underwater glider with experimental results. J Ocean Eng Sci. 2(2):90–119. doi: 10.1016/j.joes.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun HG, Li YJ, Ye B. 2016. Numerical analysis of Effects of leading edge radius on resistance to foreign objective damage capability of titanium alloy blade. Aeroengine. 42(2):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker P. 1980. Differential and difference sensitivities of natural frequencies and modal shapes of mechanical structures. AIAA J. 18(12):1511–1514. doi: 10.2514/3.7738
   Google Scholar
• Villareal TA, Wilson C. 2014. A comparison of the Pac-X Trans-Pacific wave glider data and Satellite data (MODIS, Aquarius. TRMM and VIIRS). Plos One. 9(3):1–5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhao QJ, Wang B. 2016. Influence of leading edge shape on dynamic stall characteristics of airfoil. J Nanjing U Aeronaut Astronautics. 48(2):205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Cao JJ, Yao BH, Lian L. 2017. Configuration and hydrodynamic performance calculation of an underwater glider. J Ship Sci Technol. 39(3):107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Yao W, Jaiman RK. 2017. Feedback control of unstable flow and vortex-induced vibration using the eigensystem realization algorithm. J Fluid Mesh. 827:394–414. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2017.470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao BQ. 2016. The Horizontal fixed wing design of underwater glider. J Ship Sci Technol. 38(1):103–107.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng BH, Xu CY, Yao CL, Chen JW. 2015. The effect of attack angle on the performance of wave glider wings. Appl Mech Mater. 727–728:587–591. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.727-728.587
   Google Scholar