Development of parametric equations for ultimate capacity of internally ring-stiffened tubular T/Y-joints under axial and moment load

References

• Ahmadi H. 2016. A probability distribution model for SCFs in internally ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of offshore structures subjected to out-of-plane bending loads. Ocean Eng. 116:184–199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Yong-Bo S, Aminfar MH. 2012. Parametric study and formulation of outer-brace geometric stress concentration factors in internally ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of offshore structures. Appl Ocean Res. 38:74–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Yong-Bo S. 2013. Chord-side SCF distribution of central brace in internally ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints: a geometrically parametric study. Thin-Walled Struct. 70:93–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2013.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Mohammadi AH, Yeganeh A. 2015. Probability density functions of SCFs in internally ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of offshore structures subjected to axial loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 94:485–499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Zavvar E. 2015. Stress concentration factors induced by out-of-plane bending loads in ring-stiffened tubular KT-joints of jacket structures. Thin-Walled Struct. 91:82–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AISC. 2016. ANSI / AISC 360-16: specification for structural steel buildings. USA: American Institute of Steel Construction.
   Google Scholar
• API. 2014. API RP 2A: recommended practice planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms – working stress design. 22nd ed. American Petroleum Institute.
   Google Scholar
• AWS. 2015. AWS d1.1/D1.1M-2015: Structural Welding code – steel. USA: American Welding Society.
   Google Scholar
• Billington CJ, Lalani M, Tebbett IE. 1985. Design of tubular joints for offshore structures, part F5, internally ring-stiffened joints – UEG guide. London: UEG/CIRIA UR33 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Feng R, Xiong L. 2016. Experimental and numerical investigations on double-skin CHS tubular X-joints under axial compression. Thin-Walled Struct. 106:268–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassault Systèmes Simulia. 2018. ABAQUS/standard user’s manual. USA.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2007. ISO 19902: Petroleum and natural gas industries – Fixed steel offshore structures. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Lan X, Wang F, Ning C, Xu X, Pan X, Luo Z. 2016. Strength of internally ring-stiffened tubular DT-joints subjected to brace axial loading. J Constr Steel Res. 125:88–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MMK, Dexter EM. 2004. Finite-element modelling of multi-planar offshore tubular joints. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 126(1):120–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1643388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MMK, Dexter EM, Kirkwood MG. 1995. Strength of moment-loaded tubular T / Y-joints in offshore platforms. J Struct Eng. 73(15):239–246.
   Google Scholar
• Lee MMK, Llewelyn-Parry A. 1999. Strength of ring-stiffened tubular T-joints in offshore structures—a numerical parametric study. J Constr Steel Res. 51:239–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MMK, Llewelyn-Parry A. 2005. Strength prediction for ring-stiffened DT-joints in offshore jacket structures. Eng Struct. 27(3):421–430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall PW. 1992. Design of welded tubular connections—basis and use of AWS code of provisions.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy DSR, Rao AGM, Gandhi P, Pant PK. 1992. Structural efficiency of internally ring-stiffened steel tubular joints. J Struct Eng. 118(11):3016–3035. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:11(3016)
   Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ahmadi H. 2016a. Static performance of doubler plate reinforced tubular T/Y-joints subjected to brace tension. Thin-Walled Struct. 108:138–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ahmadi H. 2016b. Static strength of doubler plate reinforced tubular T/Y-joints subjected to brace compressive loading: study of geometrical effects and parametric formulation. Thin-Walled Struct. 107:231–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ahmadi H. 2016c. Static strength of collar plate reinforced tubular T/Y-joints under brace compressive loading. J Constr Steel Res. 119:39–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ahmadi H. 2016d. Structural behavior of tubular T/Y-joints with collar plate under static in-plane bending. J Constr Steel Res. 123:121–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.04.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ahmadi H. 2016. Static strength of offshore tubular T/Y-joints reinforced with collar plate subjected to tensile brace loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 103:141–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA, Ahmadi H, Zhu L. 2017. Static strength of doubler plate reinforced tubular T/Y-joints under in-plane bending load. J Constr Steel Res. 136:49–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Zhu L, Gu C. 2019. Static capacity of collar plate reinforced tubular X-connections subjected to compressive loading: study of geometrical effects and parametric formulation. Ships Offshore Struct. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1708041.
   Google Scholar
• NORSOK. 2004. N-004: design of steel structures. Norway: Norsok Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Pecknold D, Marshall PW, Bucknell J. 2005. New API RP 2A tubular joint strength design provisions. In: 2005 Offshore Technol Conf. Vol. OTC 17310. Houston, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Riks E. 1979. An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems. Int J Solids Struct. 15(7):529–551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(79)90081-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada Y, Idogaki S, Sekita K. 1979. Static and fatigue tests on T-joints stiffened by an internal ring. In: 11th Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Houston, Texas, USA; p. 563–574.
   Google Scholar
• Thandavamoorthy TS, Rao AGM, Santhakumar AR. 1999. Behavior of internally ring- stiffened joints of offshore platforms. J Struct Eng. 125(11):1348–1352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:11(1348)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young WC, Budynas RG. 1989. Roark’s Formulas for stress and strain, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Yura JA, Zettlemoyer N, Edwards IF. 1980. Ultimate capacity equations for tubular joints. In: 12th Annu Offshore Technol Conf. Vol. OTC 3690. Houston, Texas, USA, p. 113–126.
   Google Scholar