Experimental and numerical investigation on the scaled model of lashing bridge coupled with hull structure and container stack

References

• Acanfora M, Montewka J, Hinz T, Matusiak J. 2017a. On the estimation of the design loads on container stacks due to excessive acceleration in adverse weather conditions. Mar Struct. 53:105–123. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acanfora M, Montewka J, Hinz T, Matusiak J. 2017b. Towards realistic estimation of ship excessive motions in heavy weather. A case study of a containership in the Pacific Ocean. Ocean Eng. 138:140–150. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar De Souza V, Kirkayak L, Suzuki K, Ando H, Sueoka H. 2012. Experimental and numerical analysis of container stack dynamics using a scaled model test. Ocean Eng. 39:24–42. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar De Souza V, Kirkayak L, Watanabe I, Suzuki K, Ando H, Sueoka H, Darama H. 2013. Experimental and numerical analysis of container multiple stacks dynamics using a scaled model. Ocean Eng. 74:218–232. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocco E, Moro L, Biot M. 2015. A simplified FE model for the non-linear analysis of container stacks subject to inertial loads due to ship motions. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Marine structures (MARSTRUC T2015); Southampton, UK. pp. 331–339.
   Google Scholar
• Bulian G, Moro L, Brocco E, Bresciani F, Biot M, Francescutto A. 2015. Using time domain nonlinear ship motion simulations to assess safety of people and cargo onboard a container vessel. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the International maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM 2015)-Towards Green Marine technology and Transport; Pula, pp. 99−110.
   Google Scholar
• Bursi O, Wagg D. 2009. Modern Testing Techniques for Structural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• China Classification Society (CCS). 2015. Rules and Regulations for the construction and classification of Sea-going steel ships. Beijing: China Communications Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cho U, Dutson AJ, Wood KL, Crawford RH. 2005. An advanced method to correlate scale models with distorted configurations. J Mech Design. 127:78–85. doi: 10.1115/1.1825044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho CP, Baptista AJ, Dias Rodrigues J. 2016. Reduced scale models based on similitude theory: a review up to 2015. Eng Struct. 119:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSC. 1996. International convention for safe containers, 4th ed. London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• CSS Code. 2011. Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing, IMO Publication (IMO-292E) (2003).
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2011. Classification notes No. 32.2—Container securing—July 2011, Det Norske Veritas AS.
   Google Scholar
• France W, Levadou M, Treakle TW, Paulling JR, Michel RK, Moore C. 2003. An investigation of head-sea parametric rolling and its influence on container lashing systems. Mar Technol. 40:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gang X, Wang D, Su X. 2010. A new similitude analysis method for a scale model test. Key Eng Mater. 439-440:704–709. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.439-440.704
   Google Scholar
• Giriunas K, Sezen H, Dupaix RB. 2012. Evaluation, modeling, and analysis of shipping container-building structures. Eng Struct. 43:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GL. 2012. Stowage and lashing of containers. In: Rules for classification and construction. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd SE.
   Google Scholar
• Hirdaris SE, Lee Y, Mortola G, Incecik A, Turan O, Hong SY, Kim BW, Kim KH, Bennett S, Miao SH, Temarel P. 2016. The influence of nonlinearities on the symmetric hydrodynamic response of a 10,000 TEU container ship. Ocean Eng. 111:166–178. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMO. 2014. IMO Revised Guidelines for the Preparation of the Cargo Securing Manual. MSC.1/Circ.1353 IMO, London.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC 104. 1990. ISO 1496-1:1990 series 1 freight containers-specification and testing – part 1: General cargo containers for general purposes. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC 104. 1995. ISO 668:1995 series 1 freight containers-classification, dimensions and ratings. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC 104. 1997. ISO 3874:1997 series 1 freight containers-handling and securing. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC 104. 1999. ISO 830:1999 freight containers-vocabulary. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkayak L, Aguiar VS, Suzuki K, Ando H, Sueoka H. 2011. On the vibrational characteristics of a two-tier scaled container stack. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 16(3):354–365. doi: 10.1007/s00773-011-0129-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkayak L, Suzuki K. 2008. Numerical analysis of container stacks dynamics. Proceedings of Third Paames and AMEC. 2008(3):205–208.
   Google Scholar
• Krata P. 2015. Assessment of variations of ship’s deck elevation due to containers loading in various locations on board. In: Weintrit A, Neumann T, editors. Safety of marine transport marine navigation and safety of sea transportation. Gdynia, Poland: CRC Press, Taylor&Francis Group; p. 241–248.
   Google Scholar
• Krata P, Szpytko J, Weintrit A. 2013. Modelling of ship’s heeling and rolling for the purpose of Gantry control improvement in the course of cargo handling operations in sea ports. Solid State Phenom. 198:539–546. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.198.539
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang D. 2018a. Multi-objective optimisation of a container ship lashing bridge using knowledge-based engineering. Ships Offshore Struc. 14(1):35–52. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1472520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang D. 2018b. Integrated knowledge-based system for containership lashing bridge optimization design. 13th international Marine design conference (IMDC 2018); Helsinki, Finland. p.429–438.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang D. 2019a. Knowledge-Based engineering-based method for containership lashing bridge optimization design and structural improvement with functionally graded thickness plates. P I Mech Eng M-J Eng. 233(3):760–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang D, Liu J. 2019b. Numerical simulation of container stacks dynamics under typical motion excitation. ASME 38th international conference on Ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering (OMAE); Glasgow, Scotlad.
   Google Scholar
• Lin YH, Fang MC, Yeung RW. 2013. The optimization of ship weather-routing algorithm based on the composite influence of multi-dynamic elements. Appl Ocean Res. 43:184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd's Register of Shipping. 2016. Additional design procedures for the assessment of container ship lashing bridge structures. London.
   Google Scholar
• Moro L, Bulian G, Brocco E, Bresciani F, Biot M, Francescutto A. 2015. Failure analysis of container stacks by non-linear FE simulations under non-linear inertial loads. 16th International Congress of the International maritime Association of the Mediter-ranean (IMAM 2015); pp. 745–754.
   Google Scholar
• Oshiro RE, Alves M. 2012. Predicting the behaviour of structures under impact loads using geometrically distorted scaled models. J Mech Phys Solids. 60:1330–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaeepazhand J, Simitses G, Starnes J. 1996. Design of scale down models for predicting shell vibration response. J Sound Vib. 195(195):301–311. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1996.0423
   Google Scholar
• Singh SP, Sen D. 2007. A comparative study on 3D wave load and pressure computations for different level of modelling of nonlinearities. Mar Struct. 20(1-2):1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Kirkayak L, Sueoka H, Futaoka Y, Masabayashi K, Ando H. 2009. Model test of container lashing dynamic behavior. Conference of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers—JASNAOE. 8:465–466.
   Google Scholar
• Vassalos D. 1999. Physical modelling and similitude of marine structures. Ocean Eng. 26(2):111–123. doi: 10.1016/S0029-8018(97)10004-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Hermundstad OA. 2002. Time-domain simulation of wave-induced nonlinear motions and loads and its applications in ship design. Mar Struct. 15(6):561–597. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan B, Zeng J, Zhou R, Zhan Y, Mai S, Zhang J. 2018. Structural analysis and optimization of lashing bridge of 21000TEU ultra large container ship. The 28th international society of offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE); Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Zha X, Zuo Y. 2016. Theoretical and experimental studies on In-Plane stiffness of Integrated container structure. Adv Mech Eng. 8(3):1–20. doi: 10.1177/1687814016637522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang Y, Fan Z. 2015. Similarity analysis between scale model and prototype of large vibrating screen. Shock Vib. 1–7. doi:10.1155/2015/247193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar