Manoeuvring prediction of a container ship using the numerical PMM test and experimental validation using the free running model test

References

• Abkowitz MA. 1964. Testing techniques used for the measurement of hydrodynamic derivatives. Lecture on ship hydrodynamics-steering and manoeuvrability, 53-62.
   Google Scholar
• Balagopalan A, Tiwari K, Krishnankutty P. 2017. Horizontal planar motion mechanism (HPMM) incorporated to the existing towing carriage for ship manoeuvring studies. 5th International Conference on Ships and Offshore Technology; Dec 7–8; IIT Kharagpur, India.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee N, Rao CS, Raju MSP, Hughes P. 2006. Determination of manoeuvrability of ship model using large amplitude horizontal planar motion mechanism. Proceedings of International Conference in Marine Hydrodynamics; Jan 5–7; NSTL, Visakhapatnam, p. 529–545.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman W, Hujjsman RHM, Keuning PJ. 1984. Calculation methods of hydrodynamic coefficients of ships in shallow water. Int Ship Build Prog. 31(357):209–223. doi: 10.3233/ISP-1984-3136003
   Google Scholar
• Carrica P, Ismail MF, Hyman M, Bhushan S, Stern F. 2013. Turning and zig-zag maneuvers of surface combatant using URANS approach with dynamic overset grids. J Mar Sci Technol. 18:166–181. doi: 10.1007/s00773-012-0196-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertler M. 1959. The DTMB Planar Motion Mechanism System. Symposium of Towing Tank Facilities, Zagreb, Yugoslavia.
   Google Scholar
• Imlay FH. 1961. The complete expressions for added mass of a rigid body moving in an ideal fluid. Washington, DC: David Taylor Model Basin. Technical Report DTMB 1528.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis RB, Mikelis NE, Price WG, Waite JB. 1981. Comparison of restricted open water ship manoeuvring derivatives evaluated by finite element and boundary integral methods. Int Ship Build Prog. 28(320):90–93. doi: 10.3233/ISP-1981-2832003
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2011. Practical guidelines for ship CFD application. ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines 7.5-03-02-03. Proceedings of 26th International Towing Tank Conference; Aug 28–Sep 3; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y., Zou L., Zou Z., Guo H. 2018. Predictions of ship maneuverability based on virtual captive model tests. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 12(1):334–353. doi:10.1080/19942060.2018.1439773.
   Google Scholar
• Maimun A, Priyanto A, Muhammad AH, Scully CC, Awal ZI. 2011. Manoeuvring prediction of pusher barge in deep and shallow water. Ocean Eng. 38:1291–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter F. R. 1993. Zonal Two Equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper. 93-2906.
   Google Scholar
• Mikelis NE. 1982. Data for the evaluation of the acceleration coefficients for tankers maneuvering in shallow and deep waters. Int Ship Build Prog. 29(340):334–342. doi: 10.3233/ISP-1982-2934003
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka K, Miyazaki H, Nimura T, Ueno M, Hino T, Kodama Y. 2000. Calculation of hydrodynamic forces acting on a ship in manoeuvring motion. Proceedings of MARSIM 2000, International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvring; Orlando, FL, USA, p. 307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa A, Koyama T, Kijima K. 1997. MMG report-I, on the mathematical model of ship manoeuvring. Bull Soc Nav Archit Jpn. 575:22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ohmori T. 1998. Finite-volume simulation of flows about a ship in maneuvering motion. J Mar Sci Technol. 3:82–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02492563
   Google Scholar
• Shenoi R., Krishnankutty P., Panneer Selvam R. 2014. Study of manoeuvrability of container ship by static and dynamic simulations using a RANSE-based solver. J Ships Offshore Struct. 11(3):316–334. doi:10.1080/17445302.2014.987439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Klimt C, Larsen NL, Stern F. 2012. Maneuvering predictions in the early design phase using CFD generated PMM data. Proceedings of 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics; Aug 26–31; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Vantorre M, Eloot K. 1997. Requirements for standard harmonic captive manoeuvring tests. Proceedings of 4th IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft: MCMC’97; Sep 10–12; Brijuni, Croatia, p. 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Xing-Kaeding Y, Jensen AG. 2006. Simulation of ship motions during maneuvers. Ship Technol Res Schiffstechnick. 53(4):159–182. doi: 10.1179/str.2006.53.4.003
   Google Scholar