The plastic dynamics and failure analysis of ship broadside protection structures subjected to contacted UNDEX: energy dissipation model and simulation

References

• Century Dynamics Inc. 2006. AUTODYN Theory Manual. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Cheng Y, Liu J, Zhang C, Zhou T, Zhang P. 2017. Performance evaluation of air-backed metallic circular plates subjected to close-in underwater explosion. ASME 36th International conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering; Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Cheng Y, Zhang P, Liu J, Chen C, Zhao Y, Wang H. 2020. Contact underwater explosion response of metallic sandwich panels with different face-sheet configurations and core materials. Thin-Walled Struct. 157:107126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto KO. 1921. 軍艦設計に對する歐洲大戦の教訓. 造船協會會報. 29:20–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gannon L. 2019. Submerged aluminum cylinder response to close-proximity underwater explosions – a comparison of experiment and simulation. Int J Impact Eng. 133:103339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge L, Zhang AM, Wang S-P. 2020. Investigation of underwater explosion near composite structures using a combined RKDG-FEM approach. J Comput Phys. 404:109113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurney RW. 1943. The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shell, grenades. Maryland, USA: Aberdeen Proving Ground. Ballistics Impact Report, No 405.
   Google Scholar
• He Z, Chen Z, Jiang Y, Cao X, Zhao T, Li Y. 2020. Effects of the standoff distance on hull structure damage subjected to near-field underwater explosion. Marine Struct. 74:102839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil AH. 1956. Introduction to underwater explosion research. Portsmouth, Virginia: Norfolk Naval Ship Yard. UERD Report.
   Google Scholar
• Keil AH. 1961. The response of ships to underwater explosions. Trans Soc Nav Arch Mar Eng. 69:366–410.
   Google Scholar
• Lai M, Feng SS, Huang GY, Yang N. 2012. Influence of the stiffened plate features on the underwater contact explosion effects. Acta Armamentarii. 33(1):74–79.
   Google Scholar
• Liu RQ, Bai X, Zhu X. 2001. Breach experiment research of vessel element structure models subjected to underwater contact explosion. P Nav U Eng. 13(5):41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Meng XL. 1982. Principle of mine weapon design. Wuhan, People’s Republic of China: Naval Technology College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ming FR, Zhang AM, Xue YZ, Wang SP. 2016. Damage characteristics of ship structures subjected to shockwaves of underwater contact explosions. Ocean Eng. 117:359–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSC Enterprise. 2006. MSC/MVISION Materials Databank, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Navy Department Bureau of Ships. 1942. U.S.S.SARATOGA (CV3) Torpedo Damage Report.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran R, Narasimhan K. 2001. Damage prediction of clamped circular plates subjected to contact underwater explosion. Int J Impact Eng. 25(1):373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Riley MJ, Paulgaard GT, Lee JJ, Smith MJ. 2010. Failure mode transition in air-backed plates from near contact underwater explosions. Shock Vibration. 17(6):723–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YS. 2011. Advances in ship survivability against underwater explosions. Ocean Syst Eng. 1(2):111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Takashi Y. 1990a. 旧海軍艦船の爆弾被害損傷例について–直撃爆弾および至近爆弾による損傷-1. 船の科学. 43(5):62–65.
   Google Scholar
• Takashi Y. 1990b. 旧海軍艦船の爆弾被害損傷例について–直撃爆弾および至近爆弾による損傷-2. 船の科学. 43(5):69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Tang T, Zhu X, Wei ZB, et al. 2012. Review on response of warship structures subjected to a close underwater explosion. Chin J Ship Res. 7(2):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Material Command. 1962. Engineering design handbook: elements of terminal ballistics, parts one and two. Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki T. 1999. Petalling of plates under explosive and impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 22:935–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZF, Ming FR, Zhang AM. 2014. Damage characteristics of coated cylindrical shells subjected to underwater contact explosion. Shock. Vib. Article ID 763607.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Shi XH, Soares CG. 2017. Experimental study on the response of multi-layered protective structure subjected to underwater contact explosions. Int J Impact Eng. 100:23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZF, Sun L, Yao XL, Cao X. 2015. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulation of the submarine structure subjected to a contact underwater explosion. Combust Explo Shock. 51(4):502–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZF, Wang LK, Silberschmidt V, Wang SP. 2016. SPH-FEM simulation of shaped-charge jet penetration into double hull: A comparison study for steel and SPS. Compos Struct. 155(1):135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang AM, Yang WS, Yao XL. 2012. Numerical simulation of underwater contact explosion. Appl Ocean Res. 34:10–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Cheng Y, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Wang H, Chen G, Liu J, Zhang P. 2019. Experimental investigation on the performance of PVC foam core sandwich panels subjected to contact underwater explosion. Compos Struct. 235:111796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Bai XF, Huang RB, Liu RQ, Zhao Y. 2003. Crevasse experiment research of plate Membrane in vessels subjected to underwater contact explosion. Shipbuild. China. 44(1):46–52.
   Google Scholar