Dynamic reliability analysis for residual life assessment of corroded subsea pipelines

References

• Baraldi P, Podofillini L, Mkrtchyan L, Zio E, Dang VN. 2015. Comparing the treatment of uncertainty in Bayesian networks and fuzzy expert systems used for a human reliability analysis application. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 138:176–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain J. 2001. Planning improvements in natural resources management: guidelines for using Bayesian networks to support the planning and management of development programmes in the water sector and beyond. Oxon: The Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny I, Mikulova D, Sis J. 2017. Examples of actual defects in high pressure pipelines and probabilistic assessment of residual life for different types of pipeline steels. Procedia Struct Integrity. 7:431–437. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.109
   Google Scholar
• Dongshan Z. 2014. Residual strength calculation & residual life prediction of general corrosion pipeline. Procedia Eng. 94:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.045
   Google Scholar
• Fenton N, Neil M, Lagnado D, Marsh W, Yet B, Constantinou A. 2016. How to model mutually exclusive events based on independent causal pathways in Bayesian network models. Knowl Based Syst. 113:39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs J. 2014. Reliable corrosion inhibition in the oil and gas industry. Prepared by the Health and Safety Laboratory for the Health and Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Chen G, Zhu H. 2016. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Prot. 103:163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2016.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkrtchyan L, Podofillini L, Dang VN. 2016. Methods for building conditional probability tables of Bayesian Belief networks from limited judgment: an evaluation for Human reliability application. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 151:93–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd MH, Kim DK, Kim DW, Paik JK. 2014. A time-variant corrosion wastage model for subsea gas pipelines. Ships Offsh Struct. 9:161–176. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.770724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy KP. 2002. Dynamic Bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning [dissertation]. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi M. 2011. Service life estimation and extension of civil engineering structures. Woodhead Publishing in Materials. 262–289.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim DK. 2012. Advanced method for the development of an empirical model to predict time-dependent corrosion wastage. Corros Sci. 63:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesinis K, Tee KF. 2018. Bayesian analysis of small probability incidents for corroding energy pipelines. Eng Struct. 165:264–277. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifandi I. 2017. 3in GL ESA-ESTA Pipeline: 2017 Residual Life Assessment. Risk-based asset management. Document number: THU-PL-STC-0991-WO-045-0127.
   Google Scholar
• Røed W, Mosleh A, Vinnem JE, Aven T. 2009. On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 94:445–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabarchin O, Tesfamariam S. 2016. Internal corrosion hazard assessment of oil & gas pipelines using Bayesian belief network model. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 40:479–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiee A, Animah I. 2017. Life extension decision making of safety critical systems: an overview. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 47:174–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtoyko I, Toribio J, Kharin V, Hredil M. 2019. Prediction of the residual lifetime of gas pipelines considering the effect of soil corrosion and material degradation. Procedia Struct Integrity. 16:148–152. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.07.034
   Google Scholar
• Tong X, Fang W, Yuan S, Ma J, Bai Y. 2018. Application of Bayesian approach to the assessment of mine gas explosion. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 54:238–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YF, Qin T, Li B, Sun XF, Li YL. 2017. Fire probability prediction of offshore platform based on dynamic Bayesian network. Ocean Eng. 145:112–123. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisse B, Bedford T, Quigley J. 2008. Expert judgement combination using moment methods. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 93:675–686. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Zhou R, Xu S, Wu Z. 2017. Probabilistic analysis of natural gas pipeline network accident based on Bayesian network. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 46:126–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei E, Azadeh A, Khakzad N, Aliabadi MM, Mohammadfam I. 2017. Dynamic safety assessment of natural gas stations using Bayesian network. J Hazard Mater. 321:830–840. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.09.074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar