Parametric CFD investigation of ALS technique on reduction in drag of bulk carrier

References

• Brostow W. 2008. Drag reduction in flow: review of applications, mechanism and prediction. J Ind Eng Chem. 14(4):409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccio S. 2010. Friction drag reduction of external flows with bubble and gas injection. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 42:183–203. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport J, Hughes N, Shorten R, Pou M. 2011. Drag reduction by air release promotes fast ascent in jumping emperor penguins – a novel hypothesis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 430:171–182. doi: 10.3354/meps08868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogrul A, Arikan Y, Celik F. n.d. A numerical investigation of air lubrication effect on ship resistance.
   Google Scholar
• Drew D, Passman S. 1998. Theory of multicomponent fluids. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda K, Tokunaga J, Nobunaga T, Nakatani T, Iwasaki T. 2000. Frictional drag reduction with air lubricant over a super-water repellent surface. J Mar Sci Technol. 5:123–130. doi: 10.1007/s007730070009
   Google Scholar
• Hayder AA, Yunus R, Abdura N, Charles A. 2013. Going against the flow – a review of non-additive means of drag reduction. J Ind Eng Chem. 19(1):27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. ITTC – Recommended procedures and guidelines practical guidelines for ship CFD applications 7.5-03-02-03. ITTC. https://ittc.info/media/1357/75-03-02-03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC – Recommended Procedures. 1999. ITTC – recommended procedures- performance, propulsion 1978 ITTC performance prediction method. Int Towing Tank Conf. 7.5-02(03-01.4):1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kanai A, Miyata H. 2001. Direct numerical simulation of wall turbulent flows with microbubbles. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 35:593–615. doi: 10.1002/1097-0363(20010315)35:5<593::AID-FLD105>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanokjaruvijit K, Martinez-botas RF. 2005. Jet impingement on a dimpled surface with different crossflow schemes. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 48:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabuchi M, Kawakita C, Mizokami S, Higasa S, Kodan Y, Takano S. 2011. CFD Predictions of bubbly flow around an energy-saving ship with Mitsubishi air lubrication system. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Tech Rev. 48(1):53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Cleaver J. 1995. The persistence of drug reduction following the injection of microbubbles into a turbulent boundarylayer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 22(3):353–357. doi: 10.1016/0735-1933(95)00026-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Moin P. 2010. Direct numerical study of air layer drag reduction phenomenon over a backward-facing step. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs.
   Google Scholar
• Kodama Y, Takahashi T, Makino M, Hori T, Ueda T, Kawamura N, Shibata M, Kato H, Inoue T, Suzuki T, Toda Y. 2004. Practical application of microbubbles to ships – large scale model experiments and a new full scale experiment. National Maritime Research Institute, Toyo University, Azuma Shipping, Osaka Univ & Chugoku Marine Paints.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Fernández A, Tryggvason G. 2005. The effect of bubbles on the wall drag in a turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids. 17:95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madavan K, Deutsch S, Merkle C. 1985. Numerical investigations into the mechanisms of microbubble drag reduction. Trans ASME. 107:370–377.
   Google Scholar
• Madavan K, Deutsch S, Merkle CL. 1984. Measurements of local skin friction in a microbubble modified turbulent boundary layer. The Pennsylvania State University: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick M, Bhattacharyya R. 1973. Drag reduction of a submersible hull by electrolysis. Naval Eng J. 85:11–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-3584.1973.tb04788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle CL, Deutsch S. 1992. Drag reduction in liquid boundary layers by gas injection. Prog Astronaut Aeronaut. 123:351–412.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad A, Majid M. 2015. A review on the drag reduction methods of the ship hulls for improving the hydrodynamic performance. Int J Maritime Technol. 4:51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanarangam K, Cheung SC, Tu JY, Chen L. 2009. Numerical simulation of micro-bubble drag reduction using population balance model. Ocean Eng. 36:863–872. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriguchi Y, Kato H. 2002. Influence of microbubble diameter and distribution on frictional resistance reduction. J Mar Sci Technol. 7:79–85. doi: 10.1007/s007730200015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A, Tryggvason G. 2009. Computational methods for methods for multiphase flow. University of New Mexico, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rzehak R, Krepper E. 2013. CFD modeling of bubble-induced turbulence. Int J Multiphase Flow. 55:138–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shereena S, Vengadesan S, Idichand V. 2013. CFD study of drag reduction in axisymmetric underwater vehicles using air jets. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 7(2):193–209.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Nirali S, Saxena B. 2018. Numerical investigation of influence of micro bubble injection, distribution, void fraction and flow speed on frictional drag reduction. International Conference on Ocean Engineering -2018; IIT Madras: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijayakumar R, Saxena BK. 2018a. CFD investigation of MBDR technique on frictional drag reduction of bulk carrier. 6th National Conference on Coastal, Harbour and Ocean Engineering; Pune: Indian Society of Hydrualics. pp. 408–424.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijayakumar R, Saxena BK. 2018b. Investigation of Air Lubrication System (ALS) on drag reduction of ship. Worldwide Maritime Technology Conference; Shanghai: Shanghai Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Saxena B. 2017. An EFD and CFD based review of microbubble drag reduction (MBDR) of ship. Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China: BIT’s 6th Annual World Congress of Ocean-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Saxena B. 2017. Drag reduction of ships: innovative & effective technologies to reduce propulsion power and in turn fuel consumption. In World Shipping Forum. Madras: Institute of Marine Engineers, Chennai Division; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi SC, Vijayakumar R, Saxena B. 2018. Frictional drag reduction: review and numerical simulation of microbubble drag reduction in a channel flow. Int J Maritime Eng. 160(Part A2):121–140. 3940/rina.ijme.2018.a2.460.
   Google Scholar
• Sindagi S, Vijaykumar R, Saxena B. 2016. Frictional drag reduction: an EFD and CFD based review of mechanisms. IIT Madras: International conference on EFD and CFD – MARHY 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Skudarnov P, Lin C. 2006. Drag reduction by gas injection into turbulent boundary layer: density ratio effect. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 27:436–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C-S, He S-L, Zhu D-X, Gu M. n.d. Numerical simulation of microbubble flow around an axisymmetric body. Conference of global chinese scholars on hydrodynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Maxey M, Karniadakis G. 2002. Numerical simulation of turbulent drag reduction using micro-bubbles. J Fluid Mech. 468:271–281. doi: 10.1017/S0022112002001659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiaki K, Akira K, Takahito T, Hideki K. 2000. Experimental study on microbubbles and their applicability to ships for skin friction reduction. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 21:582–588. doi: 10.1016/S0142-727X(00)00048-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiaki K, Akira K, Takahito T, Shigeki N, Takafumi K. 2002. Drag reduction of ships by microbubbles. The University of Tokyo: National Maritime Research Institute of Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Yuehao L, Wang L, Green L, Song K, Wang L, Smith R. 2015. Advances of drag-reducing surface technologies in turbulence based on boundary layer control. J Hydrodyn. 27(4):473–487. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(15)60507-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zverkhovskyi O, Kerkvlietb M, Lampeb A, Vazb G, Terwisga TV. 2015. MARIN Academy, Wageningen, NL; MARIN, Wageningen, NL Delft University of Technology, NL; DAMEN Shipyards Gorinchem, NL.
   Google Scholar