Structural optimisation of a bulk carrier according to IACS CSR-BC

References

• Andrade SL, Gaspar HM, Ehlers S. 2017. Parametric structural analysis for a platform supply vessel at conceptual design phase – a sensitivity study via design of experiments. Ships Offsh Struct. 12(1):209–220. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1262728
   Google Scholar
• Andric J, Kitarovic S, Bicak M. 2014. IACS Incremental-iterative method in progressive collapse analyses of various hull girder structures. Brodogradnja. 65(1):65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andric J, Piric K, Prebeg P, Andrisic J, Dmitrasinovic A. 2018. Structural design and analysis of a large ‘open type’ livestock carrier. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(S1):S167–S181. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1429159
   Google Scholar
• Andric J, Zanic V, Grgic M. 2010. Structural optimization of corrugated transverse bulkheads made of stainless steel. Brodogradnja. 61(1):18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprace J D, Bair F, Rigo P. 2010. Multi-criteria scantling optimization of cruise ships. Ship Technol Res-Schifftechnick. 57(3):210–220. doi: 10.1179/str.2010.57.3.006
   Google Scholar
• Hughes OF. 1983. Ship structural design: a rationally-based, Computer-Aided, optimization approach. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes OF, Mistree F, Zanic V. 1980. A practical method for the rational design of ship structures. J Ship Res. 24(2):101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes OF, Paik JK. 2010. Ship structural analysis and design. Jersey City (NJ): The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2012. Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers, July 2012.
   Google Scholar
• ISSC. 2012. Technical Committee IV.2. Design Methods. In: Fricke W, Bronsart R, editors. Proceedings of the 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Rostock, Germany, Vol. 1; p. 507–584.
   Google Scholar
• ISSC. 2015. Technical Committee IV.2. Design Methods. In: Guedes Soares C, Garbatov Y, editors. Proceedings of the 19th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Lisbon, Portugal, Vol. 1; p. 459–518.
   Google Scholar
• ISSC. 2018. Technical Committee IV.2. Design Methods. In: Kaminski M, Rigo P. Proceedings of the 20th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Liege-Amsterdam, Belgium-Netherlands, Vol. 1; p. 609–708.
   Google Scholar
• Kim DK, Kim HB, Zhang XM, Li CG, Paik JK. 2014. Ultimate strength performance of tankers associated with industry corrosion addition practices. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. 6(3):507–528. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DK, Kim SJ, Kim HB, Zhang XM, Li CG, Paik JK. 2015. Ultimate strength performance of bulk carriers with various corrosion additions. Ships Offsh Struct. 10(1):59–78. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.883957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Paik JK. 2017. Ultimate limit state-based multi-objective optimum design technology for hull structural scantlings of merchant cargo ships. Ocean Eng. 129:318–334. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitarovic S, Zanic V. 2014. Approximate approach to progressive collapse analysis of the monotonous thin-walled structures in vertical bending. Mar Struct. 39:255–286. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitarovic S, Zanic V, Andric J. 2013. Progressive collapse analyses of stiffened box-girders submitted to pure bending. Brodogradnja. 64(4):437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann E, Bockenhauer M, Fricke W, Hansen H-J. 1997. Structural design aspects of bulk carriers. Trans Built Environ. 24:25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ma M, Hughes OF. 2011. Permanent means of access structural design using multi-objective optimization. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2011-49259, June 19–24, Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Ma M, Paik J, McNatt T. 2016. Hierarchically decomposed multi-level optimization for ship structural design. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2016-54452, June 19–24, 2016, Busan.
   Google Scholar
• MAESTRO Version 11.0. 2014. Program Documentation, Advanced Marine Technology Center, DRS Technologies Inc. (www.maestromarine.com).
   Google Scholar
• OCTOPUS. 2012. Octopus-designer and Octopus-analyser manuals. Faculty of mechanical engineering and naval architecture. Zagreb: University of Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim DK, Kim MS. 2009. Ultimate strength performance of Suezmax tanker structures: pre-CSR versus CSR designs. Int J Maritime Eng. 151(Part A2):39–58. doi: 10.3940/rina.ijme.2009.a2.154
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim DK, Park DH, Kim HB, Mansour AE, Caldwell JB. 2013. Modified Paik-Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(3–4):245–260. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.676247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Mansour AE. 1995. A simple formulation for predicting the ultimate strength of ships. J Mar Sci Technol. 1(1):52–62. doi: 10.1007/BF01240013
   Google Scholar
• Prebeg P, Zanic V, Vazic B. 2014. Application of a surrogate modeling to the ship structural design. Ocean Eng. 84:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigo P, Ehlers S, Zanic V, Andric J. 2010. Design of innovative ship concepts using an integrated decision support system for ship production and operation. Brodogradnja. 61(4):367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanoff J, Remes H, Varsta P, Jelovica J, Klanac A, Niemela A, Bralic S, Naar H. 2013. Hull-superstructure interaction in optimized passenger ships. Ships Offsh Struct. 8:612–620. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.675196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone K, McNatt T. 2017. Ship hull structural scantling optimization. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Marine Structures-MARSTRUCT 2017. Lisbon. May 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Urm HS, Shin JG. 2004. Bulk carriers. In: Thomas Lamb and International Group of Authorities, editors. Chapter 33 in Ship design and construction. Jersey City (NJ): The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Zanic V. 2013. Methods and concepts for the multi-criteria synthesis of ship structures. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(3–4):225–244. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.785728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Hadzic N. 2015. Optimization procedure for LNG carrier structural design. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M-J Eng Maritime Environ. 229(1):14–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Prebeg P. 2009. Design environment for structural design: application to modern multi-deck ships. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M-J Eng Maritime Environ. 223(M1):105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Prebeg P. 2013. Design synthesis of complex ship structures. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(3–4):383–403. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.783455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar