Steering model identification and control design of autonomous ship: a complete experimental study

References

• Artyszuk J. 2017. Performance of the second-order linear Nomoto model in terms of zigzag curve parameters. In Marine navigation. CRC Press; p. 403–409.
   Google Scholar
• Astrom KJ, Källström CG. 1976 Jan. Identification of ship steering dynamics. Automatica. 12(1):9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarsina F, Williams CD. 2013. Nomoto indices for constant-depth zigzag manoeuvres of an autonomous underwater vehicle. Int Sch Res Notices. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brendon AJ, Gary CF. 1995. Development of a horizontal planar motion mechanism for determining hydrodynamic characteristics of underwater vehicles. In Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Australia; p. 151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister HC, Bruhn W, Rødseth ØJ, Porathe T. 2014. Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-Navigation implementation: the MUNIN perspective. Int J e-Nav Maritime Econom. 1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke D. 2003. The foundation of steering and maneuvering. In Maneuvering and control of marine crafts. Girona, Spain; p. 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dantas JL, Caetano WS, Vale RT, de Barros EA. 2013. Analysis of identification methods applied to free model tests of the Pirajuba AUV. IFAC Proc Vol. 46(33):185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey AC, Subramanian VA, Kumar VJ, Bhikkaji B. 2016 Sept. Development of autonomous system for scaled ship model for seakeeping tests. In Oceans 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey. p. 1–5. doi https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2016.7761455.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey AC, Venkat RN, Subramanian AV, Kumar JV. 2017. Wi-Fi enabled autonomous ship model tests for ship motion dynamics and seakeeping assessment. IJMRD. 1(2):29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fossen TI. 2011. Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Im N, Seo JH. 2010. Ship manoeuvring performance experiments using a free running model ship. Int J Marine Navigation Safety Sea Trans. 4(1):29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Jokioinen E, Poikonen J, Jalonen R, Saarni J. 2016. Remote and autonomous ships-the next steps. AAWA Position Paper. London: Rolls Royce plc.
   Google Scholar
• Lv C, Yu H, Chi J, Xu T. 2018. Speed and heading control of unmanned surface vehicle based on IDA-PBC and L2 gain disturbance attenuation approach. In 2018 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC). p. 1704–1708.
   Google Scholar
• Maurya P, Desa E, Pascoal A, Barros E, Navelkar G, Madhan R, Mascarenhas AAMQ. 2006. Control of the Maya AUV in the vertical and horizontal planes: Theory and practical results. In Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft. p. 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira L, Fossen TI, Guedes Soares C. 2007. Path following control system for a tanker ship model. Ocean Eng. 34(14–15):2074–2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira L, Guedes Soares C. 2011 Jan. Autonomous ship model to perform manoeuvring tests. J Maritime Res. 8:29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Nise NS. 2000. Control systems engineering. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nomoto K, Taguchi K, Honda K, Hirano S. 1956 Jan. On the steering qualities of ships. Int Shipbuilding Progress. 1956:75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Perera L, Moreira L, Santos F, Ferrari V, Sutulo S, Soares CG. 2012. A navigation and control platform for real-Time manoeuvring of autonomous ship models. IFAC Proc Vol. 45(27):465–470. 9th IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and Control of Marine Craft.
   Google Scholar
• Perera LP, Oliveira P, Soares CG. 2015. System identification of nonlinear vessel steering. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 137(3):031302.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Zhang L. 2014. Parametric identification of ship's maneuvering motion based on kalman filter algorithm. In Mechatronics and automatic control systems. Springer; p. 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Skjetne R, Smogeli ØN, Fossen TI. 2004. A nonlinear ship manoeuvering model: identification and adaptive control with experiments for a model ship.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng CY. 1998 May. Optimal control of a ship for a course-changing maneuver. J Optim Theory Appl. 97(2):281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng CY, Chen JF. 1999. Fundamental properties of linear ship steering dynamic models. J Marine Sci Technol. 7(2):79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Velasco F, Revestido E, Moyano E, Lopez E. 2007. Manoeuvring model parametric identification of an autonomous in-scale fast-ferry model. In Oceans 2007-Europe. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wróbel K, Montewka J, Kujala P. 2017. Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety. Reliab Eng Syst Safety. 165:155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Hinostroza MA, Soares CG. 2018. Estimation of hydrodynamic coefficients of nonlinear manoeuvring mathematical model with free-running ship model tests. Int J Maritime Eng. 160:213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Meng F, Li Y. 2017. Design and experimental testing of a free-running ship motion control platform. IEEE Access. 6:4690–4696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar