A study on the added resistance of a catamaran advancing in waves considering variations of both operating and geometric parameters

References

• Ageno E, Begovic E, Bruzzone D, Galli A, Gualeni P. 2015. A boundary element method for motions and added resistance of ships in waves. Trans FAMENA. 39(2):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apollonio CM, Vernengo G, Bonfiglio L, Brizzolara S, Bruzzone D. 2017. On the roll motion prediction of high speed multi-hull vessels. The 27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers; June 25-30, 2017; San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong T, Schmieman A. 2005. On the added resistance of catamaran in waves. International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, St. Petersburg, Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram V. 1996. A 3-d rankine panel method to compute added resistance in ships. Institut fur Shiffbau der Universitat Hamburg. (Bericht Nr. 566).
   Google Scholar
• Bouscasse B, Broglia R, Stern F. 2013. Experimental investigation of a fast catamaran in head waves. Ocean Eng. 72:318–330. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brizzolara S, Vernengo G, Bonfiglio L, Bruzzone D. 2015. Comparative performance of optimum high speed swath and semi-swath in calm water and in waves. Trans – Soc Naval Architects Mar Eng. 123:273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzone D. 1994. Numerical evaluation of the steady free surface waves. Proceedings of CFD Workshop Tokyo. Vol. 94. Tokyo, Japan; p. 126–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzone D. 2003. Application of a rankine source method to the evaluation of motions of high speed marine vehicles. Proceeding of the 8th International Marine Design Conference, Athens. Vol. 2. p. 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzone D, Gironi C, Grasso A. 2011. Nonlinear effects on motions and loads using an iterative time-frequency solver. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 3(1):20–26. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruzzone D, Grasso A, Zotti I. 2008. Nonlinear seakeeping analysis of catamarans with central bulb. International Conference on High Performance Marine Vehicles; Sep 18th-19th 2008; Naples, Italy. p. 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzone D, Gualeni P, Cassella P, Zotti I. 2004. Motions and added resistance of multihull marine vehicles at high speed: numerical and experimental results. Proc Hydrodynamics VI–Theory and Applications; Perth: AA Balkema Publishers; p. 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Noack RW, Stern F. 2007. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Comput Fluids. 36(9):1415–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione T, Stern F, Bova S, Kandasamy M. 2011. Numerical investigation of the seakeeping behaviour of a catamaran advancing in regular head waves. Ocean Eng. 38(16):1806–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione T, Stern F, Kandasamy M, Bova S. 2009. Unsteady rans simulations for a catamaran advancing in regular waves. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Fast and Sea Transportation, FAST. Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng B. 1989. Computations of 3d transom stern flows. 5th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics. Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson C. 1977. A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Doctors LJ, Macfarlane GJ, Young R. 2007. A study of transom-stern ventilation. Int Shipbuilding Prog. 54(2–3):145–163.
   Google Scholar
• El-Moctar O, Sprenger F, Schellin T, Papanikolaou A. 2016. Numerical and experimental investigations of ship maneuvers in waves. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 1980. Prediction of resistance and propulsion of a ship in a seaway. Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Tokyo, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsma J, Beukelman W. 1972. Analysis of the resistance increase in waves of a fast cargo ship. Int Shipbuilding Prog. 19(217):285–293. doi: 10.3233/ISP-1972-1921701
   Google Scholar
• Grasso A, Villa D, Brizzolara S, Bruzzone D. 2010. Nonlinear motions in head waves with a rans and a potential code. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 22(5):172–177. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(09)60189-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualeni P, Colotto G, Guadagna G, D'Amico M. 2012. Ship added resistance evaluation in the perspective of decision making for energy saving. NAV 2012 17th International Conference on Ships and Shipping Research, Oct 17–19, 2012, Naples, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Havelock T. 1942. The drifting force on a ship among waves. Lond, Edinburgh, Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 33(221):467–475. doi: 10.1080/14786444208521213
   Google Scholar
• He W, Diez M, Zou Z, Campana EF, Stern F. 2013. Urans study of delft catamaran total/added resistance, motions and slamming loads in head sea including irregular wave and uncertainty quantification for variable regular wave and geometry. Ocean Eng. 74:189–217. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hizir O, Kim M, Turan O, Day A, Incecik A, Lee Y. 2019. Numerical studies on non-linearity of added resistance and ship motions of kvlcc2 in short and long waves. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 11(1):143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2018.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan JC, Huang TT. 2007. Surface ship total resistance prediction based on a nonlinear free surface potential flow solver and a reynolds-averaged navier-stokes viscous correction. J Ship Res. 51(1):47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMO. 2011. Amendments to the annex of the protocol of 1997 to amend the international convention for the prevention of pollution from ships, 1973, as modified by the protocol of 1978 relating thereto.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2012. Resolution: 2012a. mepc.1 / circ.796: Interim guidelines for the calculation of the coefficient fw for decrease of ship speed in representative sea condition for trial use.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2014. Resolution: 245 (66) 2014 guidelines on the method of calculation of the attained energy efficiency design index (eedi) for new ships.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. Guidelines: seakeeping experiments. ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Procedure 75-02, 07-021:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Joncquez SAG, Bingham H, Andersen P, Kring D. 2008. Validation of added resistance computations by a potential flow boundary element method. Proceedings of the 27th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, S. Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Joncquez S, Simonsen CD, Otzen JF. 2012. Computational evaluation of the added resistance in oblique seas. The 27th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Copenhagen, Denmark. p. 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jupp M, Sime R, Dudson E. 2014. Xss-a next generation windfarm support vessel. RINA Conference: Design & Operation of Wind Farm Support Vessels. London, UK; p. 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi M. 1992. Added resistance, wave-induced steady sway force and yaw moment on an advancing ship. Ship Technol Res (Schiffstechnik). 39:3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Kim Y. 2011. Numerical study on added resistance of ships by using a time-domain rankine panel method. Ocean Eng. 38(13):1357–1367. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YC, Kim KS, Kim J, Kim Y, Park IR, Jang YH. 2017. Analysis of added resistance and seakeeping responses in head sea conditions for low-speed full ships using urans approach. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 9(6):641–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CM, Park SC, Yu JW, Choi JE, Lee I. 2019. Effects of diffraction in regular head waves on added resistance and wake using cfd. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 11(2):736–749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2019.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis EV. 1989. Principles of naval architecture (second revision), volume iii-motions in waves and controllability. Jersey City, NJ: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Ley J, Sigmund S, el Moctar O. 2014. Numerical prediction of the added resistance of ships in waves. ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. San Francisco, CA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; p. V002T08A069–V002T08A069.
   Google Scholar
• Liu S, Papanikolaou A, Zaraphonitis G. 2011. Prediction of added resistance of ships in waves. Ocean Eng. 38(4):641–650. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane G, Daire N. 2011. The influence of catamaran hull form on added resistance in head seas. 11th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, Hawai, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh G. 2015. Radical access solutions for distant offshore wind farms. Renew Energy Focus. 16(4):81–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2015.09.010
   Google Scholar
• Martelli M, Vernengo G, Bruzzone D, Notti E. 2017. Holistic modeling of the global propulsion energy index in waves for small craft. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 27(04):442–447. doi: 10.17736/ijope.2017.mk54
   Google Scholar
• Maruo H. 1960. The drift on a body floating in waves. J Ship Res. 4(3):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Newman J. 1967. The drift force and moment on ships in waves. J Ship Res. 11(1):51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie T, Tuck E. 1969. A rational strip theory of ship motions: part I. The University of Michigan, Report n 013 Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Orlandi A, Bruzzone D. 2012. Numerical weather and wave prediction models for weather routing, operation planning and ship design: The relevance of multimodal wave spectra. In: Sustainable maritime transportation and exploitation of sea resources. CRC Press/Balkema – Taylor & Francis Group. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean, IMAM 2011. Vol. 2. p. 817–826.
   Google Scholar
• Orlandi A, Pasi F, Capecchi V, Coraddu A, Villa D. 2015. Powering and seakeeping forecasting for energy efficiency: assessment of the fuel savings potential for weather routing by in-service data and ensemble prediction techniques. In: Orlandi A, Pasi F, Capecchi V, editors. Towards green marine technology and transport. Pula: CRC Press; p. 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Orlanski I. 1976. A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows. J Comput Phys. 21(3):251–269. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(76)90023-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A, Zaraphonitis G. 1987. On an improved method for the evaluation of second-order motions and loads on 3d floating bodies in waves. J Schiffstechnik-Ship Technol Res. 34:170–211.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A, Zaraphonitis G, Bitner-Gregersen E, Shigunov V, El Moctar O, Soares CG, Reddy D, Sprenger F. 2016. Energy efficient safe ship operation (shopera). Transport Res Procedia. 14:820–829. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.030
   Google Scholar
• Pinkster JA. 1980. Low frequency second order wave exciting forces on floating structures [PhD thesis]. TU Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Prpić-Oršić J, Faltinsen OM. 2012. Estimation of ship speed loss and associated co2 emissions in a seaway. Ocean Eng. 44:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadat-Hosseini H, Wu PC, Carrica PM, Kim H, Toda Y, Stern F. 2013. CFD verification and validation of added resistance and motions of kvlcc2 with fixed and free surge in short and long head waves. Ocean Eng. 59:240–273. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvesen N. 1974. Second-order steady-state forces and moments on surface ships in oblique regular waves. Proc. Int. Symp. on Dynamics of Marine Vehicles, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Shigunov V, Papanikolaou A. 2015. Criteria for minimum powering and maneuverability in adverse weather conditions. Ship Technol Res. 62(3):140–147. doi: 10.1080/09377255.2015.1104090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skejic R, Faltinsen OM. 2008. A unified seakeeping and maneuvering analysis of ships in regular waves. J Mar Sci Technol. 13(4):371–394. doi: 10.1007/s00773-008-0025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söding H, Shigunov V, Schellin TE, el Moctar O. 2014. A rankine panel method for added resistance of ships in waves. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 136(3):031601. doi: 10.1115/1.4026847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom-Tejsen J, Yeh HY, Moran DD. 1973. Added resistance in waves. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Tezdogan T, Demirel YK, Kellett P, Khorasanchi M, Incecik A, Turan O. 2015. Full-scale unsteady rans cfd simulations of ship behaviour and performance in head seas due to slow steaming. Ocean Eng. 97:186–206. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van't Veer AP. 1998a. Behaviour of catamarans in waves [dissertation]. Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Van't Veer R. 1998b. Experimental results of motions and structural loads on the 372 catamaran model in head and oblique waves. TU Delft report. (1130).
   Google Scholar
• Vernengo G, Apollonio CM, Bruzzone D, Bonfiglio L, Brizzolara S. 2017. Hydrodynamics performance of high speed multi-hulls in waves. In: Guedes Soares, Teixeira, editors. Maritime transportation and harvesting of sea resources. International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean; 2018. London: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 493–500.
   Google Scholar
• Vernengo G, Bruzzone D. 2016. Resistance and seakeeping numerical performance analyses of a semi-small waterplane area twin hull at medium to high speeds. J Mar Sci Appl. 15(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11804-016-1343-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernengo G, Gaggero T, Rizzuto E. 2016. Simulation based design of a fleet of ships under power and capacity variations. Appl Ocean Res. 61:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernengo G, Rizzuto E. 2014. Ship synthesis model for the preliminary design of a fleet of compressed natural gas carriers. Ocean Eng. 89:189–199. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, McOwan S. 2000. Fast passenger ferries and their future. Marit Policy Manag. 27(3):231–251. doi: 10.1080/030888300411086
   Google Scholar
• Wellicome J, Temarel P, Molland A, Couser P. 1995. Experimental measurements of the seakeeping characteristics of fastdisplacement catamarans in long-crested head-seas. Southampton: University of Southampton. Ship Science Reports, 89.
   Google Scholar
• Wu CS, Zhou DC, Gao L, Miao QM. 2011. CFD computation of ship motions and added resistance for a high speed trimaran in regular head waves. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 3(1):105–110. doi: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan ZM, Incecik A, Jia L. 2014. A new radiation condition for ships travelling with very low forward speed. Ocean Eng. 88:298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccone R, Ottaviani E, Figari M, Altosole M. 2018. Ship voyage optimization for safe and energy-efficient navigation: a dynamic programming approach. Ocean Eng. 153:215–224. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar