Numerical roll damping prediction of a planing hull

References

• Begovic E, Bertorello C, Orsic JP. 2013. Roll damping coefficients assessment and comparison for round bilge and hard chine hullforms. Proceedings of the ASME 2013: 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; Jun. 9–14; Nantes; France.
   Google Scholar
• Brown PW, Klosinski WE. 1994a. Directional test of two prismatic planing hull. U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center. Report No: CG-D-11-94.
   Google Scholar
• Brown PW, Klosinski WE. 1994b. Directional test of a 30-degree deadrise prismatic planing hull. U.S. Coast Guard Research and Development Center. Report No. CG-D-26-94.
   Google Scholar
• Brown PW, Klosinski WE. 1995. Experimental determination of the added inertia and damping of planing boats in roll. USCGRDC. Report No: CG-D-03-95, January, US Coast Guard.
   Google Scholar
• CD Adapco. 2014. STAR CCM+ Users Guide Version 9.04.
   Google Scholar
• Celik I, Ghia U, Roache P, Fretias CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE. 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J. Fluids Eng.-Trans. ASME. 130:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu TC, Brucker KA, Mousaviraad SM, Ikeda CM, Lee EJ, O’shea TT, Wang Z, Stern F, Judge CQ. 2014. An assessment of computational fluid dynamics predictions of the hydrodynamics of high-speed planing craft in calm water and waves. 30th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics; Nov. 2–7; Tasmania; Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A. 2016. Coupled heave and pitch motions of planing hulls at non-zero heel angle. Appl Ocean Res. 59:286–303. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinzadeh S, Khorasanchi M, Seif MS. 2018. Investigation of planing vessels motion using nonlinear strip theory – an experimental and numerical study. Ships Offsh Struct. DOI:10.1080/ 17445302.2018.1552342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda Y, Katayama T. 2000. Roll damping prediction method for a high-speed planing craft. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Stability of ship and Ocean Vehicles; Tasmania; Australia.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2011b. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. In: Presented at the Proceedings of 26th ITTC; Hague.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. Ocean Engineering Committee, Final Report and Recommendation to the 27th ITTC. Proceedings of 27th ITTC; Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Judge CQ. 2010. Frequency dependence of hydrodynamic coefficient in roll. The 29th American Towing Tank Conference; Annapolis; MD; USA.
   Google Scholar
• Judge CQ, Beaver W. 2013. Development of a forced roll mechanism for planing hull models. Nav Eng J. 125:69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama T, Adachi T, Sawae T. 2018. Roll damping estimation for small planing craft. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Stability of ships and Ocean Vehicles; Sep.16-21; Kobe; Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Mousaviraad SM, Wang Z, Stern F. 2015. URANS studies of hydrodynamic performance and slamming loads on high-speed planing hulls in calm water and waves for deep and shallow conditions. Appl Ocean Res. 51:222–240. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson LF. 1910. The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems involving differential equations, with an application to the stresses in a Masonry dam. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A. 210:307–357.
   Google Scholar
• Roache PJ. 1998. Verification of codes and calculations. AIAA J. 36(5):696–702. doi: 10.2514/2.457
   Google Scholar
• Salui KB, Shigunov V, Vassalos D. 2004. A RANS based method for the estimation of ship roll damping with forward speed. Proceedings of OMAE04 23rd International Conference on offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering; Jun. 20–25; Vancouver; Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky D. 1964. Hydrodynamics design of planing hulls. Marin Technol. 1(1):71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky D, Prowse RE, Lueders DH. 1958. High-speed hydrodynamic characteristics of a flat plate and a 20°dead-rise surface in unsymmetrical planing condition. NACA Technical Note No. 4187.
   Google Scholar
• Sezen S, Dogrul A, Delen C, Bal S. 2018. Investigation of self-propulsion of DARPA suboff by RANS method. Ocean Eng. 150:258–271. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern F, Wilson RW, Shao J. 2006. Quantitative V&V of CFD simulations and certification of CFD codes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 50:1335–1355. doi: 10.1002/fld.1090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Faltinsen OM. 2011. Dynamic motions of planing vessels in head seas. J Mar Sci Technol. 16(2):168–180. doi: 10.1007/s00773-011-0123-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli S, Ghadimi P, Dashtimanesh A, Sahoo P. 2015. Determination of hydrodynamic coefficients in roll motion of high-speed planing hulls. Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation; Washington DC; USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tezdogan T, Incecik A, Turan O. 2016. Full-scale unsteady RANS simulations of vertical ship motions in shallow water. Ocean Eng. 123:131–145. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız B, Çakıcı F, Katayama T, Yılmaz H. 2016a. URANS prediction of roll damping for a ship hull section at shallow draft. J Mar Sci Technol. 21(1):48–56. doi: 10.1007/s00773-015-0331-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldız B, Yurtseven A, Katayama T. 2016b. Effect of vortex shedding and free surface interaction on roll damping due to large amplitude roll motion. Proceedings of the 15th International Ship Stability Workshop; Jun. 13–15; Stockholm; Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Zarnick E. 1978. A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planing boat in regular waves. David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, DTNSRDC 78/032.
   Google Scholar