Comparative study of wind resistance of a 2D stack of featured ocean containers and a 3D forty feet unit

References

• Adams T, Grant C, Watson H. 2012. A simple algorithm to relate measured surface roughness to equivalent sand-grain roughness. Intl J Mech Eng Mechatron. 1(1):66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, IMV. 2012a. Wind forces on container ships. Mercator.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, IMV. 2012b. Wind-tunnel investigation of wind loads on a post-panamax container ship as a function of the container configuration on deck. Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2017. fleetmon. [accessed 2017 Feb 09] http://www.fleetmon.com/.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS. 2009. CFX solver theory guide. Release 12.1 ed. s.l.
   Google Scholar
• Bardina JE, Huang PG, Coakley TJ. 1997. Turbulence modeling validation testing and developement. NASA Technical Memorandum 110446.
   Google Scholar
• Coles S. 2001. An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. 1st ed. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Container Home Plans. 2018. Container home plans. [accessed 2018 Jan 06]. https://www.containerhomeplans.org/2017/01/shipping-container-home-rust-and-corrosion-treatment/
   Google Scholar
• Demirel YK, Turan O, Incecik A. 2017. Predicting the effect of biofouling on ship resistance using CFD. Appl Ocean Res. 62:100–118. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons B, Parry T. 2011. Fitz’s Atlas 2 of coating defects. UK: MPI Group.
   Google Scholar
• Haque N. 2016. Investigation of edge fairing shaping effects on aerodynamic response of long-span bridge deck by unsteady RANS. Arch Civil Mech Eng. 16(2016):888–900. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2016.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Hassan K, White MF, Ciortan C. 2012. Effect of container stack arrangement on the power optimization of a container ship. J Ship Product Design. 28(1):10–19. doi: 10.5957/JSPD.28.1.110014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidarian A. 2018. Numerical analysis of the Effects of Riblets on drag Reduction of a flat plate. J Appl Fluid Mech. 11(3):679–688. doi: 10.29252/jafm.11.03.28344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, H. Hu. 2011. Fluid mechanics ( Pijush Kundu Ira Cohen David Dowling With a chapter on Computational Fluid Dynamic with Howard, H. Hu). 5th ed. Orlando (FL): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 1972. International Convention for Safe containers, CSC 2014 edition. International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 1999. ISO 830: Freight containers – Terminology. International Standardization Organization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2017. ISO 8502-3: Preparation of steel substrates before application of paints and related products — tests for the assessment of surface cleanliness — part 3: Assessment of dust on steel surfaces prepared for painting (pressure-sensitive tape method). International Standardization Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen WD, Blocken B, van Wijhe HJ. 2017. CFD simulations of wind loads on a container ship: validation and impact of geometrical simplifications. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. Volume. 166:106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Measure. 30:607–610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majidian H, Azarsina F. 2018. Aerodynamic simulation of a container ship to evaluate cargo configuration effect on frontal wind loads. China Ocean Eng. 32:196–205. doi: 10.1007/s13344-018-0021-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majidian H, Azarsina F. 2018. CFD simulation of a distorted and roughened ocean container to investigate its aerodynamic features. Third International Naval Architecture & Maritime Symposium, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Minsaas K, Steen S. 2008. Ship resistance: proceedings and lecture notes. Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Molland AF, Turnock SR, Hudson DA. 2011. Ship resistance and propulsion: practical estimation of ship propulsive power. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moonesun M. 2010. Handbook of naval architect and marine engineering. Esfahan: Kannon Pajohesh Publication. in Farsi.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TV, Kinugawa A, Shimizu N, Ikeda Y. 2016. Studies on air resistance reduction methods for a large container ship (part 1).
   Google Scholar
• Notteboom T, Carriou P. 2009. Fuel surcharge practices of container shipping lines: is it about cost recovery or revenue making?. The 2009 International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Rainbow Containers GmbH. 2018. Technical specification for ISO 1CC type steel dry cargo container with All CORTEN. Rainbow Containers: Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue JP, Comtois C, Slack B. 2017. The geography of transport systems. 4th ed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roe BP. 2001. Probability and statistics in experimental physics. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Salim, SM. 2009. Wall Y+ strategy for dealing with wall-bounded turbulent flows. Proceedings of the INternational Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting H, Gersten K. 2017. Boundary-layer theory. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taherkhani AR, deBoer GN, Gaskell PH, Gilkeson CA, Hewson RW, Keech A, Thompson HM, Toropov VV. 2015. Aerodynamic drag reduction of emergency response vehicles. Adv Automobile Eng. 4(2):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tator KB. 2015. ASM handbook volume 5B: protective organic coating. 1st ed. Ohio: ASM International.
   Google Scholar
• UK P&I Club. 2017. Top 25 cause of container claims: a loss prevention advice checklist for container operators. UK P&I Club.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, I, Van Nguyen T, Miyake S, Shimizu N, Ikeda Y. 2016. A study on reduction of air resistance acting on a large container ship. Hanoi.
   Google Scholar
• Webb A. 1999. Statistical pattern recognition. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White FM. 2011. Fluid mechanics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• World Shipping Council. 2018. World Shipping Council. [accessed 2018 Jan 06] http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/global-trade/top-50-world-container-ports
   Google Scholar