Methodology for collision-frequency analysis of wind-turbine installation vessels

References

• ABS. 2013. Guidance notes on accidental load analysis and design for offshore structures. Texas (USA): American Bureau of Shipping.
   Google Scholar
• Bela A, Le Sourne H, Buldgen L, Rigo P. 2017. Ship collision analysis on offshore wind turbine monopile foundations. Mar Struct. 51:220–241. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buldgen L, Le Sourne H, Besnard N, Rigo P. 2012. Extension of the super-elements method to the analysis of oblique collision between two ships. Mar Struct. 29:22–57. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buldgen L, Le Sourne H, Pire T. 2014. Extension of the super-elements methods to the analysis of a jacket impacted by a ship. Mar Struct. 38:44–71. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEFOR. 2012. The CEFOR annual report. Oslo (Norway): Nordic Association of Marine Insurers.
   Google Scholar
• Czujko J. 2001. Design of offshore facilities to resist gas explosion hazard: engineering handbook. Oslo (Norway): CorrOcean ASA.
   Google Scholar
• Dai L, Ehlers S, Rausand M, Utne IB. 2013. Risk of collision between service vessels and offshore wind turbines. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 109:18–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers S, Tabri K, Romanoff J, Varsta P. 2010. Numerical and experimental investigation on the collision resistance of the X-core structure. Ships Offsh Struct. 7(1):21–29. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2010.532603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furner O, Amdahl J. 1980. Computer simulation study of offshore collisions and analysis of ship-platform impacts. Appl Ocean Res. 2:119–127. doi: 10.1016/0141-1187(80)90004-8
   Google Scholar
• Geijerstam K, Sevensson H. 2008. Ship collision risk: an identification and evaluation of important factors in collision with offshore installations [master’s thesis]. Lund (Sweden): Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Haris S, Amdahl J. 2012. Crushing resistance of a cruciform and its application to ship collision and grounding. Ships Offsh Struct. 7(2):185–195. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2010.536392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong L, Amdahl J. 2008. Plastic mechanism analysis of the resistance of ship longitudinal girders in grounding and collision. Ships Offsh Struct. 3(3):159–171. doi: 10.1080/17445300802263849
   Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Lee J, Paik JK, Seo JK, Shin WH, Park JS. 2016. A study on fire design accidental loads for aluminum safety helidecks. Int J Nav Arch Ocean Eng. 8:519–529. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Sohn JM, Paik JK. 2017. An advanced procedure for the quantitative risk assessment of offshore installations in explosions. International J Mar Eng. 159(A2):123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YS, Youssef S, Ince S, Kim SJ, Seo JK, Kim BJ, Ha YC, Paik JK. 2015. Environmental consequences associated with collisions involving double hull oil tanker. Ships Offsh Struct. 10(5):479–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed A. 2012. Offshore structures: design, construction and maintenance. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Moulas D, Shafiee M, Mehmanparast A. 2017. Damage analysis of ship collisions with offshore wind turbine foundations. Ocean Eng. 143:149–162. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujeeb-Ahmed MP, Paik JK. 2019. A probabilistic approach to determine design loads for collision between an offshore supply vessel and offshore installations. Ocean Eng. 173:285–374. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OGP, 2010. Ship/installation collision. London (UK): OGP Risk Assessment Data Directory, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Report No. 434-16.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Czujko J. 2012. Engineering and design disciplines associated with hydrocarbon and fire risks in offshore oil and gas facilities. Trans Soc Nav Arch Mar Eng. 120:1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Czujko J, Kim BJ, Seo JK, Ha YC, Janiszewski P, Musail B, 2011. Quantitative assessment of hydrocarbon explosion and fire risks in offshore installations, Mar Struct, 24(2): 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim SJ, Ko YG, Youssef SAM. 2017. Collision risk assessment of a VLCC class tanker. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Maritime Convention (SMC 2017), Oct 23–28; Texas (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Seo JK. 2007. A method for progressive structural crashworthiness analysis under collision and grounding. Thin-Walled Struct. 45(1):15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SI, Kim SK, Kim SJ, Paik JK. 2020. A preliminary risk assessment on the development of a small-scaled floating power plant. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 142:011608. (9 pages). doi: 10.1115/1.4044726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen TP, Zhang S. 2000a. Absorbed energy in ship collisions and groundings revising Minorsky’s empirical method. J Ship Res. 44(2):140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen TP, Zhang S. 2000b. Effect of ship structure and size on grounding and collision damage distributions. Ocean Eng. 27(11):1161–1179. doi: 10.1016/S0029-8018(99)00043-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAFETEC. 1997. The effectiveness of collision control and avoidance systems. Trondheim (Norway): SAFETEC. Report No. DST-96-CR-052-02.
   Google Scholar
• Seo JK, Kim DC, Ha YC, Kim BJ, Paik JK. 2013. A methodology for determining efficient gas detector locations on offshore installations. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(5):524–535. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.713219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo JK, Lee SE, Park JS. 2017. A method for determining fire accidental loads and its application to thermal response analysis for optimal design of offshore thin-walled structures. Fire Saf J. 92:107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spouge JR. 1999. A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations. Oslo, Norway: DNV Technica, Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Uraz E. 2011. Offshore wind turbine transportation and installation analyses: planning optimal marine operations for offshore wind project [master’s thesis]. Sweden: Department of Wind Energy, Gotland University.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE. 2007. Offshore risk assessment – principles, modelling and application of QRA studies. Stavanger (Norway): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ye KQ. 1998. Orthogonal column Latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments. J Am Stat Assoc. 93(444):121–128. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef SAM, Faisal M, Seo JK, Kim BJ, Ha YC, Kim DK, Paik JK, Cheng F, Kim MS. 2016. Assessing the risk of ship hull collapse due to collision. Ships Offsh Struct. 11(4):335–350. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.993110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef SAM, Paik JK. 2018. Hazard identification and scenario selection of ship grounding accidents. Ocean Eng. 153:242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Amdahl J. 2016. Full six degrees of freedom coupled dynamic simulation of ship collision and grounding accidents. Mar Struct. 47:1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Amdahl J, Kristiansen D, Bore PT. 2019. Numerical analysis of local and global responses of an offshore fish farm subjected to ship impact. Ocean Eng. 194:106653. (17 pages). doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar